Authentic Incidents of Shiq-e-Sadr in the Prophet’s ﷺ Life

❀ Detailed Research on the Incidents and Frequency of Shiq-e-Sadr (Splitting of the Chest) ❀
Taken from: Fatawa Muhammadiyyah Vol. 1, Pg. 189


❖ Question:​


What do the scholars of Islam say regarding this matter:
On which occasions and how many times did the Shiq-e-Sadr (splitting of the chest) of the Prophet ﷺ occur? Kindly clarify in the light of the Hadith.


❖ Answer:​


Alḥamdulillāh, waṣ-ṣalātu wa-s-salāmu ʿalā Rasūlillāh, ʾAmma baʿd!
I say, and success is from Allāh!



Upon studying the Hadiths and reports related to Shiq-e-Sadr, it is found that the event of the splitting of the chest of the Prophet ﷺ has been narrated to have occurred five times.


The Muhaddithin (Hadith scholars) and biographers of the Prophet ﷺ have mentioned these narrations along with chains of narration and their critiques in their respective compilations. For further details, one may refer to:


Mawahib, Zurqani, Musnad Ahmad, Abu Dawood, Tayalisi, Darimi, Dala’il Abu Nu’aym, Dala’il Bayhaqi, Ibn Asakir, Sunan Darimi, Majma’ al-Zawaid, Zad al-Ma’ad, Fath al-Bari, Tabaqat Ibn Sa’d, Sirah Ibn Hisham, Rawd al-Unuf, Kanz al-Ummal.
For Urdu readers, Sirat al-Nabi ﷺ by Sayyid Sulaiman Nadwi (Vol. 3) is beneficial.


✿ Reported Occasions of Shiq-e-Sadr:​


First time: At the age of five, during foster care with Halimah Sa’diyyah.
Second time: At the age of ten.
Third time: At the age of twenty.
Fourth time: During the early days of Prophethood.
Fifth time: On the night of Mi’raj (Ascension).


However, the narrations regarding the second, third, and fourth instances are extremely weak, and have been critically analyzed by the scholars of al-Jarḥ wa al-Taʿdīl (Hadith criticism).



✿ Detailed Review of Each Reported Occurrence​


1. Shiq-e-Sadr at Age 10 – Narration and Chain:


Narration from Abu ibn Ka’b through Abu Hurairah ﵁:


((عن أبي بن كعب عن أبي هريرة...))
(Refer to Majma’ al-Zawaid for full narration.)


Summary: At the age of ten, the Prophet ﷺ was approached by two angels who opened his chest, removed a clot symbolizing envy and hatred, and inserted mercy and compassion. After sealing his chest, one of the angels said: “Rise and be at peace.”


Evaluation of Chain:
Although Ibn Hibban declared the narrators as trustworthy, the core chain is:


Mu’adh ibn Muhammad ibn Mu’adh → his father Muhammad → his grandfather Mu’adh → Abu Ka’b


As per Ali ibn al-Madini in Kitab al-‘Ilal:


“The entire chain is unknown; we do not recognize Mu’adh, nor his father, nor his grandfather.”


Abu Nu’aym said:


“This Hadith is exclusively narrated by Mu’adh ibn Muhammad, who alone has reported the chest-splitting incident at age ten.”


Hence, this narration is weak and unreliable.


2. Shiq-e-Sadr at Age 20 – Chain Evaluation:


Similar to the above, these reports are also weak, and their core chain again traces back to Mu’adh ibn Muhammad ibn Mu’adh, whose reliability is disputed.



3. Shiq-e-Sadr at the Beginning of Revelation:


Although some narrations in Dala’il Abu Nu’aym, Bayhaqi, Musnad Harith, and Musnad Tayalisi report a Shiq-e-Sadr event at the time of revelation from ʿĀʾishah ﵂, they are unreliable for two main reasons:


❖ Reason 1:​


The most authentic narration about the beginning of revelation comes from ʿĀʾishah ﵂ in Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī, Muslim, and Musnad Ahmad, where no mention of chest-splitting is found.


❖ Reason 2:​


The main narrator is Abu ‘Imran al-Jawni, who is extremely weak, and his shaykh is unknown. Some manuscripts mention Yazid ibn Banayus, known to be a Shi’ite and the alleged killer of ʿAlī ﵁.


Thus, these narrations cannot be accepted.


✿ Shiq-e-Sadr during Foster Care with Halimah Sa’diyyah – Chains and Evaluation​


Eight different chains reach the Sahabah, of which two are authentic, while the rest are weak.


✔ First Chain:​


Jahm ibn Abi Jahm‘Abdullah ibn Ja’farHalimah
Source: Ibn Ishaq, Dala’il Abu Nu’aym


Issues:


  • Jahm is unknown.
  • ‘Abdullah ibn Ja’far did not meet Halimah.
  • Ibn Ishaq shows doubt: “He himself said or someone told him…”
  • Lower narrators are criticized.

✔ Second Chain:​


Narrated by Muhammad ibn ‘Umar al-Waqidi in Ibn Sa’d


Issues:


  • Waqidi is extremely weak, even considered a fabricator.
  • The chain is disconnected: “عن أصحابه” – he omits names above him.

✘ Other Chains:​


  • Abu Nu’aym’s other chain contains unknown narrators.
  • Chain through Ibn ‘Abbas includes Muhammad ibn Zakariyya al-Ghallabi, who is a known fabricator.
  • A narration from Shaddad ibn Aws is rare, with an anonymous narrator and issues with Abu al-‘Ajfa’.

Thus, only two authentic narrations remain:


✿ Authentic Instances of Shiq-e-Sadr​


① During Childhood (Foster care with Halimah Sa’diyyah)​


Narrated by Anas ibn Malik ﵁:


((...فَأَخَذَهُ فَصَرَعَهُ، فَشَقَّ عَنْ قَلْبِهِ...))


  • The angel opened his chest, removed a clot, washed it with Zamzam, and replaced it.
  • Anas ﵁ said: “I saw the stitch marks on his chest.”

The purpose of this surgery is clarified in Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī:


((...فَفَرَجَ صَدْرِي، ثُمَّ غَسَلَهُ مِنْ مَاءِ زَمْزَمَ، ثُمَّ جَاءَ بِطَسْتٍ مِنْ ذَهَبٍ مُمْتَلِئٍ حِكْمَةً وَإِيمَانًا...))


② On the Night of Mi’raj​


Also reported by Anas ibn Malik, this incident occurred in Makkah, before the journey of Ascension.


✅ Conclusion of Research:​


Although five instances are mentioned in literature, only two are authentically proven through strong Hadith chains:


❶ During childhood at the home of Halimah Sa’diyyah
❷ On the night of Mi’raj


The remaining reports do not meet the criteria of authentic transmission.


✿ Response to Objections by Hadith Deniers:​



Objection ①


“How can Anas ﵁ narrate a childhood event of the Prophet ﷺ that occurred before his birth?”


Response:

Anas ﵁ did not claim eyewitness. It is likely that he heard it directly from the Prophet ﷺ or another Sahabi. This is termed "Mursal Sahabi", and it is accepted unanimously as valid evidence.


Objection ②


“The brain is the center of thoughts and emotions, not the heart; so why split the chest instead of the skull?”


Response:



  • From a biological perspective, life depends on the heart, not the brain.
  • The Qur’ān repeatedly affirms that the heart (قلب) is the seat of faith, perception, and understanding — not the brain.

Qur’anic Proofs:


  • ﴿نَزَّلَهُ عَلى قَلبِكَ﴾ – [Al-Baqarah: 97]
  • ﴿إِنَّ اللَّهَ عَليمٌ بِذاتِ الصُّدورِ﴾
  • ﴿لَهُم قُلوبٌ لا يَفقَهونَ بِها﴾ – [Al-A’raf: 179]
  • ﴿تَعمَى القُلوبُ الَّتى فِى الصُّدورِ﴾ – [Al-Hajj: 46]

Thus, operating on the heart aligns perfectly with divine wisdom.



✿ Calling by the Father's Name on the Day of Judgment – Detailed Ruling:​



❖ Claim: “People will be called by their​


❖ Response:​


The narration in Tabarani is very weak, as stated by:


  • Ibn Hajar: “Its chain is very weak.”
  • Ibn al-Qayyim: Declared it weak in commentary on Sunan Abu Dawood.
  • Mulla Ali Qari: Called it fabricated.

Other justifications like protecting the honor of illegitimate children or honoring Isa ﷺ are also baseless and contradict Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī:


((...يُقَالُ هَذِهِ غَدْرَةُ فُلَانِ بْنِ فُلَانٍ))


✅ Correct Position:​


Authentic Hadiths affirm that people will be called by their father’s name.
Any exception (e.g. for ‘Isa ﷺ) is specific, not general.



✅ Final Verdict:​


The two confirmed instances of Shiq-e-Sadr in the life of the Prophet ﷺ are:


  1. During childhood (in the care of Halimah Sa’diyyah)
  2. On the night of Mi’raj

Other narrations are weak or fabricated and cannot be relied upon.
 
Back
Top