It is narrated from Imran bin Husain (may Allah be pleased with him) that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) ransomed two Muslim men in exchange for one male polytheist prisoner. 1. Imam Tirmidhi says:
1- This hadith is Hasan Sahih (good and authentic),
2- Abu Qilabah's name is Abdullah bin Zaid Jarami,
3- Most of the scholars among the Companions and others act upon this, that the Imam has the choice to show kindness to whichever prisoner he wishes, to kill whomever he wishes, and to take ransom from whomever he wishes,
4- Some scholars have preferred killing over ransom,
5- Imam Awza'i says: I have received the information that this verse «فإما منا بعد وإما فداء» is abrogated and the verse: «واقتلوهم حيث ثقفتموهم» is its abrogator,
6- Ishaq bin Mansur says: I asked Imam Ahmad bin Hanbal: What do you consider better when a prisoner is captured, to kill him or to take ransom from him? He replied: If they can take ransom, there is no harm in it, and if they are killed, I see no harm in that either,
7- Ishaq bin Rahwayh says: In my view, shedding blood is better when it becomes well-known and most people desire it.
Explanation & Benefits
Shaykh Dr. Abdur Rahman Freywai
Explanation:
1:
This hadith proves that the exchange of prisoners of war is permissible. This is the opinion of the majority of scholars.
Source: Sunan al-Tirmidhi – Majlis ‘Ilmi Dar al-Da‘wah, New Delhi Edition, Page: 1568
Shaykh Maulana Abdul Aziz Alvi
Hadith Commentary: Benefits and Issues: According to Abdullah ibn Mas'ud radi Allahu anhu, the Messenger of Allah sallallahu alayhi wa sallam would generally turn to the left, while according to Anas radi Allahu anhu, he sallallahu alayhi wa sallam would usually turn to the right. In this way, each one has reported his own observation, and in reality, the Prophet sallallahu alayhi wa sallam would turn both ways. Both ways are permissible and Sunnah; therefore, to make one side obligatory and to strictly adhere to it is not correct. It is a separate matter that, due to the virtue of the right side, a person may turn more often to the right, but since the Prophet sallallahu alayhi wa sallam did not specify this, to make it specific is to legislate in the religion, which is not permissible.
Source: Tuhfat al-Muslim: Commentary on Sahih Muslim, Page: 1641
Shaykh Umar Farooq Saeedi
Benefits and Issues:
In this incident, since this woman was not the owner of the she-camel,
therefore, her vow was considered invalid (laghw).
And it is also understood from this that in a situation of necessity (idtirar), a woman may travel alone.
Source: Sunan Abu Dawood – Commentary by Shaykh Umar Farooq Saeedi, Page: 3316
Shaykh Safi ur-Rahman Mubarakpuri
Takhrij:
«أخرجه الترمذي، السير، باب ما جاء في قتل الأساري والفداء، حديث:1568، ومسلم، النذر، حديث:1641.»©Explanation:
This hadith establishes that the exchange of prisoners of war is permissible.
The majority of scholars also hold this view, but according to Imam Abu Hanifah rahimahullah, exchange is not permissible.
In his opinion, a prisoner should either be killed or enslaved. However, when the Companions radi Allahu anhum captured a man from Banu Aqil, the Banu Thaqif captured two Companions radi Allahu anhuma.
Banu Thaqif were allies of Banu Aqil.
The polytheists released the noble Companions radi Allahu anhum, and the Prophet sallallahu alayhi wa sallam released that polytheist.
This is a clear proof for the majority.
Source: Bulugh al-Maram: Commentary by Safiur Rahman Mubarakpuri, Page: 1105
Shaykh Muhammad Ibrahim bin Basheer
Benefit:
From this, it is understood that freeing Muslims in exchange for disbeliever prisoners is permissible. Also, in this hadith, the courage of a female companion (sahabiyyah) is mentioned, showing how courageous the female companions were. A vow (nadhar) made for a sinful act or for something over which a person has no ownership should not be fulfilled.
Source: Musnad al-Humaydi: Commentary by Muhammad Ibrahim bin Bashir, Page: 850