Sayyiduna Umar bin Khattab (may Allah be pleased with him) made it obligatory upon a man to face the prescribed punishment (hadd) and one-third of the blood money (diyah) for forcibly harming a woman.
Hadith Referenceسنن سعید بن منصور / كتاب الطلاق / 3344
Hadith Gradingمحدثین:إسناده حسن لذاته
Hadith Takhrij«إسناده حسن لذاته، وأخرجه سعيد بن منصور فى «سننه» ترقيم الدرالسلفية برقم:، 2167، وعبد الرزاق فى «مصنفه» برقم: 13663، 17670، وابن أبى شيبة فى «مصنفه» برقم: 28475»
Brief Explanation
Benefit: Support and Evidences: This same subject is mentioned in detail among the jurists of the Hanafis, Shafi‘is, Malikis, and Hanbalis. Ibn Qudamah (al-Mughni), al-Kasani (Bada’i‘ al-Sana’i‘), and al-Mawardi have discussed this matter almost to the point of consensus, stating: "Whoever forces a woman into fornication (zina), the prescribed punishment (hadd) is upon him, and he owes her compensation (‘uqr)." In some narrations, the woman is also given ‘uqr even if she was harmed before penetration occurred. ✅
Summary and Conclusion: This narration is hasan (sound) in its chain, and from it the following principles are derived: - The prescribed punishment (hadd) will be enforced for forced fornication (zina) if penetration is established. - Compensation (‘uqr) will be obligatory for physical harm (iftidaz—defloration). - Sayyiduna ‘Umar radi Allahu anhu combined both the hadd and the ‘uqr—this is a clear example of the justice of al-Faruq. - In the chapter of women’s legal cases (qadaya al-nisa’), the practice of the Tabi‘in and Sahabah is a strong foundation for juristic reasoning.