٢٩٢٠٥ - حدثنا أبو بكر قال: حدثنا محمد بن بكر عن ابن جريج قال: أخبرني هشام عن أبيه قال: كل عمد ليس فيه قود فعقله في مال المصيب، وإن لم يكن له مال فعلى عاقلة المصيب إن قطع (يمينًا) (١) عمدًا، (و) (٢) كانت يمين القاطع قد قطعت ⦗١٥٤⦘ قبل ذلك فعقلها في مال القاطع، (فإن) (٣) لم يكن له مال فعلى عاقلته، وإن كانت له يد يسرى لم يقد منها، والعقل كذلك، (و) (٤) الأعضاء كلها كذلك.
Hazrat Hisham bin Urwah narrates that Hazrat Urwah said: In every case of intentional injury where retaliation (qisas) is not possible, the blood money (diyat) will be obligatory from the wealth of the one who inflicted the wound, and if he does not have wealth, then it will be obligatory upon his family. That is, if someone intentionally cuts off another person's right hand and the perpetrator's right hand was already cut off, then the blood money will be obligatory from the wealth of the perpetrator, and if he does not have wealth, then it will be obligatory upon his family, even if his left hand is present; still, retaliation will not be carried out, and the same ruling will apply regarding the blood money. This same ruling applies to all other limbs as well.