سنن ابن ماجه
Ibn Majah
(أبواب كتاب السنة)Chapters: The Book of the Sunnah
بَابُ : الاِنْتِفَاعِ بِالْعِلْمِ وَالْعَمَلِ بِهِChapter: Gaining benefit from knowledge and acting in accordance with it
Hadith 256M
قال أبو الحسن: حدثنا حازم بن يحيى حدثنا أبو بكر بن أبي شيبة ومحمد بن نمير قالا: حدثنا ابن نمير عن معاوية النصري -وكان ثقة- ثم ذكر الحديث نحوه بإسناده.
With this chain also, Muawiyah Nasri, who is trustworthy, has narrated a report with the same meaning as the aforementioned hadith.
• • •
حَدَّثَنَا إِبْرَاهِيمُ بْنُ نَصْرٍ ، حَدَّثَنَا أَبُو غَسَّانَ مَالِكُ بْنُ إِسْمَاعِيلَ ، حَدَّثَنَا عَمَّارُ بْنُ سَيْفٍ ، عَنْ أَبِي مُعَاذٍ .
‘Ammar says: I do not know whether Abu Mu’adh’s shaykh is Muhammad or Anas bin Sirin.
• • •
قَالَ مَالِكُ بْنُ إِسْمَاعِيل : قَالَ عَمَّارٌ : لَا أَدْرِي مُحَمَّدٌ ، أَوْ أَنَسُ بْنُ سِيرِينَ .
Imam Ibn Majah (may Allah have mercy on him) has, through another chain of narration, also mentioned the narrator’s uncertainty regarding (the narrator Ibn Sirin) as to whether he is Muhammad bin Sirin or Anas bin Sirin.
• • •
Related hadith on this topic
Explanation & Benefits
Shaykh Dr. Abdur Rahman Freywai
Commentary:
Note:
(In the chain of narration, "Abu Ma'an" or "Abu Mu'adh" is a majhool (unknown) narrator,
and "Ammar bin Saif" is weak in hadith,
its other route from Abu Hurairah radi Allahu anhu is also weak,
for details see:
Al-Da'eefa no: 5023,
and 5152)
Note:
(In the chain of narration, "Abu Ma'an" or "Abu Mu'adh" is a majhool (unknown) narrator,
and "Ammar bin Saif" is weak in hadith,
its other route from Abu Hurairah radi Allahu anhu is also weak,
for details see:
Al-Da'eefa no: 5023,
and 5152)
Source: Sunan al-Tirmidhi – Majlis ‘Ilmi Dar al-Da‘wah, New Delhi Edition, Page: 2383
Hafiz Zubair Ali Zai
Hadith Authentication:
Its chain of narration is weak.
There are two reasons for weakness in this chain:
➊ Ammar bin Sayf al-Dhabi al-Kufi was a weak narrator.
Hafiz Ibn Hajar said:
«ضعيف الحديث عابد»
“He was weak in hadith (and) a devout worshipper.” [تقريب التهذيب : 4826]
➋ Ammar bin Sayf’s teacher, Abu Ma‘an or Abu Mu‘adh al-Basri, was unknown (majhool).
Its chain of narration is weak.
There are two reasons for weakness in this chain:
➊ Ammar bin Sayf al-Dhabi al-Kufi was a weak narrator.
Hafiz Ibn Hajar said:
«ضعيف الحديث عابد»
“He was weak in hadith (and) a devout worshipper.” [تقريب التهذيب : 4826]
➋ Ammar bin Sayf’s teacher, Abu Ma‘an or Abu Mu‘adh al-Basri, was unknown (majhool).
Source: Adwa al-Masabih fi Tahqiq Mishkat al-Masabih, Page: 275
