Analyzing Assumptions Behind the Claim of a Modern Prophet's Teachings
An individual has claimed that if a prophet were to come in this era, he would deliver teachings in accordance with the demands of the modern age rather than current so-called “clerical” teachings. According to him, humanity has advanced beyond the 18th century and has already discovered the standards of truth and justice; therefore, any revelation today would reflect those same standards.
① Revelation is shaped by circumstances, hence it evolves according to the needs of each era.
② Today’s human preferences and mindset would form the basis for divine revelation.
③ Current clerical teachings — such as modesty (purdah), women staying at home, and slavery — are deemed unacceptable in the modern era.
This assumption is entirely false. The objective of revelation is to reform and purify mankind, not to validate their existing ideas and practices.
◈ Prophets never come to endorse societal or intellectual trends, but to correct deviations.
◈ If revelation were a product of prevailing circumstances, then why were prophets rejected and even killed?
◈ Prophet Nuh (عليه السلام) was denied for 950 years — was his message not aligned with the “demands of the time”?
This claim is also baseless. All prophets are sent with the same mission — human reformation.
◈ If a prophet were to appear today, would he not prohibit fornication in Norway and Sweden?
◈ Would he permit immodesty and the removal of the veil?
◈ If not, would the claimant even accept such a revelation?
Clearly, the claimant is projecting his own thinking as the standard but refuses to accept any other worldview or moral system.
To claim that Western-originated ideas — such as freedom, women’s rights, or equality — represent the true standards of justice is itself flawed.
◈ It is illogical to consider ideas derived from Western history and philosophy as criteria against the Qur’an and Sunnah.
◈ What evidence supports the notion that Western values would align with the revelation brought by a prophet of God?
This is a critical point to ponder. If someone insists that a new prophet would validate their thoughts and lifestyle, then the very need for a prophet vanishes.
◈ Prophets are sent to reform those who have strayed, not to confirm their existing deeds.
◈ The purpose of revelation has always been to clarify the truth, whether people accept it or reject it.
The claim that a prophet in this era would present different teachings is not only false but illogical. Revelation has always come with the same objective: to bring mankind back to God and reform them. The social norms or ideological trends of any particular era can never be the standard for divine revelation.
❖ Summary of the Question-like Claim
An individual has claimed that if a prophet were to come in this era, he would deliver teachings in accordance with the demands of the modern age rather than current so-called “clerical” teachings. According to him, humanity has advanced beyond the 18th century and has already discovered the standards of truth and justice; therefore, any revelation today would reflect those same standards.
❖ Fundamental Assumptions Behind the Claim
① Revelation is shaped by circumstances, hence it evolves according to the needs of each era.
② Today’s human preferences and mindset would form the basis for divine revelation.
③ Current clerical teachings — such as modesty (purdah), women staying at home, and slavery — are deemed unacceptable in the modern era.
❖ Analysis of the Claim
1. Assumption: Revelation is Subordinate to Circumstances
This assumption is entirely false. The objective of revelation is to reform and purify mankind, not to validate their existing ideas and practices.
◈ Prophets never come to endorse societal or intellectual trends, but to correct deviations.
◈ If revelation were a product of prevailing circumstances, then why were prophets rejected and even killed?
◈ Prophet Nuh (عليه السلام) was denied for 950 years — was his message not aligned with the “demands of the time”?
2. Assumption: Teachings for Today’s Human Would Be Different
This claim is also baseless. All prophets are sent with the same mission — human reformation.
◈ If a prophet were to appear today, would he not prohibit fornication in Norway and Sweden?
◈ Would he permit immodesty and the removal of the veil?
◈ If not, would the claimant even accept such a revelation?
Clearly, the claimant is projecting his own thinking as the standard but refuses to accept any other worldview or moral system.
3. Assumption: Western Thought Is the Standard of Truth
To claim that Western-originated ideas — such as freedom, women’s rights, or equality — represent the true standards of justice is itself flawed.
◈ It is illogical to consider ideas derived from Western history and philosophy as criteria against the Qur’an and Sunnah.
◈ What evidence supports the notion that Western values would align with the revelation brought by a prophet of God?
4. . Why Is a New Prophet Needed?
This is a critical point to ponder. If someone insists that a new prophet would validate their thoughts and lifestyle, then the very need for a prophet vanishes.
◈ Prophets are sent to reform those who have strayed, not to confirm their existing deeds.
◈ The purpose of revelation has always been to clarify the truth, whether people accept it or reject it.
✔ Conclusion
The claim that a prophet in this era would present different teachings is not only false but illogical. Revelation has always come with the same objective: to bring mankind back to God and reform them. The social norms or ideological trends of any particular era can never be the standard for divine revelation.
