• 🌟 Support the Mission of Spreading Authentic Islamic Knowledge 🌟

    Tohed.com is dedicated to sharing the pure teachings of Islam based on the Qur’an & Sunnah.

    📦 Your donation = Sadaqah Jariyah!

    “The most beloved of deeds to Allah are those that are most consistent, even if small.” – Bukhari

Teaching the Qur'an as Mahr: Shar'i Legitimacy and Historical Evidence

Adapted from the original article by Shaykh Ghulam Mustafa Zaheer Amonpuri حفظه الله

❖ The Legality of Qur'an Teaching as Mahr​

It is permissible and valid in Sharīʿah to appoint Qur'anic instruction as the mahr (bridal gift) in a marriage contract, as multiple authentic hadiths support this practice.

✿ The Hadith of Sahl ibn Saʿd رضي الله عنه​

A woman offered herself to the Prophet ﷺ. A companion requested to marry her. The Prophet ﷺ asked him if he had anything to offer as mahr:
When he had nothing, the Prophet ﷺ asked if he knew any part of the Qur'an. He replied affirmatively. The Prophet ﷺ said:
"I have married her to you on the condition that you teach her the portion of Qur'an you know."
(Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī: 5029, Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim: 1425)

❖ Scholarly Commentary​

Imām al-Shāfiʿī: Based on this hadith, it is valid to appoint Qur'an teaching as mahr when wealth is unavailable.
Imām Mālik: This was compensation for teaching the Qur'an.
Ḥāfiẓ Ibn al-Jawzī: The hadith proves that Qur’an can be appointed as mahr.
Ḥāfiẓ al-Khaṭṭābī: The "bāʾ" in "بِمَا مَعَكَ" denotes exchange, confirming Qur'an teaching as compensation.
Imām al-Qurṭubī: Jurists agree this hadith proves the permissibility of delayed mahr and using Qur'an instruction as compensation.
Ḥāfiẓ Ibn Kathīr: Teaching the Qur'an was the agreed mahr, not an honorary gift.
Imām Ibn al-Qayyim: The hadith confirms such a marriage contract is valid by both textual evidence and reason.

❖ Refutation of Fabricated Reports​

Several weak or fabricated narrations have been falsely cited to negate Qur'an as mahr:

Narration by Abū Nuʿmān al-Azdī: Declared false and unsupported by Ḥāfiẓ Ibn ʿAbd al-Hādī and Ḥāfiẓ al-Dhahabī.
Statement of Makḥūl al-Shāmī: Declared mursal and non-authoritative.
Narration in Dārquṭnī & Bayhaqī: Involves ʿUtbah ibn Sakan, a discarded and unreliable narrator.

  • Both Imām Dārquṭnī and Imām al-Bayhaqī reject it.
  • Ḥāfiẓ Ibn Ḥajar: Unauthentic.

❖ Summary​

✔ Teaching the Qur'an as mahr is permissible, valid, and well-established by authentic hadiths and the consensus of scholars.
✔ False reports opposing this ruling have been critically examined and rejected.
✔ This ruling reflects the practicality and inclusiveness of Islamic law, accommodating for those who cannot afford material mahr.
 
Back
Top