❖ Ruling:
If a slave marries without the permission of his master, the Nikāḥ is invalid. This ruling is established by an authentic Hadith and supported by the consensus of the majority of scholars.
❖ Evidence from Hadith:
Narrated by Jābir (رضي الله عنه):
"Whichever slave marries without the permission of his master, he is a fornicator (زانی).”
❖ Opinion of Ibn Taymiyyah (رحمه الله):
"If a slave marries without the permission of his master, the marriage is invalid by consensus (اجماع) of the Muslims."
❖ Opinion of the Jumhūr (Majority of Scholars):
They hold the same view:
✔ The marriage of a slave is invalid without the master's prior consent.
❖ Juristic Disagreement on Later Approval:
What if the owner approves after the marriage? Will the Nikāḥ be validated?
The scholars differ:
◈ Ḥanafīs:
— The marriage is pending (موقوف) upon the owner’s approval.
→ If he later grants permission, the Nikāḥ becomes valid.
◈ Imām al-Shāfiʿī:
— The Nikāḥ is void from the outset (باطل),
→ and cannot be validated by later approval,
→ because a void contract cannot be fixed retroactively.
◈ Imām Mālik:
— The Nikāḥ is initially valid,
→ but the owner retains the right to annul it.
❖ Strongest View (Rājih):
The opinion of Imām al-Shāfiʿī is most sound, based on:
➤ The explicit wording of the Hadith:
"...he is a fornicator..." – indicating the absence of Nikāḥ legitimacy
➤ The principle:
A void act cannot become valid merely by later approval
✔ Thus, such a Nikāḥ remains invalid, and the slave must seek prior permission from the master.
❖ Conclusion:
➤ A slave cannot marry without the owner's permission.
➤ If he does, the Nikāḥ is invalid (باطل).
➤ Even post-marriage approval does not rectify it (as per the soundest view).
➤ This ruling is supported by authentic Hadith, consensus, and majority of scholars.
ھذا ما عندي واللہ أعلم بالصواب