Key Difference Between Ijtihād and Forming a Personal Opinion

❖ Fundamental Difference Between Ijtihād and Forming a Personal Opinion ❖
Response by: Shaykh Abdul Wakeel Nasir ḥafiẓahullāh


❖ Question:​


What is the difference between performing ijtihād and forming a new personal opinion?



❖ Definition of Ijtihād​


Ijtihād is derived from the Arabic root “jahd”, meaning effort and exertion.
◈ It refers to a systematic scholarly process requiring:


  • Deep reflection
  • Comprehensive Islamic knowledge
  • Strict adherence to Shar‘i principles and methodology

✅ Ijtihād is the exertion of scholarly effort to derive a ruling for a matter where there is no explicit textual evidence.



❖ Definition of Forming an Opinion​


◈ Forming an opinion is a person’s individual perspective,
◈ It does not require scholarly training or adherence to formal methodology.
Anyone, based on limited knowledge or personal experience, may express an opinion.



❖ Key Differences​


✦ 1. Scholarly Effort & Capability​


  • Ijtihād: Requires in-depth study, proficiency in Arabic, Qur’ān, Sunnah, Uṣūl al-Fiqh, and other sciences.
  • Opinion: Can be formed without scholarly training or rigorous study.


✦ 2. Strength of Conclusion


  • Ijtihād: Produces a researched, well-founded legal ruling.
  • Opinion: Based on personal understanding, which may lack depth or authenticity.


✦ 3. Regulation by Shar‘i Principles​


  • Ijtihād: Must follow Islamic legal methodology (uṣūl).
  • Opinion: Has no binding rules and may vary greatly in reliability.


✅ Summary​


AspectIjtihādPersonal Opinion
Requires KnowledgeYes – deep Islamic scholarshipNo
Bound by PrinciplesYes – Shar‘i rules and uṣūlNo – based on personal logic or experience
Output ReliabilityStrong, scholarly, and reasoned resultSubjective and unverified
Accepted AuthorityFrom qualified scholars (mujtahids)From laypersons or general public
 
Back
Top