Authenticity of Hadith: Teaching Qur’an While in Need of Ghusl

❀ Verification of the Hadith: A Person in Need of Ghusl Teaching the Qur’an ❀
Derived from: Fatāwā ʿIlmiyyah, Vol. 1, Kitāb al-ʿAqāʾid, p. 199


❖ Question:​


Is the following ḥadīth authentic:
"The Messenger of Allah ﷺ would not teach us the Qur’an unless he was in a state of ritual purity (i.e., not in a state requiring ghusl)?"


❖ Answer:​


Alḥamdulillāh, and peace and blessings be upon the Messenger of Allah. Amma baʿd:


✿ 1. Chain of Transmission (Isnād) of the Ḥadīth​


This ḥadīth is reported by:


Abū Dāwūd (Ḥadīth: 229)
Al-Nasāʾī (Ḥadīth: 267)
Ibn Mājah (Ḥadīth: 594) – all from Shuʿbah
Al-Tirmidhī (Ḥadīth: 146) – from al-Aʿmash and Muḥammad ibn ʿAbd al-Raḥmān ibn Abī Laylā


All narrate it through the chain of ʿAmr ibn Murrah → ʿAbdullāh ibn Salamah → ʿAlī ibn Abī Ṭālib رضي الله عنه.


✿ 2. Scholarly Opinions on the Ḥadīth​


Imām al-Tirmidhī: Declared it ḥasan ṣaḥīḥ.
Ibn Khuzaymah (Ḥadīth: 208), Ibn Ḥibbān (al-Mawrid: 192–193), Ibn al-Jārūd (Ḥadīth: 94), al-Ḥākim (4/107), and al-Dhahabī: All graded it ṣaḥīḥ.
Ibn Ḥajar al-ʿAsqalānī said:


"Al-ḥaqq annahu min qabīl al-ḥasan, yaṣluḥu lil-ḥujjah"
(Fatḥ al-Bārī, 1/408, Ḥadīth 305)
“The correct view is that it is ḥasan and suitable as evidence.”


✿ 3. Objections to the Ḥadīth and Responses​


❖ Objection 1:​


➤ Some have criticized the ḥadīth due to ʿAbdullāh ibn Salamah’s solitary narration.
➤ However, major scholars such as Yaʿqūb ibn Shaybah, al-ʿAjlī, Ibn ʿAdī, and the majority of hadith scholars have declared him thiqqah (trustworthy) and ṣadūq.
➤ Thus, the criticisms by Abū Ḥātim and al-Ḥākim al-Kabīr are unfounded and rejected.


❖ Objection 2:​


➤ While it is true that ʿAbdullāh ibn Salamah experienced memory confusion in later life, this particular narration was transmitted by ʿAmr ibn Murrah, a reliable and precise narrator, who heard it before the ikhtilāṭ.
➤ Furthermore, the ḥadīth’s classification as ḥasan or ṣaḥīḥ by several hadith masters proves it was preserved accurately.


❖ Objection 3:​


Ibn ʿAdī in al-Kāmil (4/1487) quotes that Shuʿbah reportedly said:


“ʿAbdullāh ibn Salamah narrated this ḥadīth after growing old.”
➤ This statement is unsourced and unverified, and even if attributed to Aḥmad ibn Ḥanbal via Sufyān ibn ʿUyaynah, it would require clear proof of hearing.


➤ On the contrary, Shuʿbah’s own words are reported with sound chains, showing confidence in the ḥadīth:
Ibn Khuzaymah (1/104):


“This ḥadīth is one-third of my collection.”
Al-Dāraqutnī (Ḥadīth: 423):
“I do not narrate anything more excellent than this ḥadīth.”


✿ 4. Supporting (Mawqūf) Report from ʿAlī رضي الله عنه​


Al-Dāraqutnī (1/118, Ḥadīth: 419) and Al-Bayhaqī in al-Sunan al-Kubrā (1/89) narrated a mawqūf report:


“A person in the state of janābah should not recite even a single letter of the Qur’an.”
— from Abū al-Gharīf ʿUbaydullāh ibn Khalīfah al-Hamadānī from ʿAlī رضي الله عنه.


Al-Dāraqutnī said:


“It is authentically narrated from ʿAlī رضي الله عنه.”


Abū al-Gharīf has been declared trustworthy by Ibn Ḥibbān and al-Dāraqutnī, thus this mawqūf report strengthens the main narration.


❖ Summary and Conclusion​


✔ The narration of ʿAbdullāh ibn Salamah is ḥasan li-dhātih (in and of itself).
✔ Due to supporting reports from Abū al-Gharīf and others, it reaches the level of ṣaḥīḥ li-ghayrih (sound due to external evidence).
✔ Therefore, the ḥadīth is authentic and suitable as evidence in rulings.


وَاللهُ أَعْلَمُ بِالصَّوَابِ
 
Back
Top
Telegram
Facebook