Authenticity and Analysis of the Ḥadīth «مَنْ تَعَلَّقَ شَيْئًا وُكِلَ إِلَيْهِ»

Complete Analysis of the Ḥadīth «مَنْ تَعَلَّقَ شَيْئًا وُكِلَ إِلَيْهِ»
(Excerpt: Fatāwā ʿIlmiyyah – Tawḍīḥ al-Aḥkām, Vol. 2, p. 467)


Text of the Ḥadīth:


«مَنْ تَعَلَّقَ شَيْئًا وُكِلَ إِلَيْهِ»
"Whoever hangs something (like an amulet, pot, or string), will be left to it."


Primary Chains of Transmission:


1️⃣ Main Chain:


Narrated by: Muḥammad ibn ʿAbd al-Raḥmān ibn Abī Laylā → from his brother ʿĪsā ibn ʿAbd al-Raḥmān ibn Abī Laylā → from ʿAbdullāh ibn ʿUkaym


  • Reported by:
    • al-Ḥākim (4/216, ḥadīth 7503)
    • Ibn Abī Shaybah (7/371, ḥadīth 23447)
    • al-Bayhaqī (9/351)

Status of Muḥammad ibn Abī Laylā:


  • Declared ḍaʿīf by the majority of muḥaddithīn.
  • Al-Būṣayrī: “Ḍaʿʿafahu al-jumhūr” – “The majority weakened him.” (Miṣbāḥ al-Zujājah, p. 854)

📌 Due to his weakness, this chain is weak.


2️⃣ Ṭabarānī’s Version:


  • al-Muʿjam al-Kabīr (22/385, ḥadīth 960) with chain: Muḥammad ibn Abī Laylā → ʿĪsā → Abū Maʿbad al-Juhanī
  • Abū Maʿbad is actually ʿAbdullāh ibn ʿUkaym, so the chain has the same weakness due to Muḥammad ibn Abī Laylā.

Supporting (Shāhid) Narrations:


(1) From Abū Hurayrah رضي الله عنه:


Chain: ʿAbbād ibn Maysarah al-Munqarī → from al-Ḥasan → from Abū Hurayrah


  • Sources:
    • al-Sunan al-Mujtabā (7/112, ḥadīth 4084)
    • al-Sunan al-Kubrā (3542)
    • al-Kāmil by Ibn ʿAdī (4/1648)

Weakness:


  1. No clear statement of hearing between al-Ḥasan al-Baṣrī and Abū Hurayrah (al-Ḥasan was a mudallis).
  2. ʿAbbād ibn Maysarah is ḍaʿīf (Taqrīb al-Tahdhīb, no. 3149).

(2) From ʿImrān ibn Ḥuṣayn رضي الله عنه:


Chain: Mubārak ibn Faḍālah → from al-Ḥasan → from ʿImrān ibn Ḥuṣayn


  • Ṣaḥīḥ Ibn Ḥibbān (6053 / 6085)
  • Issue: Mubārak ibn Faḍālah is a mudallis and does not state hearing here; also, al-Ḥasan’s hearing from ʿImrān is not clearly established.

(3) From ʿUqbah ibn ʿĀmir رضي الله عنه:


«مَنْ تَعَلَّقَ تَمِيمَةً فَلَا أَتَمَّ اللهُ لَهُ، وَمَنْ تَعَلَّقَ وَدَعَةً فَلَا وَدَعَ اللهُ لَهُ»
"Whoever wears a talisman, may Allah not fulfill (his need); and whoever wears a seashell charm, may Allah not grant him peace."


  • Sources: Musnad Aḥmad (4/154, ḥadīth 17404), Ṣaḥīḥ Ibn Ḥibbān (6054 / 6086), al-Mustadrak (4/216) – al-Ḥākim graded it ṣaḥīḥ, al-Dhahabī agreed.
  • This chain is ḥasan; Khālid ibn ʿUbayd is considered ṣaḥīḥ al-ḥadīth by Ibn Ḥibbān, al-Ḥākim, and al-Dhahabī.

Report from a Tābiʿī:


Abū Majlaz (Lāḥiq ibn Ḥumayd) said:
"مَنْ تَعَلَّقَ عَلَاقَةً وُكِلَ إِلَيْهَا"
"Whoever hangs an amulet will be left to it."


  • Muṣannaf Ibn Abī Shaybah (7/374, ḥadīth 23456) – authentic chain.

Conclusion:


  • The exact wording «مَنْ تَعَلَّقَ شَيْئًا وُكِلَ إِلَيْهِ» is weak in chain because of Muḥammad ibn Abī Laylā.
  • However, the meaning is supported by authentic and ḥasan narrations such as:
    • The ḥadīth on wearing tamīmah or wadaʿah.
    • Authentic statements of the Tābiʿīn.

📌 Ruling: The concept is sound in Islamic teaching — hanging superstitious or shirk-based objects is prohibited and indicates reliance on them instead of Allah.


Allah knows best.
 
Back
Top
Telegram
Facebook