سُوْرَةُ قٓ

Surah Qaaf (50) — Ayah 14

The letter Qaaf · Meccan · Juz 26 · Page 518

وَأَصْحَـٰبُ ٱلْأَيْكَةِ وَقَوْمُ تُبَّعٍ ۚ كُلٌّ كَذَّبَ ٱلرُّسُلَ فَحَقَّ وَعِيدِ ﴿14﴾
And the Dwellers of the Wood, and the people of Tubba‘. Everyone of them denied (their) Messengers, so My Threat took effect.
وَأَصْحَـٰبُ wa-aṣḥābu And (the) companions
ٱلْأَيْكَةِ l-aykati (of) the wood
وَقَوْمُ waqawmu and (the) people
تُبَّعٍۢ ۚ tubbaʿin (of) Tubba
كُلٌّۭ kullun All
كَذَّبَ kadhaba denied
ٱلرُّسُلَ l-rusula the Messengers
فَحَقَّ faḥaqqa so was fulfilled
وَعِيدِ waʿīdi My Threat

Tafsir al-Quran al-Karim is a 4-volume Quran commentary by Hafiz Abdus Salam bin Muhammad Bhutvi, a renowned Salafi (Ahl al-Hadith) scholar and Sheikh ul-Hadith from Pakistan. Based on over 45 years of teaching and research, this tafsir follows the methodology of Tafsir bil-Ma'thur — interpreting the Quran through authentic Hadith, statements of the Companions, and the understanding of the early generations (Salaf). It is distinguished by its complete avoidance of Israeliyyat (Judeo-Christian narratives) and unverified reports. The tafsir is originally written in Urdu, translated to English by tohed.com.

The tafsir of this verse may be read with the following verses.

Tafsir Ahsan al-Bayan is a well-known Quran commentary by Hafiz Salahuddin Yusuf, a renowned Salafi (Ahl al-Hadith) scholar from Pakistan. This tafsir explains the meanings of the Quran in accordance with the methodology of the Salaf (early righteous generations), relying on authentic sources and straightforward language. Due to its reliability and adherence to sound Islamic scholarship, the Saudi government publishes and distributes this tafsir among the Hujjaj (pilgrims) visiting the Haramain. The tafsir is originally written in Urdu, translated to English by tohed.com.

14. 1. For اَصْحَاب الاءَیْکَۃِ see Surah Ash-Shu'ara (وَمَآ اَنْتَ اِلَّا بَشَرٌ مِّثْلُنَا وَاِنْ نَّظُنُّكَ لَمِنَ الْكٰذِبِيْنَ 186؀ۚ) 26. Ash-Shu'ara:186) footnote.

14. 2. For قَوْمُ تُبَعِ see Surah Ad-Dukhan, (اَهُمْ خَيْرٌ اَمْ قَوْمُ تُبَّــعٍ ۙ وَّالَّذِيْنَ مِنْ قَبْلِهِمْ ۭ اَهْلَكْنٰهُمْ ۡ اِنَّهُمْ كَانُوْا مُجْرِمِيْنَ 37؀) 44. Ad-Dukhan:37) footnote.

14. 3. That is, each one of them denied their respective prophet. In this, there is comfort for the Messenger of Allah ﷺ, as if it is being said to you ﷺ that you should not be saddened by the denial from your people, because this is not something new. The nations before you ﷺ also treated their prophets (peace be upon them) in the same way. Secondly, it is a warning to the people of Makkah that the previous nations denied the prophets (peace be upon them), so see what their end was. Do you also want the same end for yourselves? If you do not like this outcome, then leave the path of denial and believe in the Messenger ﷺ.

Tafsir Taiseer ul-Quran (Facilitation of the Quran) is a comprehensive Quran commentary by Maulana Abdul Rahman Kilani, a renowned Salafi (Ahl al-Hadith) scholar from Pakistan. Known for his eloquent and accessible writing style, Kilani authored this tafsir with a focus on clarity — making Quranic meanings understandable to the common reader. The tafsir provides detailed historical context for verses related to battles and expeditions, and firmly refutes modernist ideologies using strong scriptural evidence. It is widely regarded as an invaluable resource for understanding the Quran and countering deviant interpretations. The tafsir is originally written in Urdu, translated to English by tohed.com.

And the dwellers of the forest and the people of Tubba‘ [14]—each denied the messengers [15], so My warning of punishment [16] was fulfilled against them.

[14] The stories of all these nations have already passed in Surah Al-A'raf, Yunus, Hud, Hijr, Furqan, and Dukhan, and the details have come in the footnotes. They may be referred to there.

[15] It may also mean that each of these nations denied their own messenger, and it may also mean that every nation denied all the messengers, because they were deniers of the very concept of messengership. That is, according to their belief, no human could ever come as a messenger. And it may also mean that denying their own messenger was considered equivalent to denying all the messengers, because the fundamental teachings of all messengers are the same. And denying the messengers means denying the teachings of the messenger.

[16]
The Fate of the Nations Who Denied the Hereafter:

A fundamental part of the basic teachings of all messengers has been faith in the Hereafter. And the nations mentioned above—all of them were deniers of the Hereafter, or of being resurrected after death, and of being presented before Allah, and of the belief in being held accountable. The inevitable result of denying the Hereafter is that it leads both individuals and nations onto the paths of mischief and corruption. This is because such people have no fear of being held accountable. Then, when a messenger comes and warns them of their evil end, they have become so rebellious and bold in their sins that they do not accept to return to the right path in any way. On the contrary, they begin to deny and hurt the messengers, and continue to advance in rebellion and disobedience until they are seized as a consequence of their deeds, and their name and trace are wiped from the face of existence.