سُوْرَةُ الْمُؤْمِنِ

Surah Ghafir (40) — Ayah 69

The Forgiver · Meccan · Juz 24 · Page 475

أَلَمْ تَرَ إِلَى ٱلَّذِينَ يُجَـٰدِلُونَ فِىٓ ءَايَـٰتِ ٱللَّهِ أَنَّىٰ يُصْرَفُونَ ﴿69﴾
See you not those who dispute about the Ayât (proofs, evidence, verses, lessons, signs, revelations, etc.) of Allâh? How are they turning away [from the truth, (i.e. Islâmic Monotheism to the falsehood (i.e. polytheism)]?
أَلَمْ alam Do not
تَرَ tara you see
إِلَى ilā [to]
ٱلَّذِينَ alladhīna those who
يُجَـٰدِلُونَ yujādilūna dispute
فِىٓ concerning
ءَايَـٰتِ āyāti (the) Signs
ٱللَّهِ l-lahi (of) Allah
أَنَّىٰ annā How
يُصْرَفُونَ yuṣ'rafūna they are turned away

Tafsir al-Quran al-Karim is a 4-volume Quran commentary by Hafiz Abdus Salam bin Muhammad Bhutvi, a renowned Salafi (Ahl al-Hadith) scholar and Sheikh ul-Hadith from Pakistan. Based on over 45 years of teaching and research, this tafsir follows the methodology of Tafsir bil-Ma'thur — interpreting the Quran through authentic Hadith, statements of the Companions, and the understanding of the early generations (Salaf). It is distinguished by its complete avoidance of Israeliyyat (Judeo-Christian narratives) and unverified reports. The tafsir is originally written in Urdu, translated to English by tohed.com.

(Ayah 69) { اَلَمْ تَرَ اِلَى الَّذِيْنَ يُجَادِلُوْنَ …:} In this surah, from the beginning up to this point, the baseless argumentation of the disbelievers and its condemnation has been mentioned five times. See verses (4, 5, 35, 56, 69). Here, the Prophet (peace be upon him) and every person who hears or reads these verses are told that (from the discourse from the beginning of the surah up to this point) have you not realized that those who argue unjustly and dispute crookedly about the signs of Allah, despite knowing the proofs of their authenticity, from where do they stumble and fall into the pit of misguidance?

Tafsir Ahsan al-Bayan is a well-known Quran commentary by Hafiz Salahuddin Yusuf, a renowned Salafi (Ahl al-Hadith) scholar from Pakistan. This tafsir explains the meanings of the Quran in accordance with the methodology of the Salaf (early righteous generations), relying on authentic sources and straightforward language. Due to its reliability and adherence to sound Islamic scholarship, the Saudi government publishes and distributes this tafsir among the Hujjaj (pilgrims) visiting the Haramain. The tafsir is originally written in Urdu, translated to English by tohed.com.

69. 1 For denial and rejection, or for its refutation and invalidation.

69. 2 That is, despite the manifestation of proofs and the clarity of the truth, how do they not accept the truth? This is an expression of amazement.

Tafsir Taiseer ul-Quran (Facilitation of the Quran) is a comprehensive Quran commentary by Maulana Abdul Rahman Kilani, a renowned Salafi (Ahl al-Hadith) scholar from Pakistan. Known for his eloquent and accessible writing style, Kilani authored this tafsir with a focus on clarity — making Quranic meanings understandable to the common reader. The tafsir provides detailed historical context for verses related to battles and expeditions, and firmly refutes modernist ideologies using strong scriptural evidence. It is widely regarded as an invaluable resource for understanding the Quran and countering deviant interpretations. The tafsir is originally written in Urdu, translated to English by tohed.com.

Have you not seen those who dispute concerning the signs of Allah? How they are turned away [92]?

[92]
Deriving One’s Own Doctrines from the Verses of the Quran, and Disputation and Sectarianism in Them:

By the signs of Allah are meant the signs in the universe and within the self, which the Quran has mentioned at countless places and here too as proofs of Tawheed. Yet, the polytheists dispute in them and associate Allah’s beloved ones with Him in His powers. And if by these verses are meant Allah’s commands and instructions, then it refers to those people who, after reaching the extreme of one aspect, establish a doctrine, and then interpret those verses which appear contrary to their established doctrine. For example, when some people saw man’s helplessness in matters of life and death and sustenance, they formed the doctrine that man is absolutely compelled and is merely a plaything in the hands of Power. Then, they interpreted those verses which proved man’s choice. In opposition to such people, others arose who, from the very verses of the Quran, established the doctrine that man is absolutely free and can do whatever he wishes. And they interpreted those verses which proved man’s helplessness. In this way, due to disputation in Allah’s verses, reaching the extreme of one side, and ignoring the other aspect, at the beginning of Islam, two sects—Jabriyah and Qadariyah—emerged in opposition to each other. It is the same issue of predestination, about which the Messenger of Allah ﷺ strictly forbade discussion. As a result of disputation on this very issue, these two sects came into being and began to dispute in the verses of the Quran and to use them as evidence in support of their respective doctrines. Whereas, in this matter, the correct and moderate path is that man is compelled in some matters and has choice in others. This is the wisdom and will of Allah Almighty. Now, the justice of Allah Almighty is that in those matters where man is compelled, there will be no accountability upon him. Accountability or questioning will only be regarding those matters in which he has choice, or to the extent that he has choice. Later, all the innovative sects that arose, each based their reasoning on the Quran itself and made arbitrary interpretations, even to the extent that, in their own inventions, they did not refrain from making both semantic and literal distortions. And we have already presented some such interpretations in our footnotes.