سُوْرَةُ النِّسَآءِ

Surah An-Nisaa (4) — Ayah 35

The Women · Medinan · Juz 5 · Page 84

وَإِنْ خِفْتُمْ شِقَاقَ بَيْنِهِمَا فَٱبْعَثُوا۟ حَكَمًا مِّنْ أَهْلِهِۦ وَحَكَمًا مِّنْ أَهْلِهَآ إِن يُرِيدَآ إِصْلَـٰحًا يُوَفِّقِ ٱللَّهُ بَيْنَهُمَآ ۗ إِنَّ ٱللَّهَ كَانَ عَلِيمًا خَبِيرًا ﴿35﴾
If you fear a breach between them twain (the man and his wife), appoint (two) arbitrators, one from his family and the other from her’s; if they both wish for peace, Allâh will cause their reconciliation. Indeed Allâh is Ever All-Knower, Well-Acquainted with all things.
وَإِنْ wa-in And if
خِفْتُمْ khif'tum you fear
شِقَاقَ shiqāqa a dissension
بَيْنِهِمَا baynihimā between (the) two of them
فَٱبْعَثُوا۟ fa-ib'ʿathū then send
حَكَمًۭا ḥakaman an arbitrator
مِّنْ min from
أَهْلِهِۦ ahlihi his family
وَحَكَمًۭا waḥakaman and an arbitrator
مِّنْ min from
أَهْلِهَآ ahlihā her family
إِن in If
يُرِيدَآ yurīdā they both wish
إِصْلَـٰحًۭا iṣ'lāḥan reconciliation
يُوَفِّقِ yuwaffiqi will cause reconciliation
ٱللَّهُ l-lahu Allah
بَيْنَهُمَآ ۗ baynahumā between both of them
إِنَّ inna Indeed
ٱللَّهَ l-laha Allah
كَانَ kāna is
عَلِيمًا ʿalīman All-Knower
خَبِيرًۭا khabīran All-Aware

Tafsir al-Quran al-Karim is a 4-volume Quran commentary by Hafiz Abdus Salam bin Muhammad Bhutvi, a renowned Salafi (Ahl al-Hadith) scholar and Sheikh ul-Hadith from Pakistan. Based on over 45 years of teaching and research, this tafsir follows the methodology of Tafsir bil-Ma'thur — interpreting the Quran through authentic Hadith, statements of the Companions, and the understanding of the early generations (Salaf). It is distinguished by its complete avoidance of Israeliyyat (Judeo-Christian narratives) and unverified reports. The tafsir is originally written in Urdu, translated to English by tohed.com.

(Ayah 35) {وَ اِنْ خِفْتُمْ شِقَاقَ بَيْنِهِمَا …:} Previously, only the woman’s rebellion was mentioned. Now, if mutual dislike and opposition arise from both sides and there is fear of separation, the authority should appoint one wise person from each of the husband’s and wife’s families as arbiters (judges or mediators). If both of them are sincere in making peace, Allah will create harmony between them. If reconciliation is not possible, do they have the authority to decide on separation or not? Some scholars have said that if both the husband and wife give the arbiters the authority to reconcile or separate, saying, “Whatever decision you make, we will accept,” then the arbiters have the authority to decide on separation as well. Others have said that if the authority who appointed the arbiters gives them the power to decide both reconciliation and separation, then they have the authority to decide on separation; otherwise, they do not. However, the majority of scholars say that the very purpose of appointing arbiters is that, after reviewing the matters of both parties, whatever decision the arbiters make regarding reconciliation or separation will be enforced. There is no need for the husband and wife or the authority to give them separate permission. The Holy Qur’an places greater emphasis on efforts to bring about reconciliation.

Tafsir Ahsan al-Bayan is a well-known Quran commentary by Hafiz Salahuddin Yusuf, a renowned Salafi (Ahl al-Hadith) scholar from Pakistan. This tafsir explains the meanings of the Quran in accordance with the methodology of the Salaf (early righteous generations), relying on authentic sources and straightforward language. Due to its reliability and adherence to sound Islamic scholarship, the Saudi government publishes and distributes this tafsir among the Hujjaj (pilgrims) visiting the Haramain. The tafsir is originally written in Urdu, translated to English by tohed.com.

35. 1. If the aforementioned three methods do not prove effective inside the home, then this is the fourth method, and regarding this it is said that if the arbitrators (those who make decisions) are sincere, then surely their efforts for reconciliation will be successful. However, in case of failure, whether the arbitrators have the authority to separate the spouses, i.e., to grant divorce or not, there is a difference of opinion among the scholars. Some condition it upon the order of a competent authority or upon the spouses appointing them as agents for separation, and the majority of scholars hold this view without such conditions (for details, see Tafsir Tabari, Fath al-Qadir, Tafsir Ibn Kathir).

Tafsir Taiseer ul-Quran (Facilitation of the Quran) is a comprehensive Quran commentary by Maulana Abdul Rahman Kilani, a renowned Salafi (Ahl al-Hadith) scholar from Pakistan. Known for his eloquent and accessible writing style, Kilani authored this tafsir with a focus on clarity — making Quranic meanings understandable to the common reader. The tafsir provides detailed historical context for verses related to battles and expeditions, and firmly refutes modernist ideologies using strong scriptural evidence. It is widely regarded as an invaluable resource for understanding the Quran and countering deviant interpretations. The tafsir is originally written in Urdu, translated to English by tohed.com.

35. And if you fear a breach between the two (husband and wife) [61], appoint an arbitrator from his family and an arbitrator from her family. If they both desire reconciliation [62], Allah will cause it between them. Surely, Allah is All-Knowing, All-Aware.

[61]
Arbitration Decision Between Spouses:

And if the relationship between husband and wife is not improving and each of them is blaming the other, then before divorce, both parties should appoint arbitrators from their respective families who, after understanding the entire situation, should sincerely try to bring about reconciliation. These arbitrators can be one person from each side, or two from each, or even three from each. Whatever arrangement is mutually agreed upon by both husband and wife can be adopted.

[62] Here, "both" can refer to the husband and wife, or to the arbitrators from both sides. That is, if their intention is good, Allah Almighty will surely create a way for reconciliation between the spouses. Here, the question arises that if the arbitrators succeed in bringing about a compromise, then that is the desired outcome. But if they reach the conclusion that there is no solution except separation, do they also have the authority (i.e., to have the man pronounce divorce or to grant khula) or not? According to most scholars, this arbitration bench does have this authority because it is also a kind of court. And some scholars say that such authority belongs only to the court, and this bench can present its recommendations before the court. The court itself can exercise this authority, or it can delegate this authority to the arbitration bench, or, if it wishes, it can appoint a separate bench from its side and grant it this authority. As is the case nowadays, such powers have been delegated to Union Councils in our country.