حَدَّثَنَا
مَحْمُودُ بْنُ غَيْلَانَ، حَدَّثَنَا
أَبُو دَاوُدَ، عَنْ
شُعْبَةَ، عَنْ
الْأَعْمَشِ، قَال : سَمِعْتُ
أَبَا وَائِلٍ يُحَدِّثُ ، عَنْ
عَمْرِو بْنِ الْحَارِثِ ابْنِ أَخِي زَيْنَبَ امْرَأَةِ عَبْدِ اللَّهِ ، عَنْ
زَيْنَبَ امْرَأَةِ عَبْدِ اللَّهِ ، عَنِ النَّبِيِّ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ نَحْوَهُ . قَالَ أَبُو عِيسَى : وَهَذَا أَصَحُّ مِنْ حَدِيثِ أَبِي مُعَاوِيَةَ ، وَأَبُو مُعَاوِيَةَ وَهِمَ فِي حَدِيثِهِ ، فَقَالَ : عَنْ عَمْرِو بْنِ الْحَارِثِ ، عَنْ ابْنِ أَخِي زَيْنَبَ ، وَالصَّحِيحُ إِنَّمَا هُوَ عَنْ عَمْرِو بْنِ الْحَارِثِ ابْنِ أَخِي زَيْنَبَ ، وَقَدْ رُوِيَ عَنْ عَمْرِو بْنِ شُعَيْبٍ ، عَنْ أَبِيهِ ، عَنْ جَدِّهِ ، عَنِ النَّبِيِّ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ " " أَنَّهُ رَأَى فِي الْحُلِيِّ زَكَاةً " " وَفِي إِسْنَادِ هَذَا الْحَدِيثِ مَقَالٌ . وَاخْتَلَفَ أَهْلُ الْعِلْمِ فِي ذَلِكَ ، فَرَأَى بَعْضُ أَهْلِ الْعِلْمِ مِنْ أَصْحَابِ النَّبِيِّ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ وَالتَّابِعِينَ فِي الْحُلِيِّ زَكَاةَ مَا كَانَ مِنْهُ ذَهَبٌ وَفِضَّةٌ . وَبِهِ يَقُولُ سُفْيَانُ الثَّوْرِيُّ ، وَعَبْدُ اللَّهِ بْنُ الْمُبَارَكِ ، وقَالَ بَعْضُ أَصْحَابِ النَّبِيِّ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ ، مِنْهُمْ ابْنُ عُمَرَ ، وَعَائِشَةُ ، وَجَابِرُ بْنُ عَبْدِ اللَّهِ ، وَأَنَسُ بْنُ مَالِكٍ لَيْسَ فِي الْحُلِيِّ زَكَاةٌ ، وَهَكَذَا رُوِيَ عَنْ بَعْضِ فُقَهَاءِ التَّابِعِينَ ، وَبِهِ يَقُولُ مَالِكُ بْنُ أَنَسٍ ، وَالشَّافِعِيُّ ، وَأَحْمَدُ ، وَإِسْحَاق .
´Amr bin Al-Harith, the nephew of Zainab, the wife of Abdullah, narrated that :` Zainab, the wife of Abdullah narrated similarly from the Prophet.
Explanation & Benefits
Shaykh Dr. Abdur Rahman Freywai
English Commentary:
1:
Because they have considered ‘Amr ibn al-Harith and the nephew of ‘Abdullah ibn Mas‘ud’s wife Zaynab as two separate individuals, and the first is narrating from the second, whereas this is not the case. Rather, both are the same person; “the nephew of Zaynab” is a description of ‘Amr ibn al-Harith. The addition of “from” (ʿan) between ‘Amr ibn al-Harith and “the nephew of Zaynab” is an error (wahm) of Abu Mu‘awiyah. The correct version is without “ʿan,” as is found in the narration of Shu‘bah.
2:
The better and more appropriate view in this matter is that jewelry made for use—if it is for pride and boasting, or for extravagance and wastefulness, or to avoid paying zakat—then zakat is due on it. Otherwise, zakat is not obligatory on it. The nisab (minimum threshold) for zakat on gold jewelry is seven and a half tolahs, that is, 80 grams of pure gold; if at least this amount of pure gold remains in possession for one year, then the owner must pay zakat at the rate of 2.5%. Remember, pure gold is measured in carats. For details, see “Fiqh al-Zakat.” (Abu Yahya)
Source: Sunan al-Tirmidhi – Majlis ‘Ilmi Dar al-Da‘wah, New Delhi Edition, Page: 636