Hadith 2931

حَدَّثَنَا الْحُسَيْنُ بْنُ مُحَمَّدٍ الْبَصْرِيُّ، حَدَّثَنَا عَبْدُ اللَّهِ بْنُ حَفْصٍ، حَدَّثَنَا ثَابِتٌ الْبُنَانِيُّ، عَنْ شَهْرِ بْنِ حَوْشَبٍ، عَنْ أُمِّ سَلَمَةَ، أَنّ النَّبِيَّ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ : " كَانَ يَقْرَؤُهَا إِنَّهُ عَمَلٌ غَيْرُ صَالِحٍ سورة هود آية 46 " ، قَالَ أَبُو عِيسَى : هَذَا حَدِيثٌ قَدْ رَوَاهُ غَيْرُ وَاحِدٍ عَنْ ثَابِتٍ الْبُنَانِيِّ نَحْوَ هَذَا ، وَهُوَ حَدِيثُ ثَابِتٍ الْبُنَانِيِّ ، وَقَدْ رُوِيَ هَذَا الْحَدِيثُ أَيْضًا عَن شَهْرِ بْنِ حَوْشَبٍ ، عَنْ أَسْمَاءَ بِنْتِ يَزِيدَ قَالَ : وَسَمِعْتُ عَبْدَ بْنَ حُمَيْدٍ ، يَقُولُ : أَسْمَاءُ بِنْتُ يَزِيدَ هِيَ أُمُّ سَلَمَةَ الْأَنْصَارِيَّةُ ، قَالَ أَبُو عِيسَى : كِلَا الْحَدِيثَيْنِ عِنْدِي وَاحِدٌ ، وَقَدْ رَوَى شَهْرُ بْنُ حَوْشَبٍ غَيْرَ حَدِيثٍ عَنْ أُمِّ سَلَمَةَ الْأَنْصَارِيَّةِ وَهِيَ أَسْمَاءُ بِنْتُ يَزِيدَ ، وَقَدْ رُوِيَ عَنْ عَائِشَةَ ، عَنِ النَّبِيِّ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ نَحْوُ هَذَا .
´Narrated Umm Salamah:` "The Prophet (ﷺ) would recite: 'Innahu 'Amila Ghaira Salih.'"
Hadith Reference سنن ترمذي / كتاب القراءات عن رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم / 2931
Hadith Grading الألبانی: صحيح، الصحيحة (2809)
Hadith Takhrij «سنن ابی داود/ الحروف (3982، و 2983) ( تحفة الأشراف : 18163/الف) ، و مسند احمد (6/459) (صحیح) (سند میں شہر بن حوشب ضعیف راوی ہیں، لیکن متابعات و شواہد کی بنا پر یہ حدیث صحیح ہے، ملاحظہ ہو: الصحیحة رقم: 2809)»
Related hadith on this topic
Explanation & Benefits
Shaykh Dr. Abdur Rahman Freywai
Explanation:
1:
This is not Umm al-Mu’minin Umm Salamah,
rather, she is an Ansari female Companion.
However, in some narrations of Musnad Ahmad, the addition of "Umm al-Mu’minin" is found, so al-Mizzi has mentioned this hadith under both biographies.

2:
The son of Nuh (alayhis salam) performed an unrighteous deed.

Note:
(In the chain of narration, Shahr ibn Hawshab is a weak narrator,
but due to supporting narrations and corroborating evidence, this hadith is authentic.
See: al-Sahihah, no. 2809)
Source: Sunan al-Tirmidhi – Majlis ‘Ilmi Dar al-Da‘wah, New Delhi Edition, Page: 2931
Shaykh Dr. Abdur Rahman Freywai
Commentary:
Note:
(In the chain of narration, Shahr ibn Hawshab is a weak narrator,
but due to supporting narrations and corroborating evidence, this hadith is sahih li-ghayrihi (authentic due to external evidence).
See:
al-Silsilah al-Sahihah, no. 2809)
Source: Sunan al-Tirmidhi – Majlis ‘Ilmi Dar al-Da‘wah, New Delhi Edition, Page: 2932
Shaykh Umar Farooq Saeedi
Benefits and Issues:
In this noble verse, the recitation of the majority is as follows: that is, “deed” is in the nominative case (marfu‘) as the subject of the report.
And “other than” is its attribute, therefore it too is in the nominative case (marfu‘).
This noble verse is regarding the son of Prophet Nuh (alayhis salam), that his deeds are not righteous.
Its translation will be in the past tense.
He has done unrighteous (evil) deeds.
Source: Sunan Abu Dawood – Commentary by Shaykh Umar Farooq Saeedi, Page: 3982
Hafiz Abdush Shakoor Tirmidhi
Benefits: From the aforementioned hadith, it is understood that the various recitations (qira’at) of the Noble Qur’an are established:
For example, the Prophet sallallahu alayhi wa sallam recited:
«اِنَّهُ عَمِلَ غَيْرُ صَالِحٍ»
That is, «عَمِلَ» is a past tense verb, and «غَيْرَ» is its object, i.e., in the accusative case (mansub).
In the past tense, its translation would be:
“He performed unrighteous deeds.”
But the recitation of the majority (jumhur) is:
«اِنَّهُ عَمَلٌ غَيْرُ صَالِحٍ»
«عَمَلٌ»: «اِنَّ» is the nominative predicate (marfu‘), and «غَيْرُ» is its attribute.
This verse was revealed regarding the son of Nuh (Noah) alayhis salam.
Source: Musnad Ishaq bin Rahwayh, Page: 13