حَدَّثَنَا
مَحْمُودُ بْنُ غَيْلَانَ، حَدَّثَنَا
سُفْيَانُ بْنُ عُقْبَةَ أَخُو قَبِيصَةَ بْنِ عُقْبَةَ ، حَدَّثَنَا
سُفْيَانُ الثَّوْرِيُّ، عَنْ
مُوسَى بْنِ عُبَيْدَةَ، عَنْ
مُحَمَّدِ بْنِ كَعْبٍ، عَنْ
ابْنِ عَبَّاسٍ، قَالَ : " إِنَّمَا كَانَتْ الْمُتْعَةُ فِي أَوَّلِ الْإِسْلَامِ كَانَ الرَّجُلُ يَقْدَمُ الْبَلْدَةَ لَيْسَ لَهُ بِهَا مَعْرِفَةٌ فَيَتَزَوَّجُ الْمَرْأَةَ بِقَدْرِ مَا يَرَى أَنَّهُ يُقِيمُ ، فَتَحْفَظُ لَهُ مَتَاعَهُ وَتُصْلِحُ لَهُ شَيْئَهُ حَتَّى إِذَا نَزَلَتِ الْآيَةُ إِلا عَلَى أَزْوَاجِهِمْ أَوْ مَا مَلَكَتْ أَيْمَانُهُمْ سورة المؤمنون آية 6 " . قَالَ ابْنُ عَبَّاسٍ : " فَكُلُّ فَرْجٍ سِوَى هَذَيْنِ فَهُوَ حَرَامٌ " .
´Muhammad bin Ka'b narrated that:` Ibn Abbas said: "Mut'ah was only during the beginning of Islam. A man would arrive in a land that he was not familiar with so he would marry a woman for the extent of time that he thought he would remain there. So his Mut'ah was upheld and his case was fine until the (following) Ayah was revealed: Except their wives or what their right hands possess. Then every private part other than those became unlawful."
Explanation & Benefits
Shaykh Dr. Abdur Rahman Freywai
Commentary:
Note:
(The narrator "Musa bin Ubaydah" is weak,
and this narration is also shaadh (anomalous).
Hafiz Ibn Hajar says in Fath al-Bari:
Its chain is weak,
and it is also shaadh because it contradicts the reason for the permissibility of mut‘ah,
Fath al-Bari 9/148.
Hafiz Ibn Hajar is referring to that narration of al-Bukhari in which Abu Jamrah says:
"I heard Ibn Abbas, when asked about mut‘ah with women, that he permitted it, so his servant said: This was only due to severe circumstances and scarcity of women, or he said something similar, so Ibn Abbas said:
Yes,
that is how it is."
From this narration of al-Bukhari, it appears that Ibn Abbas had completely retracted his fatwa permitting mut‘ah,
and he declared it absolutely impermissible.)
Source: Sunan al-Tirmidhi – Majlis ‘Ilmi Dar al-Da‘wah, New Delhi Edition, Page: 1122