حَدَّثَنَا دَعْلَجُ بْنُ أَحْمَدَ قَالَ : سَأَلْتُ مُوسَى بْنُ هَارُونَ ، عَنْ هَذَا الْحَدِيثِ ، قَالَ : لَيْسَ بِشَيْءٍ فِيهِ شَهْرُ بْنُ حَوْشَبٍ ، وَشَهْرٌ ضَعِيفُ ، وَالْحَدِيثِ فِي رَفْعِهِ شَكٌّ . وَقَالَ ابْنُ أَبِي حَاتِمٍ قَالَ أَبِي : سِنَانِ بْنُ رَبِيعَةَ أَبُو رَبِيعَةَ ، مُضْطَرِبُ الْحَدِيثِ.
Dalej bin Ahmad reports: I asked Musa bin Harun about this narration, and he said: "There is no reality to it; in its chain is a narrator named Shahr bin Hawshab, and the narrator named Shahr is weak, and there is doubt regarding this hadith being 'marfu''." Ibn Abu Hatim has stated this: My father has stated: The narrator Abu Rabi'ah Sinan bin Rabi'ah becomes confused when transmitting hadith.