فَحَدَّثَنَا بِهِ مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ الْمُظَفَّرِ ، نا محَمَّدُ بْنُ مُحَمَّدِ بْنِ سُلَيْمَانَ ، نا الْمُسَيِّبُ بِهَذَا الإِسْنَادِ مَوْقُوفًا غَيْرَ مَرْفُوعٍ إِلَى النَّبِيِّ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ ، وَالْمَحْفُوظُ أَنَّهُ مِنْ قَوْلِ عِكْرِمَةَ غَيْرُ مَرْفُوعٍ إِلَى النَّبِيِّ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ ، وَلا إِلَى ابْنِ عَبَّاسٍ ، وَالْمُسَيِّبُ ضَعِيفٌ.
The same narration is transmitted with another chain from Musayyib as a "mawquf" narration, not as a "marfu'" hadith. More authentically, it is established that this is the statement of 'Ikrimah; it is not a "marfu'" hadith reaching the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him), nor is its attribution to Sayyiduna 'Abdullah ibn 'Abbas (may Allah be pleased with them both) correct. The narrator named Musayyib is weak.