حَدَّثَنَا
أَبُو عَاصِمٍ، حَدَّثَنَا
ابْنُ جُرَيْجٍ، عَنْ
عَمْرٍو هُوَ: ابْنُ دِينَار، عَنْ
طَاوُسٍ، عَنِ
ابْنِ عَبَّاسٍ: أَنَّ عُمَرَ نَشَدَ النَّاسَ قَضَاءَ رَسُولِ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ فِي الْجَنِينِ فَقَامَ حَمَلُ بْنُ مَالِكِ بْنِ النَّابِغَةِ، فَقَالَ: كُنْتُ بَيْنَ امْرَأَتَيْنِ، فَضَرَبَتْ إِحْدَاهُمَا الْأُخْرَى بِمِسْطَحٍ،"فَقَضَى رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ فِي جَنِينِهَا
بِغُرَّةٍ، وَأَنْ تُقْتَلَ بِهَا".
Sayyiduna Ibn Abbas (may Allah be pleased with them both) narrated that Sayyiduna Umar bin Al-Khattab (may Allah be pleased with him) sought the decision of the Messenger of Allah (peace be upon him) regarding the fetus (the child in the womb). Haml bin Malik bin Nabighah stood up and said: I was between two women, one of them struck the other with a piece of wood (she died and her child also died «كما فى الرواية الأولى» ). So in this case, the Messenger of Allah (peace be upon him) ruled that the blood money for the fetus is the freeing of a male or female slave, and he ordered the killing of the woman who struck, meaning he considered it intentional murder and ruled for retribution, and decided to kill the woman who committed the murder.