صحيح ابن خزيمه
Sahih Ibn Khuzaymah
جماع أبواب ذكر أفعال اختلف الناس فى إباحته للمحرم، نصت سنة النبى صلى الله عليه وسلم أو دلت على إباحتهاChapters on Acts Permitted for the Pilgrim by Sunnah
(298) بَابُ قَطْعِ التَّلْبِيَةِ إِذَا رَمَى الْحَاجُّ جَمْرَةَ الْعَقَبَةِ يَوْمَ النَّحْرِ
Chapter: Stopping the talbiyah after stoning Jamrat al-‘Aqabah on the Day of Sacrifice
Hadith 2885
حَدَّثَنَا عَلِيُّ بْنُ حُجْرٍ ، حَدَّثَنَا إِسْمَاعِيلُ يَعْنِي ابْنَ جَعْفَرٍ ، حَدَّثَنَا مُحَمَّدٌ وَهُوَ ابْنُ أَبِي حَرْمَلَةَ ، عَنْ كُرَيْبٍ مَوْلَى ابْنِ عَبَّاسٍ ، قَالَ كُرَيْبٌ : فَأَخْبَرَنِي عَبْدُ اللَّهِ بْنُ الْعَبَّاسِ ، أَنَّ الْفَضْلَ ، أَخْبَرَهُ " أَنّ النَّبِيَّ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ لَمْ يَزَلْ يُلَبِّي حَتَّى رَمَى الْجَمْرَةَ " ، قَالَ أَبُو بَكْرٍ : خَرَّجْتُ طُرُقَ أَخْبَارِ النَّبِيِّ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ أَنَّهُ لَمْ يَزَلْ يُلَبِّي حَتَّى رَمَى الْجَمْرَةَ فِي كِتَابِي الْكَبِيرِ ، وَهَذِهِ اللَّفْظَةُ دَالَّةٌ عَلَى أَنَّهُ لَمْ يَزَلْ يُلَبِّي رَمْيَ الْجَمْرَةِ بِسَبْعِ حَصَيَاتٍ إِذْ هَذِهِ اللَّفْظَةُ : حَتَّى رَمَى الْجَمْرَةَ وَحَتَّى رَمَى جَمْرَةَ الْعَقَبَةِ ظَاهِرُهَا حَتَّى رَمَى جَمْرَةَ الْعَقَبَةِ بِتَمَامِهَا إِذْ غَيْرُ جَائِزٍ مِنْ جِنْسِ الْعَرَبِيَّةِ إِذَا رَمَى الرَّامِي حَصَاةً وَاحِدَةً أَنْ يُقَالَ : رَمَى الْجَمْرَةَ ، وَإِنَّمَا يُقَالُ : رَمَى الْجَمْرَةَ إِذَا رَمَاهَا بِسَبْعِ حَصَيَاتٍ
Sayyiduna Fadl (may Allah be pleased with him) narrates that the Prophet Muhammad (peace and blessings be upon him) continued to recite the Talbiyah until he stoned Jamrah Aqabah. Imam Abu Bakr (may Allah have mercy on him) says: I have mentioned the chains of these narrations of the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) in Kitab al-Kabir, that he continued to recite the Talbiyah until he stoned Jamrah Aqabah. And these words are evidence that he continued the Talbiyah until he had thrown all seven pebbles, because the apparent meaning of these words "until he stoned" is that all the pebbles were thrown. Because, according to the Arabic language, it is not correct that when the one performing the stoning throws only one pebble, it is said about him that he has completed the stoning at the Jamrah; rather, these words will be said when he has thrown all seven pebbles.
Hadith 2886
وَرُوِيَ عَنِ ابْنِ مَسْعُودٍ ، " فَلَمْ يَزَلْ يُلَبِّي حَتَّى رَمَى جَمْرَةَ الْعَقَبَةِ بِأَوَّلِ حَصَاةٍ " ، ثَنَاهُ عَلِيُّ بْنُ حُجْرٍ ، أَخْبَرَنَا شَرِيكٌ ، عَنْ عَامِرٍ ، عَنْ أَبِي وَائِلٍ ، عَنْ عَبْدِ اللَّهِ ، قَالَ : " رَمَقْتُ النَّبِيَّ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ فَلَمْ يَزَلْ يُلَبِّي حَتَّى رَمَى جَمْرَةَ الْعَقَبَةِ بِأَوَّلِ حَصَاةٍ " ، قَالَ أَبُو بَكْرٍ : وَلَعَلَّهُ يَخْطِرُ بِبَالِ بَعْضِ الْعُلَمَاءِ أَنَّ فِيَ هَذَا الْخَبَرِ دَلالَةٌ عَلَى أَنَّ النَّبِيَّ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ كَانَ يَقْطَعُ التَّلْبِيَةَ عِنْدَ أَوَّلِ حَصَاةٍ يَرْمِيهَا مِنْ جَمْرَةِ الْعَقَبَةِ ، وَهَذَا عِنْدِي مِنَ الْجِنْسِ الَّذِي أَعْلَمْتُ فِي غَيْرِ مَوْضِعٍ مِنْ كِتَابِنَا أَنَّ الأَمْرَ قَدْ يَكُونُ إِلَى وَقْتٍ مُؤَقَّتٍ فِي الْخَبَرِ ، وَالزَّجْرُ يَكُونُ إِلَى وَقْتٍ مُؤَقَّتٍ فِي الْخَبَرِ ، وَلا يَكُونُ فِي ذِكْرِ الْوَقْتِ مَا يَدُلُّ عَلَى أَنَّ الأَمْرَ بَعْدَ ذَلِكَ الْوَقْتِ سَاقِطٌ ، وَلا أَنَّ الزَّجْرَ بَعْدَ ذَلِكَ الْوَقْتِ سَاقِطٌ ، كَزَجْرِهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ عَنِ الصَّلاةِ بَعْدَ الصَّلاةِ حَتَّى تَطْلُعَ الشَّمْسُ ، فَلَمْ يَكُنْ فِي قَوْلِهِ دَلالَةٌ عَلَى أَنَّ الشَّمْسَ إِذَا طَلَعَتْ فَالصَّلاةُ جَائِزَةٌ عِنْدَ طُلُوعِهَا ، إِذِ النَّبِيُّ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ قَدْ زَجَرَ أَنْ يُتَحَرَّى بِالصَّلاةِ طُلُوعُ الشَّمْسِ وَغُرُوبُهَا ، وَالنَّبِيُّ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ قَدْ أَعْلَمَ أَنَّ الشَّمْسَ تَطْلُعُ بَيْنَ قَرْنَيْ شَيْطَانٍ ، فَزَجَرَ عَنِ الصَّلاةِ عِنْدَ طُلُوعِ الشَّمْسِ ، وَقَالَ : وَإِذَا ارْتَفَعَتْ فَارِقْهَا ، فَدَلَّهُمْ بِهَذِهِ الْمُخَاطَبَةِ أَنَّ الصَّلاةَ عِنْدَ طُلُوعِهَا غَيْرُ جَائِزَةٍ حَتَّى تَرْتَفِعَ الشَّمْسُ ، وَقَدْ أَمْلَيْتُ مِنْ هَذَا الْجِنْسِ مَسَائِلَ كَثِيرَةً فِي الْكُتُبِ الْمُصَنَّفَةِ ، وَالدَّلِيلُ عَلَى صِحَّةِ هَذَا التَّأْوِيلِ الْحَدِيثُ الْمُصَرِّحُ الَّذِي حَدَّثْنَاهُ
It is narrated from Sayyiduna Abdullah bin Mas'ud (may Allah be pleased with him) that he continued to recite the Talbiyah until he threw the first pebble at the Jamrah. Sayyiduna Abdullah (may Allah be pleased with him) states that I saw the Noble Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) reciting the Talbiyah continuously until he threw the first pebble at Jamrah Aqabah. Imam Abu Bakr (may Allah have mercy on him) says that perhaps some scholars may think that this hadith contains evidence that the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) would stop reciting the Talbiyah upon throwing the first pebble at Jamrah Aqabah. This issue, in my view, is of the same kind as I have mentioned in several places in my books: sometimes, in a narration, a ruling is specified up to a certain time, and the prohibition of an act is also specified up to a certain time. However, specifying the time does not mean that the ruling or prohibition ends after that time. For example, the Noble Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) forbade performing prayer after the Fajr prayer until the sun rises. But in this statement, there is no evidence that it becomes permissible to pray as soon as the sun rises. And he has explained that the sun rises between the two horns of Satan, so he forbade praying at the time of sunrise. And he said that when the sun rises high, Satan separates from the sun. In this way, he stated that it is not permissible to pray at the time of sunrise until the sun has risen high, then it is permissible. I have written many such issues in my books. The evidence for the correctness of my interpretation is the following hadith which we have mentioned.
Hadith 2887
مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ حَفْصٍ الشَّيْبَانِيُّ ، حَدَّثَنَا حَفْصُ بْنُ غِيَاثٍ ، حَدَّثَنَا جَعْفَرُ بْنُ مُحَمَّدٍ ، عَنْ أَبِيهِ ، عَنْ عَلِيِّ بْنِ حُسَيْنٍ ، عَنِ ابْنِ عَبَّاسٍ ، عَنْ أَخِيهِ الْفَضْلِ ، قَالَ : " أَفَضْتُ مَعَ النَّبِيِّ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ فِي عَرَفَاتٍ ، فَلَمْ يَزَلْ يُلَبِّي حَتَّى رَمَى جَمْرَةَ الْعَقَبَةِ يُكَبِّرُ مَعَ كُلِّ حَصَاةٍ ، ثُمَّ قَطَعَ التَّلْبِيَةَ مَعَ آخِرِ حَصَاةٍ " ، قَالَ أَبُو بَكْرٍ : فَهَذَا الْخَبَرُ يُصَرِّحُ أَنَّهُ قَطَعَ التَّلْبِيَةَ مَعَ آخِرِ حَصَاةٍ لا مَعَ أَوَّلِهَا ، فَإِنْ لَمْ يَفْهَمْ بَعْضُ طَلِبَةِ الْعِلْمِ هَذَا الْجِنْسَ الَّذِي ذَكَرْنَا فِي الْوَقْتِ ، فَأَكْثَرُ مَا فِي هَذَيْنِ الْخَبَرُ مِنْ أَسَاسٍ لَوْ قَالَ : لَمْ يُلَبِّ النَّبِيُّ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ بَعْدَ أَوَّلِ حَصَاةٍ رَمَاهَا ، وَقَالَ الْفَضْلُ : لَبَّى بَعْدَ ذَلِكَ حَتَّى رَمَى الْحَصَاةَ السَّابِعَةَ ، فَكُلُّ مَنْ يَفْهَمُ الْعِلْمَ ، وَيُحْسِنُ الْفِقْهَ ، وَلا يُكَابِرُ عَقَلَهُ ، وَلا يُعَانِدُ عَلِمَ ، أَنَّ الْخَبَرَ هُوَ مَنْ يُخْبِرُ بِكَوْنِ الشَّيْءِ أَوْ بِسَمَاعِهِ لا مِمَّنْ يَدْفَعُ الشَّيْءَ ، وَيُنْكِرُهُ ، وَقَدْ بَيَّنْتُ هَذِهِ الْمَسْأَلَةَ فِي مَوَاضِعَ مِنْ كُتُبِنَا
Sayyiduna Fadl (may Allah be pleased with him) narrates that I returned from Arafat with the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him), and he continued to recite the Talbiyah until he stoned Jamrat al-Aqabah. With every pebble, he would recite « اللهُ أَكْبَرُ », then after throwing the last pebble, he stopped reciting the Talbiyah. Imam Abu Bakr (may Allah have mercy on him) says that this hadith is clear evidence that he stopped the Talbiyah after throwing the last pebble, not after the first pebble. If some students do not understand this issue, that praising something does not negate what comes after it, then at most, this hadith could have been so if the words of the hadith were like this: The Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) did not recite the Talbiyah after the first pebble. Whereas in the narration of Sayyiduna Fadl (may Allah be pleased with him), the words are that he stopped the Talbiyah after the last pebble. Therefore, every person who has scholarly understanding and does not give precedence to his own intellect and opinion, nor is involved in scholarly stubbornness and obstinacy, knows well that the narration is accepted from the narrator who informs about the occurrence of an action, not from the one who informs about the non-occurrence of an action and denies its occurrence. I have explained this issue in several places in my books.
