وَالدَّلِيلُ عَلَى ضِدِّ قَوْلِ مَنْ زَعَمَ أَنَّ الْجُنُبَ إِذَا دَخَلَ نَهْرًا نَاوِيًا لِلسِّبَاحَةِ فَمَاسَّ الْمَاءُ جَمِيعَ بَدَنِهِ، وَلَمْ يَنْوِ غُسْلًا وَلَا أَرَادَهُ إِذَا فُرِضَ الْغُسْلُ، وَلَا تَقَرُّبًا إِلَى اللَّهِ- عَزَّ وَجَلَّ- أَوْ صُبَّ عَلَيْهِ مَاءٌ وَهُوَ مُكْرَهٌ، فَمَاسَّ الْمَاءُ جَمِيعَ جَسَدِهِ أَنَّ فَرْضَ الْغُسْلِ سَاقِطٌ عَنْهُ.
And the explanation of the evidence contrary to the claim of those scholars who say that if a person in a state of major ritual impurity (junub) enters a river without the intention of bathing, and water touches his entire body, even though after the obligation of ghusl (ritual bath) he neither intended nor resolved to perform ghusl, nor was his purpose to seek closeness to Allah Almighty, or water was poured over him by force which he disliked and which touched his entire body, then the obligation of ghusl is lifted from him.