صحيح ابن خزيمه
Sahih Ibn Khuzaymah
جماع أبواب ذكر أفعال اختلف الناس فى إباحته للمحرم، نصت سنة النبى صلى الله عليه وسلم أو دلت على إباحتهاChapters on Acts Permitted for the Pilgrim by Sunnah
(355) بَابُ النَّهْيِ عَنْ صَوْمِ يَوْمِ الْفِطْرِ وَيَوْمِ النَّحْرِ.Prohibition of fasting on Eid al-Fitr and Eid al-Adha.
Hadith 2959
حَدَّثَنَا عَبْدُ الْجَبَّارِ بْنُ الْعَلاءِ ، وَسَعِيدُ بْنُ عَبْدِ الرَّحْمَنِ , قَالا : حَدَّثَنَا سُفْيَانُ ، عَنِ الزُّهْرِيِّ ، عَنْ أَبِي عُبَيْدٍ ، وَقَالَ الْمَخْزُومِيُّ : مَوْلَى ابْنِ أَزْهَرٍ , قَالَ : شَهِدْتُ الْعِيدَ مَعَ عُمَرَ بْنِ الْخَطَّابِ ، فَقَالَ : " إِنّ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ نَهَى عَنْ صِيَامِ هَذَيْنِ الْيَوْمَيْنِ ، وَأَمَّا يَوْمُ الْفِطْرِ فَفِطْرُكُمْ مِنْ صِيَامِكُمْ ، وَأَمَّا يَوْمُ الأَضْحَى ، فَتَأْكُلُونَ فِيهِ مِنْ نُسُكِكُمْ " ، خَرَّجْتُ هَذَا الْبَابَ بِتَمَامِهِ فِي كِتَابِ الصِّيَامِ كِتَابِي الْكَبِيرِ ، قَالَ أَبُو بَكْرٍ : أَبُو عُبَيْدٍ هَذَا اخْتَلَفَ الرُّوَاةُ فِي ذِكْرِ وَلائِهِ ، فَقَالَ بَعْضُ الرُّوَاةِ : مَوْلَى عَبْدِ الرَّحْمَنِ بْنِ عَوْفٍ ، وَمِثْلُ هَذَا لا يَكُونُ عِنْدِي مُتَضَادٌّ قَدْ يَجُوزُ أَنْ يَكُونَ ابْنُ أَزْهَرَ ، وَعَبْدُ الرَّحْمَنِ بْنُ عَوْفٍ اشْتَرَكَا فِي عِتْقِهِ ، فَقَالَ بَعْضُهُمْ : مَوْلَى عَبْدِ الرَّحْمَنِ بْنِ عَوْفٍ ، وَقَالَ بَعْضُهُمْ : مَوْلَى ابْنِ أَزْهَرِ ، لأَنَّ وَلاءَهُ لِمُعْتِقَيْهِ جَمِيعًا
Abu Ubaid, the freed slave of Ibn Azhar, narrates that I participated in Eid with Sayyiduna Umar bin Khattab (may Allah be pleased with him). He said that the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him) forbade fasting on these two (Eid) days. As for Eid al-Fitr, it is because it is the day for you to break your fasts, and as for Eid al-Adha, fasting is prohibited because on that day you eat from your sacrifices. I have explained this completely in the chapter of Kitab al-Kabir under Kitab al-Siyam. Imam Abu Bakr (may Allah have mercy on him) says that there is a difference among narrators regarding the allegiance of Abu Ubaid; some narrators consider him the freed slave of Sayyiduna Abdur Rahman bin Awf (may Allah be pleased with him), and some of Ibn Azhar. But in my view, there is no contradiction in this because it is possible that he was a joint slave of both Sayyiduna Abdur Rahman bin Awf (may Allah be pleased with him) and Ibn Azhar, and both of them freed him. Therefore, some narrators called him the freed slave of Sayyiduna Abdur Rahman bin Awf (may Allah be pleased with him), and some called him the freed slave of Ibn Azhar, because the attribution of allegiance is towards both who freed him.
