Toggle above to switch between keyword search and direct hadith lookup
صحیح ابن حبان
Ibn Hibban
كتاب الشفعةBook of Preemption
ذكر نفي الشفعة عن العقد إذا اشتراها غير شريك لبائعها منها-Denial of preemption for a contract if bought by a non-partner
Hadith 5185
اُردوEn
أَخْبَرَنَا الْحَرُّ بْنُ سُلَيْمَانَ بِأَطْرَابُلْسَ ، قَالَ : حَدَّثَنَا سَعْدُ بْنُ عَبْدِ اللَّهِ بْنِ عَبْدِ الْحَكَمِ ، قَالَ : حَدَّثَنَا الْمَاجِشُونُ ، عَنْ مَالِكٍ ، عَنِ الزُّهْرِيِّ ، عَنْ سَعِيدٍ ، عَنْ أَبِي هُرَيْرَةَ ، قَالَ : قَالَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ : " الشُّفْعَةُ فِيمَا لَمْ يُقْسَمْ ، فَإِذَا وَقَعَتِ الْحُدُودُ وَصُرِفَتِ الطُّرُقُ فَلا شُفْعَةَ " ، قَالَ أَبُو حَاتِمٍ رَضِيَ اللَّهُ عَنْهُ : رَفَعَ هَذَا الْخَبَرَ عَنْ مَالِكٍ أَرْبَعَةُ أَنْفَسٍ الْمَاجِشُونُ ، وَأَبُو عَاصِمٍ ، وَيَحْيَى بْنُ أَبِي قُتَيْلَةَ ، وَأَشْهَبُ بْنُ عَبْدِ الْعَزِيزِ ، وَأَرْسَلَهُ عَنْ مَالِكٍ سَائِرُ أَصْحَابِهِ ، وَهَذِهِ كَانَتْ عَادَةً لِمَالِكٍ يَرْفَعُ فِي الأَحَايِينِ الأَخْبَارِ ، وَيُوقِفُهَا مِرَارًا ، وَيُرْسِلُهَا مَرَّةً ، وَيُسْنِدُهَا أُخْرَى عَلَى حَسَبِ نَشَاطِهِ ، فَالْحُكْمُ أَبَدًا لِمَنْ رَفَعَ عَنْهُ وَأَسْنَدَ بَعْدَ أَنْ يَكُونَ ثِقَةً حَافِظًا مُتْقِنًا عَلَى السَّبِيلِ الَّذِي وَصَفْنَاهُ فِي أَوَّلِ الْكِتَابِ .
Sayyiduna Abu Hurairah, may Allah be pleased with him, narrates that the Prophet Muhammad, peace and blessings be upon him, said: "Preemption (shuf‘ah) applies to that property which has not been divided; when the boundaries have been established and the paths have been separated, then there is no preemption."
(Imam Ibn Hibban, may Allah have mercy on him, says:) Four individuals have narrated this report from Imam Malik as a marfu‘ (attributed to the Prophet) hadith: Majshun, Abu ‘Asim, Yahya bin Abu Qatila, and Al-Shahb bin Abdul Aziz. However, all other students of Imam Malik have narrated this report from him as a mursal (with a missing link) hadith. It was Imam Malik’s practice that sometimes he would narrate a report as a marfu‘ hadith, sometimes as a mawquf (stopped at a companion), sometimes as a mursal, and sometimes as a musnad (with a complete chain). This would be according to his discretion. So, if he narrated a report as a marfu‘ musnad hadith, and the narrator transmitting from him is trustworthy, a hafiz, and precise, then its status will be as we have explained at the beginning of the book.
(Imam Ibn Hibban, may Allah have mercy on him, says:) Four individuals have narrated this report from Imam Malik as a marfu‘ (attributed to the Prophet) hadith: Majshun, Abu ‘Asim, Yahya bin Abu Qatila, and Al-Shahb bin Abdul Aziz. However, all other students of Imam Malik have narrated this report from him as a mursal (with a missing link) hadith. It was Imam Malik’s practice that sometimes he would narrate a report as a marfu‘ hadith, sometimes as a mawquf (stopped at a companion), sometimes as a mursal, and sometimes as a musnad (with a complete chain). This would be according to his discretion. So, if he narrated a report as a marfu‘ musnad hadith, and the narrator transmitting from him is trustworthy, a hafiz, and precise, then its status will be as we have explained at the beginning of the book.
