Hadith 3119
حَدَّثَنَا
قُتَيْبَةُ، حَدَّثَنَا
أَبُو بَكْرِ بْنُ شُعَيْبِ بْنِ الْحَبْحَابِ، عَنْ
أَبِيهِ، عَنْ
أَنَسِ بْنِ مَالِكٍ نَحْوَهُ بِمَعْنَاهُ ، وَلَمْ يَرْفَعْهُ وَلَمْ يَذْكُرْ قَوْلَ أَبِي الْعَالِيَةِ ، وَهَذَا أَصَحُّ مِنْ حَدِيثِ حَمَّادِ بْنِ سَلَمَةَ ، وَرَوَى غَيْرُ وَاحِدٍ مِثْلَ هَذَا مَوْقُوفًا وَلَا نَعْلَمُ أَحَدًا رَفَعَهُ غَيْرَ حَمَّادِ بْنِ سَلَمَةَ ، وَرَوَاهُ مَعْمَرٌ ، وَحَمَّادُ بْنُ زَيْدٍ ، وَغَيْرُ وَاحِدٍ وَلَمْ يَرْفَعُوهُ .
Imam Tirmidhi says:
1- Qutaybah narrated to us, he says: Abu Bakr bin Shu'ayb bin Habhab narrated to us, and Abu Bakr narrated from his father Shu'ayb, and Shu'ayb from Anas bin Malik a hadith with the same meaning as this hadith, but they did not narrate it as marfu‘, nor did they mention the statement of Abu’l-‘Aliyah. This hadith is more authentic than the hadith of Hammad bin Salamah.
2- Several people have narrated a similar hadith as mawquf, and we do not know anyone except Hammad bin Salamah who has narrated it as marfu‘. This hadith has also been narrated by Ma‘mar, Hammad bin Zayd, and several others, but they did not narrate it as marfu‘.