Toggle above to switch between keyword search and direct hadith lookup

Hadith 4891

أَخْبَرَنَا مَحْمُودُ بْنُ غَيْلَانَ ، قَالَ : حَدَّثَنَا عَبْدُ الرَّزَّاقِ ، قَالَ : أَنْبَأَنَا مَعْمَرٌ ، عَنْ أَيُّوبَ ، عَنْ نَافِعٍ ، عَنْ ابْنِ عُمَرَ رَضِيَ اللَّهُ عَنْهُمَا : " أَنَّ امْرَأَةً مَخْزُومِيَّةً كَانَتْ تَسْتَعِيرُ الْمَتَاعَ ، فَتَجْحَدُهُ ، فَأَمَرَ النَّبِيُّ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ بِقَطْعِ يَدِهَا " .
It was narrated from Ibn 'Umar, may Allah be pleased with them both, that a Makhzumi woman used to borrow things then deny that she had borrowed them, so the Prophet (ﷺ) ordered that her hand be cut off.
Hadith Reference سنن نسائي / كتاب قطع السارق / 4891
Hadith Grading الألبانی: صحيح  |  زبیر علی زئی: إسناده صحيح
Hadith Takhrij «سنن ابی داود/الحدود 15 (4395)، (تحفة الأشراف: 7549) مسند احمد (2/151) (صحیح)»
Brief Explanation
1؎: The Noble Prophet sallallahu alayhi wa sallam had the hand of the Makhzumiyyah woman cut off for denying a borrowed item (i.e., refusing to return an item of daily use that was lent to her). From this, some scholars consider the denial of a borrowed item (ariyah) to be theft. (The wording of some narrations of this hadith makes it clear that the Prophet sallallahu alayhi wa sallam described this act as theft.) Other scholars say that the Prophet sallallahu alayhi wa sallam ordered the hand to be cut off for denying a borrowed item so that the practice of lending would not disappear from society and people would not fall into hardship. In any case, it is established that the hand is to be cut off for denying a borrowed item.
Explanation & Benefits
Hafiz Muhammad Ameen
From this hadith, it is understood that if a person borrows something and then denies it while witnesses are present, he will be considered a thief and his hand will be cut off. This is the position of Imam Ahmad and Ishaq and others, because this too is a type of theft, and in fact, its harm to society is even greater. If punishment is not enforced for this, people will refuse to lend things, which will cause difficulties for poor people. Furthermore, it resembles theft in that it is also a means of unlawfully seizing people’s protected property through trickery, and the same occurs in theft. Therefore, the punishment for this crime will also be the same as for theft.

And the Messenger of Allah (sallallahu alayhi wa sallam) is, by Shariah, authorized to clarify the applications of the Shariah; thus, some hadith scholars also hold the view that the hand should be cut off for this crime as well. However, the majority of scholars do not hold this view; rather, they enforce the cutting of the hand only for theft. They interpret this hadith in such a way that the Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa sallam) did not cut off the hand for this crime, but rather for theft, as is clarified in some narrations that he had committed theft. This crime is mentioned only to further censure him. Since in other narrations and chains of transmission, the cutting of the hand for theft is explicitly mentioned, and the incident occurred only once, the preferred position is that of the majority: that the cutting of the hand will be only for theft. And Allah knows best.
Source: Sunan Nasa'i: Translation and Benefits by Shaykh Hafiz Muhammad Amin Hafizullah, Page: 4891