Toggle above to switch between keyword search and direct hadith lookup

Hadith 3937

أَخْبَرَنَا أَحْمَدُ بْنُ مُحَمَّدِ بْنِ الْمُغِيرَةِ ، قَالَ : حَدَّثَنَا عُثْمَانُ بْنُ سَعِيدٍ ، عَنْ شُعَيْبٍ ، قَالَ الزُّهْرِيُّ : كَانَ ابْنُ الْمُسَيَّبِ يَقُولُ : لَيْسَ بِاسْتِكْرَاءِ الْأَرْضِ بِالذَّهَبِ وَالْوَرِقِ بَأْسٌ , وَكَانَ رَافِعُ بْنُ خَدِيجٍ يُحَدِّثُ : أَنَّ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ : " نَهَى عَنْ ذَلِكَ " ، وَافَقَهُ عَلَى إِرْسَالِهِ عَبْدُ الْكَرِيمِ بْنُ الْحَارِثِ .
´It was narrated from Shu'aib:` "Az-Zuhri said: 'Ibn Al-Musayyab used to say: 'There is nothing wrong with leasing land in return for gold and silver, and Rafi bin Khadij used to narrate that the Messenger of Allah forbade that.''"
Hadith Reference سنن نسائي / كتاب المزارعة / 3937
Hadith Grading الألبانی: صحيح لغيره  |  زبیر علی زئی: صحيح
Hadith Takhrij «تفرد بہ النسائي (تحفة الأشراف: 3580) (صحیح) (یہ روایت منقطع ہے، زہری کی رافع رضی الله عنہ سے ملاقات نہیں ہے، لیکن سابقہ متابعات کی وجہ سے صحیح ہے)»
Related hadith on this topic
Brief Explanation
1؎: That is, he has agreed with Shu'ayb, and this agreement is such that between al-Zuhri and Rafi', Salim is not mentioned, whereas Malik and 'Aqil have mentioned Salim.
Explanation & Benefits
Shaykh Umar Farooq Saeedi
Benefits and Issues:
From all these ahadith, it is established that if a landowner, in sharecropping (muzara‘ah), specifies the produce of separate portions of the same field for himself and for the sharecropper, then this type of sharecropping is impermissible.
And this is the corrupt condition
due to which sharecropping has been declared prohibited in its presence.
If this flaw is not present, and instead the land is given for a fixed amount, i.e., on lease (theka), then there is no harm in it.
Source: Sunan Abu Dawood – Commentary by Shaykh Umar Farooq Saeedi, Page: 3393