Toggle above to switch between keyword search and direct hadith lookup
Hadith 3338
اُردوEn
أَخْبَرَنَا عَلِيُّ بْنُ مُحَمَّدِ بْنِ عَلِيٍّ قَالَ : حَدَّثَنَا مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ كَثِيرٍ , عَنْ الْفَزَارِيِّ , عَنْ حُمَيْدٍ , عَنْ أَنَسٍ , قَالَ : قَالَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ : " لَا جَلَبَ وَلَا جَنَبَ وَلَا شِغَارَ فِي الْإِسْلَامِ " , قَالَ أَبُو عَبْد الرَّحْمَنِ : هَذَا خَطَأٌ فَاحِشٌ وَالصَّوَابُ حَدِيثُ بِشْرٍ .
´It was narrated that Anas said:` "The Messenger of Allah said: 'There is no 'bringing', no 'avoidance' and no Shighar in Islam, and whoever robs, he is not one of us.'"
Related hadith on this topic
Brief Explanation
1؎ : In this narration, the narrator Humaid reports from Anas radi Allahu anhu, and in this regard, Humaid would be considered a Tabi‘i. However, this is not correct. In Bishr’s narration, this same Humaid narrates from his teacher Hasan (al-Basri), and he (Hasan al-Basri) narrates from the Companion ‘Imran ibn Husayn. In this regard, Humaid is considered a Tabi‘ Tabi‘i (successor of the successors). Imam al-Nasa’i says: This is what is correct, because Humaid is not a Tabi‘i, but rather a Tabi‘ Tabi‘i.
Explanation & Benefits
Hafiz Muhammad Ameen
Bashar’s narration is as follows: Humayd from Hasan from Imran ibn Husayn, and this is correct; whereas Muhammad ibn Kathir narrated it as Humayd from Anas, which is incorrect. In reality, Humayd narrates many traditions from Anas radi Allahu anhu and is his acknowledged student, but this by no means implies that he narrates every tradition from Anas radi Allahu anhu. Muhammad ibn Kathir made this very mistake by assuming that this narration too was from Anas radi Allahu anhu.
Source: Sunan Nasa'i: Translation and Benefits by Shaykh Hafiz Muhammad Amin Hafizullah, Page: 3338
Maulana Ataullah Sajid
Benefit:
This means that it is a custom of non-Muslims.
Muslims should avoid it because it is an un-Islamic practice.
This means that it is a custom of non-Muslims.
Muslims should avoid it because it is an un-Islamic practice.
Source: Commentary on Sunan Ibn Mājah by Mawlānā ‘Atā’ullāh Sājid, Page: 1885
Hafiz Muhammad Ameen
1853. Commentary: In the era of ignorance (Jahiliyyah), it was common for women to go and wail over a deceased person not out of grief, but on the basis that the female relatives of that deceased had previously come and wailed over one of their own deceased. However, this is cooperation in sin, therefore, reciprocating it in this manner is also forbidden (haram).
Source: Sunan Nasa'i: Translation and Benefits by Shaykh Hafiz Muhammad Amin Hafizullah, Page: 1853
