Hadith 1300Q4
قَالَ مَالِكٌ : إِنَّ الْمُكَاتَبَ إِذَا أَعْتَقَ عَبْدَهُ إِنَّ ذَلِكَ غَيْرُ جَائِزٍ لَهُ. إِلَّا بِإِذْنِ سَيِّدِهِ فَإِنْ أَجَازَ ذَلِكَ سَيِّدُهُ لَهُ ثُمَّ عَتَقَ الْمُكَاتَبُ كَانَ وَلَاؤُهُ لِلْمُكَاتَبِ. وَإِنْ مَاتَ الْمُكَاتَبُ قَبْلَ أَنْ يُعْتَقَ كَانَ وَلَاءُ الْمُعْتَقِ لِسَيِّدِ الْمُكَاتَبِ وَإِنْ مَاتَ الْمُعْتَقُ قَبْلَ أَنْ يُعْتَقَ الْمُكَاتَبُ وَرِثَهُ سَيِّدُ الْمُكَاتَبِ¤
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that if a mukatab (a slave with a contract for freedom) also makes his own slave a mukatab, and then the mukatab of the mukatab is freed before the original mukatab, then his wala’ (right of allegiance) will go to the mawla (master) of the original mukatab until the original mukatab is freed. When the original mukatab is freed, the wala’ of his mukatab will return to him. If the mukatab dies or becomes incapable before paying off the contract, then his free children will not receive the wala’ of their father’s mukatab, because their father did not have the right to wala’, as he was not freed.
Hadith 1300Q5
قَالَ مَالِكٌ : وَكَذَلِكَ أَيْضًا لَوْ كَاتَبَ الْمُكَاتَبُ عَبْدًا فَعَتَقَ الْمُكَاتَبُ الْآخَرُ قَبْلَ سَيِّدِهِ الَّذِي كَاتَبَهُ فَإِنَّ وَلَاءَهُ لِسَيِّدِ الْمُكَاتَبِ مَا لَمْ يَعْتِقِ الْمُكَاتَبُ الْأَوَّلُ الَّذِي كَاتَبَهُ. فَإِنْ عَتَقَ الَّذِي كَاتَبَهُ رَجَعَ إِلَيْهِ وَلَاءُ مُكَاتَبِهِ الَّذِي كَانَ عَتَقَ قَبْلَهُ. وَإِنْ مَاتَ الْمُكَاتَبُ الْأَوَّلُ قَبْلَ أَنْ يُؤَدِّيَ أَوْ عَجَزَ عَنْ كِتَابَتِهِ وَلَهُ وَلَدٌ أَحْرَارٌ لَمْ يَرِثُوا وَلَاءَ مُكَاتَبِ أَبِيهِمْ لِأَنَّهُ لَمْ يَثْبُتْ لِأَبِيهِمُ الْوَلَاءُ. وَلَا يَكُونُ لَهُ الْوَلَاءُ حَتَّى يَعْتِقَ. ¤
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that if a mukatab (contracted slave) is jointly owned by two men, and then one of them waives his right but the other does not, and then the mukatab dies and leaves wealth, then the one who did not waive his right will take his due, and whatever wealth remains will be divided between both of them as if he had died in the state of slavery, because the one who waived his right did not set him free, rather he only forgave his own right.
Hadith 1300Q7
قَالَ مَالِكٌ وَمِمَّا يُبَيِّنُ ذَلِكَ : أَنَّ الرَّجُلَ إِذَا مَاتَ وَتَرَكَ مُكَاتَبًا وَتَرَكَ بَنِينَ رِجَالًا وَنِسَاءً. ثُمَّ أَعْتَقَ أَحَدُ الْبَنِينَ نَصِيبَهُ مِنَ الْمُكَاتَبِ إِنَّ ذَلِكَ لَا يُثْبِتُ لَهُ مِنَ الْوَلَاءِ شَيْئًا وَلَوْ كَانَتْ عَتَاقَةً لَثَبَتَ الْوَلَاءُ لِمَنْ أَعْتَقَ مِنْهُمْ مِنْ رِجَالِهِمْ وَنِسَائِهِمْ. ¤
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said: The evidence for this is: A man died and left behind a mukatab and also left behind sons and daughters. Then one of the daughters freed her share, so the wala’ would not be established for her. If this had been emancipation, then the wala’ would necessarily be established for her.
Hadith 1300Q8
قَالَ مَالِكٌ : وَمِمَّا يُبَيِّنُ ذَلِكَ أَيْضًا أَنَّهُمْ إِذَا أَعْتَقَ أَحَدُهُمْ نَصِيبَهُ ثُمَّ عَجَزَ الْمُكَاتَبُ لَمْ يُقَوَّمْ عَلَى الَّذِي أَعْتَقَ نَصِيبَهُ مَا بَقِيَ مِنَ الْمُكَاتَبِ وَلَوْ كَانَتْ عَتَاقَةً قُوِّمَ عَلَيْهِ حَتَّى يَعْتِقَ فِي مَالِهِ كَمَا قَالَ رَسُولُ اللّٰهِ صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ : ” مَنْ أَعْتَقَ شِرْكًا لَهُ فِي عَبْدٍ قُوِّمَ عَلَيْهِ قِيمَةَ الْعَدْلِ. فَإِنْ لَمْ يَكُنْ لَهُ مَالٌ عَتَقَ مِنْهُ مَا عَتَقَ.“ ¤
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that this is also evidence that if a person frees his share and then the mukatab becomes free, the one who freed his share will not have to pay the price of the remaining shares. If this was considered emancipation, then according to the hadith, he would have to pay the price of the shares of the others.
Hadith 1300Q9
قَالَ مَالِكٌ : وَمِمَّا يُبَيِّنُ ذَلِكَ أَيْضًا أَنَّ مِنْ سُنَّةِ الْمُسْلِمِينَ الَّتِي لَا اخْتِلَافَ فِيهَا. أَنَّ مَنْ أَعْتَقَ شِرْكًا لَهُ فِي مُكَاتَبٍ لَمْ يُعْتَقْ عَلَيْهِ فِي مَالِهِ وَلَوْ عَتَقَ عَلَيْهِ. كَانَ الْوَلَاءُ لَهُ دُونَ شُرَكَائِهِ. ¤
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that another proof of this is that the practice of the Muslims, about which there is no difference, is that if a person frees a share from a mukatab, then he will not be freed from his wealth, because if it were so, the wala’ would go to him and not to his partners.
Hadith 1300Q10
قَالَ مَالِكٌ : وَمِمَّا يُبَيِّنُ ذَلِكَ أَيْضًا أَنَّ مِنْ سُنَّةِ الْمُسْلِمِينَ أَنَّ الْوَلَاءَ لِمَنْ عَقَدَ الْكِتَابَةَ. وَأَنَّهُ لَيْسَ لِمَنْ وَرِثَ سَيِّدَ الْمُكَاتَبِ مِنَ النِّسَاءِ مِنْ وَلَاءِ الْمُكَاتَبِ. وَإِنْ أَعْتَقْنَ نَصِيبَهُنَّ شَيْءٌ إِنَّمَا وَلَاؤُهُ لِوَلَدِ سَيِّدِ الْمُكَاتَبِ الذُّكُورِ أَوْ عَصَبَتِهِ مِنَ الرِّجَالِ.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that another proof of this is that the practice of the Muslims is also that the person who enters into a contract of kitabah, the wala’ will go to him, and among the heirs of the master of the mukatab, the women will not receive the wala’, even if they free a portion themselves. Rather, the wala’ will go to the sons of the master of the mukatab or to other male agnates.