Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that when a mukatab becomes free, his heir will be the person who made him a mukatab, or the closest male relative among the mukatab's relatives on the day the mukatab dies, whether it is a son or another 'asaba (male agnate).
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that in this way, if a person is set free, then his inheritance will go to the closest relative of the one who set him free, whether it is a son or any other male agnate, on the day that the slave died.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that if several brothers are collectively made mukatab, and they have no children who were born during the period of the contract of mukatabah, or who entered into the contract of mukatabah, then those brothers will inherit from one another. If any of them has a son who was born during the period of the contract of mukatabah, or upon whom the contract of mukatabah was enacted and he dies, then first, from his wealth, the total amount of the contract of mukatabah will be paid, and whatever remains will go to his children, not to his brothers.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that if a person makes his slave a mukatab (one who has a contract for freedom) for gold or silver, and sets a condition in the contract such as travel, service, or sacrifice, but specifies this condition, then if the mukatab becomes able to pay his installments before the due time and pays them, but this condition still remains upon him, he will become free, and his sanctity will be complete. Now, regarding this condition, if it is such that the mukatab himself has to fulfill it (like the condition of travel or service), then it will not be obligatory upon the mukatab, nor will the master have the right to demand its fulfillment. And if the condition is such that something has to be given, like the condition of sacrifice or clothing, then it will be like the dirhams and dinars; the value of that thing will be assessed and he will pay it along with his installments. Until he pays it, he will not be free.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that a mukatab is like a slave whom the master sets free after ten years of service. If the master dies and ten years have not passed, then he will complete the ten years of service with the heirs, and the wala’ will go to the one who established his freedom, or to his male offspring or to his asabah (male relatives through the father).
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that if a person stipulates with his mukatab (contracted slave) that he should not travel, or not marry, or not leave his land without his permission, and if he does so, then it will be in his (the master’s) power to annul the contract of manumission. In this case, the annulment of the contract will not be in his power, even if the mukatab does any of these things. If the master annuls the contract of the mukatab, then the mukatab should complain to the judge, who will rule that the contract cannot be annulled. However, it is necessary that the mukatab should not marry, travel, or leave the land without the master’s permission, whether this condition was stipulated or not. The reason for this is that a man contracts his slave for one hundred dinars, and the slave has a thousand dinars with him, so he marries and spends those dinars as dowry, then becomes helpless and returns to the master, having neither wealth nor anything else. In this, there is complete loss for the master. Or the mukatab travels, and the time for the installments arrives, but he is not present, so in this there is hardship for the master. For this reason, it is not proper for the mukatab to marry or travel without the master’s permission; rather, the authority over these matters belongs to the master, whether he permits or forbids.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that if a mukatab (a slave with a contract for freedom) also makes his own slave a mukatab, and then the mukatab of the mukatab is freed before the original mukatab, then his wala’ (right of allegiance) will go to the mawla (master) of the original mukatab until the original mukatab is freed. When the original mukatab is freed, the wala’ of his mukatab will return to him. If the mukatab dies or becomes incapable before paying off the contract, then his free children will not receive the wala’ of their father’s mukatab, because their father did not have the right to wala’, as he was not freed.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that if a mukatab (contracted slave) is jointly owned by two men, and then one of them waives his right but the other does not, and then the mukatab dies and leaves wealth, then the one who did not waive his right will take his due, and whatever wealth remains will be divided between both of them as if he had died in the state of slavery, because the one who waived his right did not set him free, rather he only forgave his own right.
Malik said about the mukatab who is between two men, and one of them leaves to the mukatab what he has against him, and the other withholds, then the mukatab dies and leaves wealth. Malik said: The one who did not leave him anything is to be given what remains due to him. Then they divide the wealth as if he had died a slave, because what was done is not emancipation, but rather he only left what was due to him.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said: The evidence for this is: A man died and left behind a mukatab and also left behind sons and daughters. Then one of the daughters freed her share, so the wala’ would not be established for her. If this had been emancipation, then the wala’ would necessarily be established for her.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that this is also evidence that if a person frees his share and then the mukatab becomes free, the one who freed his share will not have to pay the price of the remaining shares. If this was considered emancipation, then according to the hadith, he would have to pay the price of the shares of the others.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that another proof of this is that the practice of the Muslims, about which there is no difference, is that if a person frees a share from a mukatab, then he will not be freed from his wealth, because if it were so, the wala’ would go to him and not to his partners.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that another proof of this is that the practice of the Muslims is also that the person who enters into a contract of kitabah, the wala’ will go to him, and among the heirs of the master of the mukatab, the women will not receive the wala’, even if they free a portion themselves. Rather, the wala’ will go to the sons of the master of the mukatab or to other male agnates.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that if several slaves are contracted as mukatab (contracted for emancipation) in a single agreement, the master cannot free one of the slaves unless the other mukatab slaves agree. If they are minors, their consent is not considered. The reason for this is that among several slaves, one slave may be very clever and hardworking, and it is expected that through his labor and effort, he may also secure the freedom of the others. The master might then free only that person so that the remaining slaves, being unable to work as hard, would remain slaves. This is not permissible, because it causes harm to the remaining slaves, and the Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said: "There is no harm in Islam."
He said: That is because a man might be striving on behalf of all the people and paying their contract so that their emancipation would be completed through him. Then the master would single out the one who is paying on their behalf, and through whom is their salvation from slavery, and emancipate him. That would be a disadvantage for those who remain, and he only intended by that to gain virtue and increase for himself. So that is not permissible regarding those who remain among them. And the Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said: "There is to be no harm and no reciprocating harm, and this is the greatest harm."
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that if several slaves are contracted for manumission (mukatab), and among them there is a slave who is either extremely old or very young, such that the other slaves do not receive any help from him in fulfilling the payment of the contract, then it is permissible for the master to free him.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that if a person makes his slave a mukatab (one who has a contract for freedom), then the mukatab dies and leaves behind an umm walad (a slave woman who has borne a child to her master), and leaves behind enough wealth to fulfill the contract of kitabah, then that umm walad will become the slave of the mukatab’s master, because the mukatab was not free at the time of his death, nor did he leave behind any offspring by whom the umm walad would also become free.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that if a mukatab frees his slave, or gives some of his wealth in charity, and the master is not informed of this until the mukatab becomes free, then after his freedom, the mukatab cannot invalidate that charity or emancipation. However, if the master is informed of it before the mukatab's freedom and does not give permission, then that charity or emancipation becomes void. In this case, it is not obligatory for the mukatab to free that slave again or give charity after his freedom, but he may do so willingly.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that if a mukatab owes his master one thousand dirhams, and then at the time of death the master forgives one thousand dirhams, the value of the mukatab will be assessed. If his value is one thousand dirhams, then it is as if one-tenth of the contract of manumission has been forgiven, and according to the value, if it is two hundred dirhams, then it is as if one-tenth of the value has been forgiven. Its example is such that if the master forgives the entire amount of the contract, then in the one-third of the wealth, only the value of the mukatab will be considered, that is, one thousand dirhams. If he forgives half, then in the one-third of the wealth, half will be considered. If it is less or more than that, it will also be according to this calculation.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that if a person, at the time of his death, pardons his mukatab from a thousand dirhams, but does not specify in which installment this pardon will apply, whether in the first or the last, then one-tenth will be pardoned from each installment.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that when a man forgives his mukatab (contracted slave) a thousand dirhams either at the beginning or at the end of the contract, and the total amount of the contract is three thousand dirhams, then the value of the mukatab will be assessed, and then this value will be divided for each thousand. The value of the thousand whose term is shorter will be less compared to the thousand that comes after it. Similarly, the thousand that is at the very end will have the least value, because as the term increases, the value decreases accordingly. Then, the value that falls upon the thousand which has been forgiven will be deducted from the one-third of the wealth. If it is less or more than that, it will also be according to this calculation.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said: If a person, at the time of death, made a bequest of a quarter of a mukatab for someone, and freed a quarter, then that person died, and after that the mukatab died and left behind wealth more than the price of his contract of manumission, then the heirs of the master and the legatee will be given as much as the remaining price of the contract of manumission. Then, whatever wealth remains, one third of it will go to the legatee and two thirds to the heirs.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that if a master frees his mukatab at the time of his death, and he cannot be freed from the one-third, then he will be freed to the extent possible, and that much of the price of the contract of manumission will be waived. For example, if the mukatab owed five thousand dirhams and his value was two thousand dirhams, and the deceased's one-third estate is one thousand dirhams, then half of the mukatab will be freed and half of the contract price, that is, two and a half thousand rupees, will be waived.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that if a person made a bequest that a certain slave of his is free and another should be made a mukatab (contracted for freedom), and the one-third of the wealth is not sufficient for both, then freeing (the slave) will take precedence over the mukatabah (contract).
Malik said: If a man remits from his mukatab at the time of death one thousand dirhams from the beginning of his contract or from its end, and the original contract was for three thousand dirhams, the mukatab is valued at the cash value, then that value is divided, and the share of that thousand from the beginning of the contract is given its portion of that value according to its proximity to the term and its advantage. Then the next thousand after the first thousand is given its share also according to its advantage. Then the thousand after that is given its share also according to its advantage, until the end of it is reached. Each thousand has an advantage according to its position in the hastening or delaying of the term; because what is delayed from that is less in value. Then, in the third of the deceased, is placed the amount that corresponds to that thousand from the value, according to the difference, whether it is little or much. Thus, it is according to this calculation.
Malik said: Regarding a man who bequeathed to another man a quarter of a mukatab (a slave with a contract for manumission), or freed a quarter of him. Then the man died, and then the mukatab died and left much wealth, more than what remained upon him. Malik said: The heirs of the master and the one to whom the quarter of the mukatab was bequeathed are given what remains for them upon the mukatab, then they divide what is left over. So, the one to whom the quarter of the mukatab was bequeathed receives a third of what remains after the payment of the contract, and the heirs of his master receive two-thirds. That is because the mukatab is a slave as long as anything remains upon him from his contract, for he is inherited by virtue of his enslavement.
Malik said regarding a mukatab whom his master emancipated at the time of death: He said, if the third of the deceased’s estate does not cover it, then he is emancipated to the extent that the third covers, and the corresponding portion of the contract is waived for him. If the mukatab owes five thousand dirhams and his value is two thousand dirhams in cash, and the third of the deceased’s estate is one thousand dirhams, then half of him is emancipated and half of the contract is waived for him.
Malik said: Regarding a man who said in his will: "My slave boy so-and-so is free, and make a contract of manumission with so-and-so," the emancipation is to be given precedence over the contract of manumission.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that if a person declares his slave woman as mudabbar, and after that she gives birth to children, then if that slave woman dies in the presence of her master, her children will remain mudabbar like their mother. When the master dies and there is room in one third of the wealth, they will be set free.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that the children of every woman will be like their mother, whether she is a mudabbirah, a mukatabah, a mu‘taqah ila ajal, a makhdumah, a mu‘taqat al-ba‘d, a gard, or an umm walad. The children of each will be like their mother: if she is free, then they are free; and if she becomes a slave, then they too will become slaves.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that if a slave woman is made mudabbar while she is pregnant, then her child will also become mudabbar. The example of this is that if a person frees his pregnant slave woman and he did not know that she was pregnant, then her child will also become free.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that similarly, if a person sells a pregnant slave woman, then the slave woman and the child in her womb will belong to the buyer, whether the buyer stipulated this condition or not.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that similarly it is not permissible for the seller to sell a slave-girl and sell her pregnancy, because there is deception in it; perhaps the child will be born or perhaps not. Its example is like a person selling the unborn child in the womb; such a sale is not valid.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that if a mukatab or a mudabbar buys a slave girl and has intercourse with her, and she becomes pregnant and gives birth to a child, then the child of each will follow his father; with his freedom, the child will also be free, and with his slavery, the child will also be a slave. If the mukatab or mudabbar is set free, then the umm walad will be like him and like his mother, and she will be entrusted to him.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that if a mudabbar says to his master: "Set me free now and I will pay you fifty dinars in installments," and the master says: "Alright, you are free, so pay me fifty dinars over five years, ten dinars each year," and the mudabbar agrees to this, then if the master dies after two or three days, the mudabbar will become free, and the fifty dinars will remain as a debt upon him. His testimony will be valid, and all his rights regarding sanctity, inheritance, and legal punishments will be complete, and the death of the master will not reduce anything from those fifty dinars.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that if a person declares his slave as Mudabbar, then dies, and some of his wealth is present while some is absent, and the Mudabbar cannot be freed from the one-third of the wealth that is present, then the Mudabbar will be held back, and his earnings will also be collected, until the absent wealth also appears. Then, if the Mudabbar can be freed from the one-third of the total wealth of the master, he will be freed, and the wealth and earnings of the Mudabbar will belong to him. And if he cannot be completely freed from the one-third, then only the portion equivalent to the one-third will be freed, and his wealth will remain with him.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that as for all bequests of emancipation, whether made in good health or illness, they can be revoked or changed. However, in the case of tadbir, once someone has been made a mudabbar, there is no longer the option to revoke it.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that if someone makes a bequest for the emancipation of a slave woman but does not make her a mudabbara, then her children will not be freed along with their mother, because the master had the right to change this bequest, and freedom was not established for their mother. Rather, it is like someone saying: If such-and-such slave woman remains with me until my death, then she is free. If she remains until his death, then she will be freed, but the master has the right to sell her or her children before death. Thus, according to the ancient Sunnah, there is a great difference between a bequest of emancipation and a bequest of tadbeer. If a bequest were like tadbeer, then no person would have the right to change or alter his bequest.
Malik said: If she attains that, then it is hers. But if he wishes, before that, he may sell her and her child, because he did not include her child in anything that he assigned to her.
He said: And the bequest regarding emancipation is different from tadbir; what has passed from the Sunnah has distinguished between them. He said: And if the bequest were in the same position as tadbir, then every testator would not be able to change his bequest, and what is mentioned in it regarding emancipation, and he would have withheld from his wealth what he could not benefit from.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that if a person, while in good health, declares several of his slaves as mudabbar and possesses no wealth other than them, and if he declared them mudabbar one after the other, then the one who was declared mudabbar first will be freed from one third of the wealth, then the second, then the third, and so on as long as there is room within one third of the wealth. If he declared all of them mudabbar at the same time in a single statement, then one third of each will be freed when all are declared mudabbar during illness.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that if a person declared his slave as Mudabbar and had no other wealth except that, then the master died and the Mudabbar has wealth, one third of the Mudabbar will be set free and the wealth will remain with him.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that if a mudabbar is made a mukatab by his master, then the master dies and leaves nothing except him, then one third of him will be freed, and one third will be deducted from the price of the kitabah, and two thirds will have to be paid by the mudabbar.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that if a person, during his terminal illness, frees half or all of his slave, and he had previously made his slave a mudabbar, then from one-third of the wealth, the mudabbar will be freed first. Then, if the remaining wealth suffices to free the slave, he will be freed; otherwise, he will be freed to the extent of the wealth that remains.
Hazrat Saeed bin Musayyib was asked: If a mukatab (contracted slave) is shared between two men, and one of them frees his share, then the mukatab dies and leaves behind a lot of wealth, what is the ruling? Saeed said: The one who did not free (his share) will take the compensation for his share of the contract, and whatever remains after that will be divided between the two men.
Hadith Referenceموطا امام مالك رواية يحييٰ / كتاب المكاتب / 1299
Hazrat Saeed bin Musayyib was asked: If a mukatab (contracted slave) is shared between two men, and one of them frees his share, then the mukatab dies and leaves behind a lot of wealth, what is the ruling? Saeed said: The one who did not free (his share) will take the compensation for his share of the contract, and whatever remains after that will be divided between the two men.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that in this way, if a person is set free, then his inheritance will go to the closest relative of the one who set him free, whether it is a son or any other male agnate, on the day that the slave died.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that if several brothers are collectively made mukatab, and they have no children who were born during the period of the contract of mukatabah, or who entered into the contract of mukatabah, then those brothers will inherit from one another. If any of them has a son who was born during the period of the contract of mukatabah, or upon whom the contract of mukatabah was enacted and he dies, then first, from his wealth, the total amount of the contract of mukatabah will be paid, and whatever remains will go to his children, not to his brothers.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that if a person makes his slave a mukatab (one who has a contract for freedom) for gold or silver, and sets a condition in the contract such as travel, service, or sacrifice, but specifies this condition, then if the mukatab becomes able to pay his installments before the due time and pays them, but this condition still remains upon him, he will become free, and his sanctity will be complete. Now, regarding this condition, if it is such that the mukatab himself has to fulfill it (like the condition of travel or service), then it will not be obligatory upon the mukatab, nor will the master have the right to demand its fulfillment. And if the condition is such that something has to be given, like the condition of sacrifice or clothing, then it will be like the dirhams and dinars; the value of that thing will be assessed and he will pay it along with his installments. Until he pays it, he will not be free.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that a mukatab is like a slave whom the master sets free after ten years of service. If the master dies and ten years have not passed, then he will complete the ten years of service with the heirs, and the wala’ will go to the one who established his freedom, or to his male offspring or to his asabah (male relatives through the father).
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that if a person stipulates with his mukatab (contracted slave) that he should not travel, or not marry, or not leave his land without his permission, and if he does so, then it will be in his (the master’s) power to annul the contract of manumission. In this case, the annulment of the contract will not be in his power, even if the mukatab does any of these things. If the master annuls the contract of the mukatab, then the mukatab should complain to the judge, who will rule that the contract cannot be annulled. However, it is necessary that the mukatab should not marry, travel, or leave the land without the master’s permission, whether this condition was stipulated or not. The reason for this is that a man contracts his slave for one hundred dinars, and the slave has a thousand dinars with him, so he marries and spends those dinars as dowry, then becomes helpless and returns to the master, having neither wealth nor anything else. In this, there is complete loss for the master. Or the mukatab travels, and the time for the installments arrives, but he is not present, so in this there is hardship for the master. For this reason, it is not proper for the mukatab to marry or travel without the master’s permission; rather, the authority over these matters belongs to the master, whether he permits or forbids.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that if a mukatab (a slave with a contract for freedom) also makes his own slave a mukatab, and then the mukatab of the mukatab is freed before the original mukatab, then his wala’ (right of allegiance) will go to the mawla (master) of the original mukatab until the original mukatab is freed. When the original mukatab is freed, the wala’ of his mukatab will return to him. If the mukatab dies or becomes incapable before paying off the contract, then his free children will not receive the wala’ of their father’s mukatab, because their father did not have the right to wala’, as he was not freed.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that if a mukatab (contracted slave) is jointly owned by two men, and then one of them waives his right but the other does not, and then the mukatab dies and leaves wealth, then the one who did not waive his right will take his due, and whatever wealth remains will be divided between both of them as if he had died in the state of slavery, because the one who waived his right did not set him free, rather he only forgave his own right.
Malik said about the mukatab who is between two men, and one of them leaves to the mukatab what he has against him, and the other withholds, then the mukatab dies and leaves wealth. Malik said: The one who did not leave him anything is to be given what remains due to him. Then they divide the wealth as if he had died a slave, because what was done is not emancipation, but rather he only left what was due to him.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said: The evidence for this is: A man died and left behind a mukatab and also left behind sons and daughters. Then one of the daughters freed her share, so the wala’ would not be established for her. If this had been emancipation, then the wala’ would necessarily be established for her.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that this is also evidence that if a person frees his share and then the mukatab becomes free, the one who freed his share will not have to pay the price of the remaining shares. If this was considered emancipation, then according to the hadith, he would have to pay the price of the shares of the others.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that another proof of this is that the practice of the Muslims, about which there is no difference, is that if a person frees a share from a mukatab, then he will not be freed from his wealth, because if it were so, the wala’ would go to him and not to his partners.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that another proof of this is that the practice of the Muslims is also that the person who enters into a contract of kitabah, the wala’ will go to him, and among the heirs of the master of the mukatab, the women will not receive the wala’, even if they free a portion themselves. Rather, the wala’ will go to the sons of the master of the mukatab or to other male agnates.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that if several slaves are contracted as mukatab (contracted for emancipation) in a single agreement, the master cannot free one of the slaves unless the other mukatab slaves agree. If they are minors, their consent is not considered. The reason for this is that among several slaves, one slave may be very clever and hardworking, and it is expected that through his labor and effort, he may also secure the freedom of the others. The master might then free only that person so that the remaining slaves, being unable to work as hard, would remain slaves. This is not permissible, because it causes harm to the remaining slaves, and the Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said: "There is no harm in Islam."
He said: That is because a man might be striving on behalf of all the people and paying their contract so that their emancipation would be completed through him. Then the master would single out the one who is paying on their behalf, and through whom is their salvation from slavery, and emancipate him. That would be a disadvantage for those who remain, and he only intended by that to gain virtue and increase for himself. So that is not permissible regarding those who remain among them. And the Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said: "There is to be no harm and no reciprocating harm, and this is the greatest harm."
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that if several slaves are contracted for manumission (mukatab), and among them there is a slave who is either extremely old or very young, such that the other slaves do not receive any help from him in fulfilling the payment of the contract, then it is permissible for the master to free him.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that if a person makes his slave a mukatab (one who has a contract for freedom), then the mukatab dies and leaves behind an umm walad (a slave woman who has borne a child to her master), and leaves behind enough wealth to fulfill the contract of kitabah, then that umm walad will become the slave of the mukatab’s master, because the mukatab was not free at the time of his death, nor did he leave behind any offspring by whom the umm walad would also become free.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that if a mukatab frees his slave, or gives some of his wealth in charity, and the master is not informed of this until the mukatab becomes free, then after his freedom, the mukatab cannot invalidate that charity or emancipation. However, if the master is informed of it before the mukatab's freedom and does not give permission, then that charity or emancipation becomes void. In this case, it is not obligatory for the mukatab to free that slave again or give charity after his freedom, but he may do so willingly.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that if a mukatab owes his master one thousand dirhams, and then at the time of death the master forgives one thousand dirhams, the value of the mukatab will be assessed. If his value is one thousand dirhams, then it is as if one-tenth of the contract of manumission has been forgiven, and according to the value, if it is two hundred dirhams, then it is as if one-tenth of the value has been forgiven. Its example is such that if the master forgives the entire amount of the contract, then in the one-third of the wealth, only the value of the mukatab will be considered, that is, one thousand dirhams. If he forgives half, then in the one-third of the wealth, half will be considered. If it is less or more than that, it will also be according to this calculation.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that if a person, at the time of his death, pardons his mukatab from a thousand dirhams, but does not specify in which installment this pardon will apply, whether in the first or the last, then one-tenth will be pardoned from each installment.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that when a man forgives his mukatab (contracted slave) a thousand dirhams either at the beginning or at the end of the contract, and the total amount of the contract is three thousand dirhams, then the value of the mukatab will be assessed, and then this value will be divided for each thousand. The value of the thousand whose term is shorter will be less compared to the thousand that comes after it. Similarly, the thousand that is at the very end will have the least value, because as the term increases, the value decreases accordingly. Then, the value that falls upon the thousand which has been forgiven will be deducted from the one-third of the wealth. If it is less or more than that, it will also be according to this calculation.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said: If a person, at the time of death, made a bequest of a quarter of a mukatab for someone, and freed a quarter, then that person died, and after that the mukatab died and left behind wealth more than the price of his contract of manumission, then the heirs of the master and the legatee will be given as much as the remaining price of the contract of manumission. Then, whatever wealth remains, one third of it will go to the legatee and two thirds to the heirs.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that if a master frees his mukatab at the time of his death, and he cannot be freed from the one-third, then he will be freed to the extent possible, and that much of the price of the contract of manumission will be waived. For example, if the mukatab owed five thousand dirhams and his value was two thousand dirhams, and the deceased's one-third estate is one thousand dirhams, then half of the mukatab will be freed and half of the contract price, that is, two and a half thousand rupees, will be waived.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that if a person made a bequest that a certain slave of his is free and another should be made a mukatab (contracted for freedom), and the one-third of the wealth is not sufficient for both, then freeing (the slave) will take precedence over the mukatabah (contract).
Malik said: If a man remits from his mukatab at the time of death one thousand dirhams from the beginning of his contract or from its end, and the original contract was for three thousand dirhams, the mukatab is valued at the cash value, then that value is divided, and the share of that thousand from the beginning of the contract is given its portion of that value according to its proximity to the term and its advantage. Then the next thousand after the first thousand is given its share also according to its advantage. Then the thousand after that is given its share also according to its advantage, until the end of it is reached. Each thousand has an advantage according to its position in the hastening or delaying of the term; because what is delayed from that is less in value. Then, in the third of the deceased, is placed the amount that corresponds to that thousand from the value, according to the difference, whether it is little or much. Thus, it is according to this calculation.
Malik said: Regarding a man who bequeathed to another man a quarter of a mukatab (a slave with a contract for manumission), or freed a quarter of him. Then the man died, and then the mukatab died and left much wealth, more than what remained upon him. Malik said: The heirs of the master and the one to whom the quarter of the mukatab was bequeathed are given what remains for them upon the mukatab, then they divide what is left over. So, the one to whom the quarter of the mukatab was bequeathed receives a third of what remains after the payment of the contract, and the heirs of his master receive two-thirds. That is because the mukatab is a slave as long as anything remains upon him from his contract, for he is inherited by virtue of his enslavement.
Malik said regarding a mukatab whom his master emancipated at the time of death: He said, if the third of the deceased’s estate does not cover it, then he is emancipated to the extent that the third covers, and the corresponding portion of the contract is waived for him. If the mukatab owes five thousand dirhams and his value is two thousand dirhams in cash, and the third of the deceased’s estate is one thousand dirhams, then half of him is emancipated and half of the contract is waived for him.
Malik said: Regarding a man who said in his will: "My slave boy so-and-so is free, and make a contract of manumission with so-and-so," the emancipation is to be given precedence over the contract of manumission.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that if a person declares his slave woman as mudabbar, and after that she gives birth to children, then if that slave woman dies in the presence of her master, her children will remain mudabbar like their mother. When the master dies and there is room in one third of the wealth, they will be set free.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that the children of every woman will be like their mother, whether she is a mudabbirah, a mukatabah, a mu‘taqah ila ajal, a makhdumah, a mu‘taqat al-ba‘d, a gard, or an umm walad. The children of each will be like their mother: if she is free, then they are free; and if she becomes a slave, then they too will become slaves.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that if a slave woman is made mudabbar while she is pregnant, then her child will also become mudabbar. The example of this is that if a person frees his pregnant slave woman and he did not know that she was pregnant, then her child will also become free.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that similarly, if a person sells a pregnant slave woman, then the slave woman and the child in her womb will belong to the buyer, whether the buyer stipulated this condition or not.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that similarly it is not permissible for the seller to sell a slave-girl and sell her pregnancy, because there is deception in it; perhaps the child will be born or perhaps not. Its example is like a person selling the unborn child in the womb; such a sale is not valid.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that if a mukatab or a mudabbar buys a slave girl and has intercourse with her, and she becomes pregnant and gives birth to a child, then the child of each will follow his father; with his freedom, the child will also be free, and with his slavery, the child will also be a slave. If the mukatab or mudabbar is set free, then the umm walad will be like him and like his mother, and she will be entrusted to him.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that if a mudabbar says to his master: "Set me free now and I will pay you fifty dinars in installments," and the master says: "Alright, you are free, so pay me fifty dinars over five years, ten dinars each year," and the mudabbar agrees to this, then if the master dies after two or three days, the mudabbar will become free, and the fifty dinars will remain as a debt upon him. His testimony will be valid, and all his rights regarding sanctity, inheritance, and legal punishments will be complete, and the death of the master will not reduce anything from those fifty dinars.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that if a person declares his slave as Mudabbar, then dies, and some of his wealth is present while some is absent, and the Mudabbar cannot be freed from the one-third of the wealth that is present, then the Mudabbar will be held back, and his earnings will also be collected, until the absent wealth also appears. Then, if the Mudabbar can be freed from the one-third of the total wealth of the master, he will be freed, and the wealth and earnings of the Mudabbar will belong to him. And if he cannot be completely freed from the one-third, then only the portion equivalent to the one-third will be freed, and his wealth will remain with him.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that as for all bequests of emancipation, whether made in good health or illness, they can be revoked or changed. However, in the case of tadbir, once someone has been made a mudabbar, there is no longer the option to revoke it.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that if someone makes a bequest for the emancipation of a slave woman but does not make her a mudabbara, then her children will not be freed along with their mother, because the master had the right to change this bequest, and freedom was not established for their mother. Rather, it is like someone saying: If such-and-such slave woman remains with me until my death, then she is free. If she remains until his death, then she will be freed, but the master has the right to sell her or her children before death. Thus, according to the ancient Sunnah, there is a great difference between a bequest of emancipation and a bequest of tadbeer. If a bequest were like tadbeer, then no person would have the right to change or alter his bequest.
Malik said: If she attains that, then it is hers. But if he wishes, before that, he may sell her and her child, because he did not include her child in anything that he assigned to her.
He said: And the bequest regarding emancipation is different from tadbir; what has passed from the Sunnah has distinguished between them. He said: And if the bequest were in the same position as tadbir, then every testator would not be able to change his bequest, and what is mentioned in it regarding emancipation, and he would have withheld from his wealth what he could not benefit from.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that if a person, while in good health, declares several of his slaves as mudabbar and possesses no wealth other than them, and if he declared them mudabbar one after the other, then the one who was declared mudabbar first will be freed from one third of the wealth, then the second, then the third, and so on as long as there is room within one third of the wealth. If he declared all of them mudabbar at the same time in a single statement, then one third of each will be freed when all are declared mudabbar during illness.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that if a person declared his slave as Mudabbar and had no other wealth except that, then the master died and the Mudabbar has wealth, one third of the Mudabbar will be set free and the wealth will remain with him.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that if a mudabbar is made a mukatab by his master, then the master dies and leaves nothing except him, then one third of him will be freed, and one third will be deducted from the price of the kitabah, and two thirds will have to be paid by the mudabbar.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that if a person, during his terminal illness, frees half or all of his slave, and he had previously made his slave a mudabbar, then from one-third of the wealth, the mudabbar will be freed first. Then, if the remaining wealth suffices to free the slave, he will be freed; otherwise, he will be freed to the extent of the wealth that remains.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that when a mukatab becomes free, his heir will be the person who made him a mukatab, or the closest male relative among the mukatab's relatives on the day the mukatab dies, whether it is a son or another 'asaba (male agnate).
Hadith Referenceموطا امام مالك رواية يحييٰ / كتاب المكاتب / 1299
Hazrat Saeed bin Musayyib was asked: If a mukatab (contracted slave) is shared between two men, and one of them frees his share, then the mukatab dies and leaves behind a lot of wealth, what is the ruling? Saeed said: The one who did not free (his share) will take the compensation for his share of the contract, and whatever remains after that will be divided between the two men.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that when a mukatab becomes free, his heir will be the person who made him a mukatab, or the closest male relative among the mukatab's relatives on the day the mukatab dies, whether it is a son or another 'asaba (male agnate).
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that if several brothers are collectively made mukatab, and they have no children who were born during the period of the contract of mukatabah, or who entered into the contract of mukatabah, then those brothers will inherit from one another. If any of them has a son who was born during the period of the contract of mukatabah, or upon whom the contract of mukatabah was enacted and he dies, then first, from his wealth, the total amount of the contract of mukatabah will be paid, and whatever remains will go to his children, not to his brothers.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that if a person makes his slave a mukatab (one who has a contract for freedom) for gold or silver, and sets a condition in the contract such as travel, service, or sacrifice, but specifies this condition, then if the mukatab becomes able to pay his installments before the due time and pays them, but this condition still remains upon him, he will become free, and his sanctity will be complete. Now, regarding this condition, if it is such that the mukatab himself has to fulfill it (like the condition of travel or service), then it will not be obligatory upon the mukatab, nor will the master have the right to demand its fulfillment. And if the condition is such that something has to be given, like the condition of sacrifice or clothing, then it will be like the dirhams and dinars; the value of that thing will be assessed and he will pay it along with his installments. Until he pays it, he will not be free.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that a mukatab is like a slave whom the master sets free after ten years of service. If the master dies and ten years have not passed, then he will complete the ten years of service with the heirs, and the wala’ will go to the one who established his freedom, or to his male offspring or to his asabah (male relatives through the father).
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that if a person stipulates with his mukatab (contracted slave) that he should not travel, or not marry, or not leave his land without his permission, and if he does so, then it will be in his (the master’s) power to annul the contract of manumission. In this case, the annulment of the contract will not be in his power, even if the mukatab does any of these things. If the master annuls the contract of the mukatab, then the mukatab should complain to the judge, who will rule that the contract cannot be annulled. However, it is necessary that the mukatab should not marry, travel, or leave the land without the master’s permission, whether this condition was stipulated or not. The reason for this is that a man contracts his slave for one hundred dinars, and the slave has a thousand dinars with him, so he marries and spends those dinars as dowry, then becomes helpless and returns to the master, having neither wealth nor anything else. In this, there is complete loss for the master. Or the mukatab travels, and the time for the installments arrives, but he is not present, so in this there is hardship for the master. For this reason, it is not proper for the mukatab to marry or travel without the master’s permission; rather, the authority over these matters belongs to the master, whether he permits or forbids.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that if a mukatab (a slave with a contract for freedom) also makes his own slave a mukatab, and then the mukatab of the mukatab is freed before the original mukatab, then his wala’ (right of allegiance) will go to the mawla (master) of the original mukatab until the original mukatab is freed. When the original mukatab is freed, the wala’ of his mukatab will return to him. If the mukatab dies or becomes incapable before paying off the contract, then his free children will not receive the wala’ of their father’s mukatab, because their father did not have the right to wala’, as he was not freed.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that if a mukatab (contracted slave) is jointly owned by two men, and then one of them waives his right but the other does not, and then the mukatab dies and leaves wealth, then the one who did not waive his right will take his due, and whatever wealth remains will be divided between both of them as if he had died in the state of slavery, because the one who waived his right did not set him free, rather he only forgave his own right.
Malik said about the mukatab who is between two men, and one of them leaves to the mukatab what he has against him, and the other withholds, then the mukatab dies and leaves wealth. Malik said: The one who did not leave him anything is to be given what remains due to him. Then they divide the wealth as if he had died a slave, because what was done is not emancipation, but rather he only left what was due to him.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said: The evidence for this is: A man died and left behind a mukatab and also left behind sons and daughters. Then one of the daughters freed her share, so the wala’ would not be established for her. If this had been emancipation, then the wala’ would necessarily be established for her.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that this is also evidence that if a person frees his share and then the mukatab becomes free, the one who freed his share will not have to pay the price of the remaining shares. If this was considered emancipation, then according to the hadith, he would have to pay the price of the shares of the others.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that another proof of this is that the practice of the Muslims, about which there is no difference, is that if a person frees a share from a mukatab, then he will not be freed from his wealth, because if it were so, the wala’ would go to him and not to his partners.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that another proof of this is that the practice of the Muslims is also that the person who enters into a contract of kitabah, the wala’ will go to him, and among the heirs of the master of the mukatab, the women will not receive the wala’, even if they free a portion themselves. Rather, the wala’ will go to the sons of the master of the mukatab or to other male agnates.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that if several slaves are contracted as mukatab (contracted for emancipation) in a single agreement, the master cannot free one of the slaves unless the other mukatab slaves agree. If they are minors, their consent is not considered. The reason for this is that among several slaves, one slave may be very clever and hardworking, and it is expected that through his labor and effort, he may also secure the freedom of the others. The master might then free only that person so that the remaining slaves, being unable to work as hard, would remain slaves. This is not permissible, because it causes harm to the remaining slaves, and the Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said: "There is no harm in Islam."
He said: That is because a man might be striving on behalf of all the people and paying their contract so that their emancipation would be completed through him. Then the master would single out the one who is paying on their behalf, and through whom is their salvation from slavery, and emancipate him. That would be a disadvantage for those who remain, and he only intended by that to gain virtue and increase for himself. So that is not permissible regarding those who remain among them. And the Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said: "There is to be no harm and no reciprocating harm, and this is the greatest harm."
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that if several slaves are contracted for manumission (mukatab), and among them there is a slave who is either extremely old or very young, such that the other slaves do not receive any help from him in fulfilling the payment of the contract, then it is permissible for the master to free him.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that if a person makes his slave a mukatab (one who has a contract for freedom), then the mukatab dies and leaves behind an umm walad (a slave woman who has borne a child to her master), and leaves behind enough wealth to fulfill the contract of kitabah, then that umm walad will become the slave of the mukatab’s master, because the mukatab was not free at the time of his death, nor did he leave behind any offspring by whom the umm walad would also become free.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that if a mukatab frees his slave, or gives some of his wealth in charity, and the master is not informed of this until the mukatab becomes free, then after his freedom, the mukatab cannot invalidate that charity or emancipation. However, if the master is informed of it before the mukatab's freedom and does not give permission, then that charity or emancipation becomes void. In this case, it is not obligatory for the mukatab to free that slave again or give charity after his freedom, but he may do so willingly.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that if a mukatab owes his master one thousand dirhams, and then at the time of death the master forgives one thousand dirhams, the value of the mukatab will be assessed. If his value is one thousand dirhams, then it is as if one-tenth of the contract of manumission has been forgiven, and according to the value, if it is two hundred dirhams, then it is as if one-tenth of the value has been forgiven. Its example is such that if the master forgives the entire amount of the contract, then in the one-third of the wealth, only the value of the mukatab will be considered, that is, one thousand dirhams. If he forgives half, then in the one-third of the wealth, half will be considered. If it is less or more than that, it will also be according to this calculation.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that if a person, at the time of his death, pardons his mukatab from a thousand dirhams, but does not specify in which installment this pardon will apply, whether in the first or the last, then one-tenth will be pardoned from each installment.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that when a man forgives his mukatab (contracted slave) a thousand dirhams either at the beginning or at the end of the contract, and the total amount of the contract is three thousand dirhams, then the value of the mukatab will be assessed, and then this value will be divided for each thousand. The value of the thousand whose term is shorter will be less compared to the thousand that comes after it. Similarly, the thousand that is at the very end will have the least value, because as the term increases, the value decreases accordingly. Then, the value that falls upon the thousand which has been forgiven will be deducted from the one-third of the wealth. If it is less or more than that, it will also be according to this calculation.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said: If a person, at the time of death, made a bequest of a quarter of a mukatab for someone, and freed a quarter, then that person died, and after that the mukatab died and left behind wealth more than the price of his contract of manumission, then the heirs of the master and the legatee will be given as much as the remaining price of the contract of manumission. Then, whatever wealth remains, one third of it will go to the legatee and two thirds to the heirs.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that if a master frees his mukatab at the time of his death, and he cannot be freed from the one-third, then he will be freed to the extent possible, and that much of the price of the contract of manumission will be waived. For example, if the mukatab owed five thousand dirhams and his value was two thousand dirhams, and the deceased's one-third estate is one thousand dirhams, then half of the mukatab will be freed and half of the contract price, that is, two and a half thousand rupees, will be waived.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that if a person made a bequest that a certain slave of his is free and another should be made a mukatab (contracted for freedom), and the one-third of the wealth is not sufficient for both, then freeing (the slave) will take precedence over the mukatabah (contract).
Malik said: If a man remits from his mukatab at the time of death one thousand dirhams from the beginning of his contract or from its end, and the original contract was for three thousand dirhams, the mukatab is valued at the cash value, then that value is divided, and the share of that thousand from the beginning of the contract is given its portion of that value according to its proximity to the term and its advantage. Then the next thousand after the first thousand is given its share also according to its advantage. Then the thousand after that is given its share also according to its advantage, until the end of it is reached. Each thousand has an advantage according to its position in the hastening or delaying of the term; because what is delayed from that is less in value. Then, in the third of the deceased, is placed the amount that corresponds to that thousand from the value, according to the difference, whether it is little or much. Thus, it is according to this calculation.
Malik said: Regarding a man who bequeathed to another man a quarter of a mukatab (a slave with a contract for manumission), or freed a quarter of him. Then the man died, and then the mukatab died and left much wealth, more than what remained upon him. Malik said: The heirs of the master and the one to whom the quarter of the mukatab was bequeathed are given what remains for them upon the mukatab, then they divide what is left over. So, the one to whom the quarter of the mukatab was bequeathed receives a third of what remains after the payment of the contract, and the heirs of his master receive two-thirds. That is because the mukatab is a slave as long as anything remains upon him from his contract, for he is inherited by virtue of his enslavement.
Malik said regarding a mukatab whom his master emancipated at the time of death: He said, if the third of the deceased’s estate does not cover it, then he is emancipated to the extent that the third covers, and the corresponding portion of the contract is waived for him. If the mukatab owes five thousand dirhams and his value is two thousand dirhams in cash, and the third of the deceased’s estate is one thousand dirhams, then half of him is emancipated and half of the contract is waived for him.
Malik said: Regarding a man who said in his will: "My slave boy so-and-so is free, and make a contract of manumission with so-and-so," the emancipation is to be given precedence over the contract of manumission.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that if a person declares his slave woman as mudabbar, and after that she gives birth to children, then if that slave woman dies in the presence of her master, her children will remain mudabbar like their mother. When the master dies and there is room in one third of the wealth, they will be set free.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that the children of every woman will be like their mother, whether she is a mudabbirah, a mukatabah, a mu‘taqah ila ajal, a makhdumah, a mu‘taqat al-ba‘d, a gard, or an umm walad. The children of each will be like their mother: if she is free, then they are free; and if she becomes a slave, then they too will become slaves.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that if a slave woman is made mudabbar while she is pregnant, then her child will also become mudabbar. The example of this is that if a person frees his pregnant slave woman and he did not know that she was pregnant, then her child will also become free.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that similarly, if a person sells a pregnant slave woman, then the slave woman and the child in her womb will belong to the buyer, whether the buyer stipulated this condition or not.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that similarly it is not permissible for the seller to sell a slave-girl and sell her pregnancy, because there is deception in it; perhaps the child will be born or perhaps not. Its example is like a person selling the unborn child in the womb; such a sale is not valid.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that if a mukatab or a mudabbar buys a slave girl and has intercourse with her, and she becomes pregnant and gives birth to a child, then the child of each will follow his father; with his freedom, the child will also be free, and with his slavery, the child will also be a slave. If the mukatab or mudabbar is set free, then the umm walad will be like him and like his mother, and she will be entrusted to him.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that if a mudabbar says to his master: "Set me free now and I will pay you fifty dinars in installments," and the master says: "Alright, you are free, so pay me fifty dinars over five years, ten dinars each year," and the mudabbar agrees to this, then if the master dies after two or three days, the mudabbar will become free, and the fifty dinars will remain as a debt upon him. His testimony will be valid, and all his rights regarding sanctity, inheritance, and legal punishments will be complete, and the death of the master will not reduce anything from those fifty dinars.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that if a person declares his slave as Mudabbar, then dies, and some of his wealth is present while some is absent, and the Mudabbar cannot be freed from the one-third of the wealth that is present, then the Mudabbar will be held back, and his earnings will also be collected, until the absent wealth also appears. Then, if the Mudabbar can be freed from the one-third of the total wealth of the master, he will be freed, and the wealth and earnings of the Mudabbar will belong to him. And if he cannot be completely freed from the one-third, then only the portion equivalent to the one-third will be freed, and his wealth will remain with him.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that as for all bequests of emancipation, whether made in good health or illness, they can be revoked or changed. However, in the case of tadbir, once someone has been made a mudabbar, there is no longer the option to revoke it.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that if someone makes a bequest for the emancipation of a slave woman but does not make her a mudabbara, then her children will not be freed along with their mother, because the master had the right to change this bequest, and freedom was not established for their mother. Rather, it is like someone saying: If such-and-such slave woman remains with me until my death, then she is free. If she remains until his death, then she will be freed, but the master has the right to sell her or her children before death. Thus, according to the ancient Sunnah, there is a great difference between a bequest of emancipation and a bequest of tadbeer. If a bequest were like tadbeer, then no person would have the right to change or alter his bequest.
Malik said: If she attains that, then it is hers. But if he wishes, before that, he may sell her and her child, because he did not include her child in anything that he assigned to her.
He said: And the bequest regarding emancipation is different from tadbir; what has passed from the Sunnah has distinguished between them. He said: And if the bequest were in the same position as tadbir, then every testator would not be able to change his bequest, and what is mentioned in it regarding emancipation, and he would have withheld from his wealth what he could not benefit from.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that if a person, while in good health, declares several of his slaves as mudabbar and possesses no wealth other than them, and if he declared them mudabbar one after the other, then the one who was declared mudabbar first will be freed from one third of the wealth, then the second, then the third, and so on as long as there is room within one third of the wealth. If he declared all of them mudabbar at the same time in a single statement, then one third of each will be freed when all are declared mudabbar during illness.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that if a person declared his slave as Mudabbar and had no other wealth except that, then the master died and the Mudabbar has wealth, one third of the Mudabbar will be set free and the wealth will remain with him.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that if a mudabbar is made a mukatab by his master, then the master dies and leaves nothing except him, then one third of him will be freed, and one third will be deducted from the price of the kitabah, and two thirds will have to be paid by the mudabbar.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that if a person, during his terminal illness, frees half or all of his slave, and he had previously made his slave a mudabbar, then from one-third of the wealth, the mudabbar will be freed first. Then, if the remaining wealth suffices to free the slave, he will be freed; otherwise, he will be freed to the extent of the wealth that remains.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that in this way, if a person is set free, then his inheritance will go to the closest relative of the one who set him free, whether it is a son or any other male agnate, on the day that the slave died.
Hadith Referenceموطا امام مالك رواية يحييٰ / كتاب المكاتب / 1299
Hazrat Saeed bin Musayyib was asked: If a mukatab (contracted slave) is shared between two men, and one of them frees his share, then the mukatab dies and leaves behind a lot of wealth, what is the ruling? Saeed said: The one who did not free (his share) will take the compensation for his share of the contract, and whatever remains after that will be divided between the two men.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that when a mukatab becomes free, his heir will be the person who made him a mukatab, or the closest male relative among the mukatab's relatives on the day the mukatab dies, whether it is a son or another 'asaba (male agnate).
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that in this way, if a person is set free, then his inheritance will go to the closest relative of the one who set him free, whether it is a son or any other male agnate, on the day that the slave died.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that if a person makes his slave a mukatab (one who has a contract for freedom) for gold or silver, and sets a condition in the contract such as travel, service, or sacrifice, but specifies this condition, then if the mukatab becomes able to pay his installments before the due time and pays them, but this condition still remains upon him, he will become free, and his sanctity will be complete. Now, regarding this condition, if it is such that the mukatab himself has to fulfill it (like the condition of travel or service), then it will not be obligatory upon the mukatab, nor will the master have the right to demand its fulfillment. And if the condition is such that something has to be given, like the condition of sacrifice or clothing, then it will be like the dirhams and dinars; the value of that thing will be assessed and he will pay it along with his installments. Until he pays it, he will not be free.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that a mukatab is like a slave whom the master sets free after ten years of service. If the master dies and ten years have not passed, then he will complete the ten years of service with the heirs, and the wala’ will go to the one who established his freedom, or to his male offspring or to his asabah (male relatives through the father).
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that if a person stipulates with his mukatab (contracted slave) that he should not travel, or not marry, or not leave his land without his permission, and if he does so, then it will be in his (the master’s) power to annul the contract of manumission. In this case, the annulment of the contract will not be in his power, even if the mukatab does any of these things. If the master annuls the contract of the mukatab, then the mukatab should complain to the judge, who will rule that the contract cannot be annulled. However, it is necessary that the mukatab should not marry, travel, or leave the land without the master’s permission, whether this condition was stipulated or not. The reason for this is that a man contracts his slave for one hundred dinars, and the slave has a thousand dinars with him, so he marries and spends those dinars as dowry, then becomes helpless and returns to the master, having neither wealth nor anything else. In this, there is complete loss for the master. Or the mukatab travels, and the time for the installments arrives, but he is not present, so in this there is hardship for the master. For this reason, it is not proper for the mukatab to marry or travel without the master’s permission; rather, the authority over these matters belongs to the master, whether he permits or forbids.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that if a mukatab (a slave with a contract for freedom) also makes his own slave a mukatab, and then the mukatab of the mukatab is freed before the original mukatab, then his wala’ (right of allegiance) will go to the mawla (master) of the original mukatab until the original mukatab is freed. When the original mukatab is freed, the wala’ of his mukatab will return to him. If the mukatab dies or becomes incapable before paying off the contract, then his free children will not receive the wala’ of their father’s mukatab, because their father did not have the right to wala’, as he was not freed.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that if a mukatab (contracted slave) is jointly owned by two men, and then one of them waives his right but the other does not, and then the mukatab dies and leaves wealth, then the one who did not waive his right will take his due, and whatever wealth remains will be divided between both of them as if he had died in the state of slavery, because the one who waived his right did not set him free, rather he only forgave his own right.
Malik said about the mukatab who is between two men, and one of them leaves to the mukatab what he has against him, and the other withholds, then the mukatab dies and leaves wealth. Malik said: The one who did not leave him anything is to be given what remains due to him. Then they divide the wealth as if he had died a slave, because what was done is not emancipation, but rather he only left what was due to him.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said: The evidence for this is: A man died and left behind a mukatab and also left behind sons and daughters. Then one of the daughters freed her share, so the wala’ would not be established for her. If this had been emancipation, then the wala’ would necessarily be established for her.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that this is also evidence that if a person frees his share and then the mukatab becomes free, the one who freed his share will not have to pay the price of the remaining shares. If this was considered emancipation, then according to the hadith, he would have to pay the price of the shares of the others.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that another proof of this is that the practice of the Muslims, about which there is no difference, is that if a person frees a share from a mukatab, then he will not be freed from his wealth, because if it were so, the wala’ would go to him and not to his partners.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that another proof of this is that the practice of the Muslims is also that the person who enters into a contract of kitabah, the wala’ will go to him, and among the heirs of the master of the mukatab, the women will not receive the wala’, even if they free a portion themselves. Rather, the wala’ will go to the sons of the master of the mukatab or to other male agnates.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that if several slaves are contracted as mukatab (contracted for emancipation) in a single agreement, the master cannot free one of the slaves unless the other mukatab slaves agree. If they are minors, their consent is not considered. The reason for this is that among several slaves, one slave may be very clever and hardworking, and it is expected that through his labor and effort, he may also secure the freedom of the others. The master might then free only that person so that the remaining slaves, being unable to work as hard, would remain slaves. This is not permissible, because it causes harm to the remaining slaves, and the Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said: "There is no harm in Islam."
He said: That is because a man might be striving on behalf of all the people and paying their contract so that their emancipation would be completed through him. Then the master would single out the one who is paying on their behalf, and through whom is their salvation from slavery, and emancipate him. That would be a disadvantage for those who remain, and he only intended by that to gain virtue and increase for himself. So that is not permissible regarding those who remain among them. And the Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said: "There is to be no harm and no reciprocating harm, and this is the greatest harm."
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that if several slaves are contracted for manumission (mukatab), and among them there is a slave who is either extremely old or very young, such that the other slaves do not receive any help from him in fulfilling the payment of the contract, then it is permissible for the master to free him.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that if a person makes his slave a mukatab (one who has a contract for freedom), then the mukatab dies and leaves behind an umm walad (a slave woman who has borne a child to her master), and leaves behind enough wealth to fulfill the contract of kitabah, then that umm walad will become the slave of the mukatab’s master, because the mukatab was not free at the time of his death, nor did he leave behind any offspring by whom the umm walad would also become free.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that if a mukatab frees his slave, or gives some of his wealth in charity, and the master is not informed of this until the mukatab becomes free, then after his freedom, the mukatab cannot invalidate that charity or emancipation. However, if the master is informed of it before the mukatab's freedom and does not give permission, then that charity or emancipation becomes void. In this case, it is not obligatory for the mukatab to free that slave again or give charity after his freedom, but he may do so willingly.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that if a mukatab owes his master one thousand dirhams, and then at the time of death the master forgives one thousand dirhams, the value of the mukatab will be assessed. If his value is one thousand dirhams, then it is as if one-tenth of the contract of manumission has been forgiven, and according to the value, if it is two hundred dirhams, then it is as if one-tenth of the value has been forgiven. Its example is such that if the master forgives the entire amount of the contract, then in the one-third of the wealth, only the value of the mukatab will be considered, that is, one thousand dirhams. If he forgives half, then in the one-third of the wealth, half will be considered. If it is less or more than that, it will also be according to this calculation.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that if a person, at the time of his death, pardons his mukatab from a thousand dirhams, but does not specify in which installment this pardon will apply, whether in the first or the last, then one-tenth will be pardoned from each installment.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that when a man forgives his mukatab (contracted slave) a thousand dirhams either at the beginning or at the end of the contract, and the total amount of the contract is three thousand dirhams, then the value of the mukatab will be assessed, and then this value will be divided for each thousand. The value of the thousand whose term is shorter will be less compared to the thousand that comes after it. Similarly, the thousand that is at the very end will have the least value, because as the term increases, the value decreases accordingly. Then, the value that falls upon the thousand which has been forgiven will be deducted from the one-third of the wealth. If it is less or more than that, it will also be according to this calculation.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said: If a person, at the time of death, made a bequest of a quarter of a mukatab for someone, and freed a quarter, then that person died, and after that the mukatab died and left behind wealth more than the price of his contract of manumission, then the heirs of the master and the legatee will be given as much as the remaining price of the contract of manumission. Then, whatever wealth remains, one third of it will go to the legatee and two thirds to the heirs.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that if a master frees his mukatab at the time of his death, and he cannot be freed from the one-third, then he will be freed to the extent possible, and that much of the price of the contract of manumission will be waived. For example, if the mukatab owed five thousand dirhams and his value was two thousand dirhams, and the deceased's one-third estate is one thousand dirhams, then half of the mukatab will be freed and half of the contract price, that is, two and a half thousand rupees, will be waived.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that if a person made a bequest that a certain slave of his is free and another should be made a mukatab (contracted for freedom), and the one-third of the wealth is not sufficient for both, then freeing (the slave) will take precedence over the mukatabah (contract).
Malik said: If a man remits from his mukatab at the time of death one thousand dirhams from the beginning of his contract or from its end, and the original contract was for three thousand dirhams, the mukatab is valued at the cash value, then that value is divided, and the share of that thousand from the beginning of the contract is given its portion of that value according to its proximity to the term and its advantage. Then the next thousand after the first thousand is given its share also according to its advantage. Then the thousand after that is given its share also according to its advantage, until the end of it is reached. Each thousand has an advantage according to its position in the hastening or delaying of the term; because what is delayed from that is less in value. Then, in the third of the deceased, is placed the amount that corresponds to that thousand from the value, according to the difference, whether it is little or much. Thus, it is according to this calculation.
Malik said: Regarding a man who bequeathed to another man a quarter of a mukatab (a slave with a contract for manumission), or freed a quarter of him. Then the man died, and then the mukatab died and left much wealth, more than what remained upon him. Malik said: The heirs of the master and the one to whom the quarter of the mukatab was bequeathed are given what remains for them upon the mukatab, then they divide what is left over. So, the one to whom the quarter of the mukatab was bequeathed receives a third of what remains after the payment of the contract, and the heirs of his master receive two-thirds. That is because the mukatab is a slave as long as anything remains upon him from his contract, for he is inherited by virtue of his enslavement.
Malik said regarding a mukatab whom his master emancipated at the time of death: He said, if the third of the deceased’s estate does not cover it, then he is emancipated to the extent that the third covers, and the corresponding portion of the contract is waived for him. If the mukatab owes five thousand dirhams and his value is two thousand dirhams in cash, and the third of the deceased’s estate is one thousand dirhams, then half of him is emancipated and half of the contract is waived for him.
Malik said: Regarding a man who said in his will: "My slave boy so-and-so is free, and make a contract of manumission with so-and-so," the emancipation is to be given precedence over the contract of manumission.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that if a person declares his slave woman as mudabbar, and after that she gives birth to children, then if that slave woman dies in the presence of her master, her children will remain mudabbar like their mother. When the master dies and there is room in one third of the wealth, they will be set free.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that the children of every woman will be like their mother, whether she is a mudabbirah, a mukatabah, a mu‘taqah ila ajal, a makhdumah, a mu‘taqat al-ba‘d, a gard, or an umm walad. The children of each will be like their mother: if she is free, then they are free; and if she becomes a slave, then they too will become slaves.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that if a slave woman is made mudabbar while she is pregnant, then her child will also become mudabbar. The example of this is that if a person frees his pregnant slave woman and he did not know that she was pregnant, then her child will also become free.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that similarly, if a person sells a pregnant slave woman, then the slave woman and the child in her womb will belong to the buyer, whether the buyer stipulated this condition or not.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that similarly it is not permissible for the seller to sell a slave-girl and sell her pregnancy, because there is deception in it; perhaps the child will be born or perhaps not. Its example is like a person selling the unborn child in the womb; such a sale is not valid.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that if a mukatab or a mudabbar buys a slave girl and has intercourse with her, and she becomes pregnant and gives birth to a child, then the child of each will follow his father; with his freedom, the child will also be free, and with his slavery, the child will also be a slave. If the mukatab or mudabbar is set free, then the umm walad will be like him and like his mother, and she will be entrusted to him.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that if a mudabbar says to his master: "Set me free now and I will pay you fifty dinars in installments," and the master says: "Alright, you are free, so pay me fifty dinars over five years, ten dinars each year," and the mudabbar agrees to this, then if the master dies after two or three days, the mudabbar will become free, and the fifty dinars will remain as a debt upon him. His testimony will be valid, and all his rights regarding sanctity, inheritance, and legal punishments will be complete, and the death of the master will not reduce anything from those fifty dinars.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that if a person declares his slave as Mudabbar, then dies, and some of his wealth is present while some is absent, and the Mudabbar cannot be freed from the one-third of the wealth that is present, then the Mudabbar will be held back, and his earnings will also be collected, until the absent wealth also appears. Then, if the Mudabbar can be freed from the one-third of the total wealth of the master, he will be freed, and the wealth and earnings of the Mudabbar will belong to him. And if he cannot be completely freed from the one-third, then only the portion equivalent to the one-third will be freed, and his wealth will remain with him.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that as for all bequests of emancipation, whether made in good health or illness, they can be revoked or changed. However, in the case of tadbir, once someone has been made a mudabbar, there is no longer the option to revoke it.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that if someone makes a bequest for the emancipation of a slave woman but does not make her a mudabbara, then her children will not be freed along with their mother, because the master had the right to change this bequest, and freedom was not established for their mother. Rather, it is like someone saying: If such-and-such slave woman remains with me until my death, then she is free. If she remains until his death, then she will be freed, but the master has the right to sell her or her children before death. Thus, according to the ancient Sunnah, there is a great difference between a bequest of emancipation and a bequest of tadbeer. If a bequest were like tadbeer, then no person would have the right to change or alter his bequest.
Malik said: If she attains that, then it is hers. But if he wishes, before that, he may sell her and her child, because he did not include her child in anything that he assigned to her.
He said: And the bequest regarding emancipation is different from tadbir; what has passed from the Sunnah has distinguished between them. He said: And if the bequest were in the same position as tadbir, then every testator would not be able to change his bequest, and what is mentioned in it regarding emancipation, and he would have withheld from his wealth what he could not benefit from.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that if a person, while in good health, declares several of his slaves as mudabbar and possesses no wealth other than them, and if he declared them mudabbar one after the other, then the one who was declared mudabbar first will be freed from one third of the wealth, then the second, then the third, and so on as long as there is room within one third of the wealth. If he declared all of them mudabbar at the same time in a single statement, then one third of each will be freed when all are declared mudabbar during illness.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that if a person declared his slave as Mudabbar and had no other wealth except that, then the master died and the Mudabbar has wealth, one third of the Mudabbar will be set free and the wealth will remain with him.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that if a mudabbar is made a mukatab by his master, then the master dies and leaves nothing except him, then one third of him will be freed, and one third will be deducted from the price of the kitabah, and two thirds will have to be paid by the mudabbar.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that if a person, during his terminal illness, frees half or all of his slave, and he had previously made his slave a mudabbar, then from one-third of the wealth, the mudabbar will be freed first. Then, if the remaining wealth suffices to free the slave, he will be freed; otherwise, he will be freed to the extent of the wealth that remains.
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said that if several brothers are collectively made mukatab, and they have no children who were born during the period of the contract of mukatabah, or who entered into the contract of mukatabah, then those brothers will inherit from one another. If any of them has a son who was born during the period of the contract of mukatabah, or upon whom the contract of mukatabah was enacted and he dies, then first, from his wealth, the total amount of the contract of mukatabah will be paid, and whatever remains will go to his children, not to his brothers.
Hadith Referenceموطا امام مالك رواية يحييٰ / كتاب المكاتب / 1299