Toggle above to switch between keyword search and direct hadith lookup
موطا امام مالك رواية يحييٰ
Muwatta Malik (Yahya)
كتاب الحدودBook: On the Explanation of Hudud (Prescribed Punishments)
بَابُ الْحَدِّ فِي الْقَذْفِ وَالنَّفْيِ وَالتَّعْرِيضِPunishment for slander, exile, and insinuation
Hadith 1560
اُردوEn
قَالَ مَالِك : لَا حَدَّ عِنْدَنَا إِلَّا فِي نَفْيٍ أَوْ قَذْفٍ أَوْ تَعْرِيضٍ، يُرَى أَنَّ قَائِلَهُ إِنَّمَا أَرَادَ بِذَلِكَ نَفْيًا أَوْ قَذْفًا، فَعَلَى مَنْ قَالَ ذَلِكَ الْحَدُّ تَامًّا .
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said: In our view, there is no hadd except in cases of qadhf (false accusation of adultery), or nafiy (denial, meaning to deny lineage, for example, to say, "You are not your father's son"), or in ta'reez (that is, to insult someone through insinuation or indirect reference, as has just been mentioned). In all these cases, the full hadd will be obligatory, but it is necessary that it becomes known that the intention behind the ta'reez was nafiy or qadhf.
قَالَ مَالِك : الْأَمْرُ عِنْدَنَا، أَنَّهُ إِذَا نَفَى رَجُلٌ رَجُلًا مِنْ أَبِيهِ، فَإِنَّ عَلَيْهِ الْحَدَّ، وَإِنْ كَانَتْ أُمُّ الَّذِي نُفِيَ مَمْلُوكَةً، فَإِنَّ عَلَيْهِ الْحَدَّ
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said: In our view, the ruling is that when someone denies another from his own father, the prescribed punishment (hadd) will be obligatory, even if his mother is a slave woman.
حَدَّثَنِي حَدَّثَنِي مَالِك، عَنْ أَبِي الرِّجَالِ مُحَمَّدِ بْنِ عَبْدِ الرَّحْمَنِ بْنِ حَارِثَةَ بْنِ النُّعْمَانِ الْأَنْصَارِيِّ ثُمَّ مِنْ بَنِي النَّجَّارِ، عَنْ أُمِّهِ عَمْرَةَ بِنْتِ عَبْدِ الرَّحْمَنِ ، أَنَّ رَجُلَيْنِ اسْتَبَّا فِي زَمَانِ عُمَرَ بْنِ الْخَطَّابِ، فَقَالَ أَحَدُهُمَا لِلْآخَرِ : وَاللَّهِ مَا أَبِي بِزَانٍ وَلَا أُمِّي بِزَانِيَةٍ . فَاسْتَشَارَ فِي ذَلِكَ عُمَرُ بْنُ الْخَطَّابِ، فَقَالَ قَائِلٌ : مَدَحَ أَبَاهُ وَأُمَّهُ، وَقَالَ آخَرُونَ : قَدْ كَانَ لِأَبِيهِ وَأُمِّهِ مَدْحٌ غَيْرُ هَذَا، نَرَى أَنْ تَجْلِدَهُ الْحَدَّ، " فَجَلَدَهُ عُمَرُ الْحَدَّ ثَمَانِينَ " .
It is narrated from Hazrat Amrah bint Abdur Rahman that two men exchanged insults during the time of Sayyiduna Umar (may Allah be pleased with him). One said to the other: "By Allah! My father was not an adulterer, nor was my mother an adulteress." Sayyiduna Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) consulted about this matter. One person said: "What is wrong in this? He has mentioned the virtues of his father and mother." And the people said: "Was this the only virtue of his father and mother? In our view, he should be given the hadd punishment for qadhf." Sayyiduna Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) gave him the hadd punishment for qadhf: (80) lashes.
