قَالَ مَالِك : الْأَمْرُ الَّذِي لَا اخْتِلَافَ فِيهِ عِنْدَنَا، أَنَّ قَاتِلَ الْعَمْدِ لَا يَرِثُ مِنْ دِيَةِ مَنْ قَتَلَ شَيْئًا وَلَا مِنْ مَالِهِ، وَلَا يَحْجُبُ أَحَدًا وَقَعَ لَهُ مِيرَاثٌ، وَأَنَّ الَّذِي يَقْتُلُ خَطَأً لَا يَرِثُ مِنَ الدِّيَةِ شَيْئًا، وَقَدِ اخْتُلِفَ فِي أَنْ يَرِثَ مِنْ مَالِهِ لِأَنَّهُ لَا يُتَّهَمُ عَلَى أَنَّهُ قَتَلَهُ لِيَرِثَهُ وَلِيَأْخُذَ مَالَهُ، فَأَحَبُّ إِلَيَّ أَنْ يَرِثَ مِنْ مَالِهِ وَلَا يَرِثُ مِنْ دِيَتِهِ
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said: In our view, there is no difference of opinion in this that the one who commits intentional murder does not inherit the blood money (diyah) of the murdered person, nor his wealth, nor can he deprive any heir. And the one who commits accidental killing does not inherit the blood money, but whether he inherits the rest of the wealth or not, there is a difference of opinion in this. In my view, he will inherit the rest of the wealth.