قَالَ مَالِكٌ : الْأَمْرُ الْمُجْتَمَعُ عَلَيْهِ عِنْدَنَا : أَنَّ الْمُبْتَاعَ إِنِ اشْتَرَطَ مَالَ الْعَبْدِ، فَهُوَ لَهُ، نَقْدًا كَانَ أَوْ دَيْنًا، أَوْ عَرْضًا يُعْلَمُ أَوْ لَا يُعْلَمُ، وَإِنْ كَانَ لِلْعَبْدِ مِنَ الْمَالِ أَكْثَرُ مِمَّا اشْتَرَى بِهِ، كَانَ ثَمَنُهُ نَقْدًا أَوْ دَيْنًا أَوْ عَرْضًا، وَذَلِكَ أَنَّ مَالَ الْعَبْدِ لَيْسَ عَلَى سَيِّدِهِ فِيهِ زَكَاةٌ . وَإِنْ كَانَتْ لِلْعَبْدِ جَارِيَةٌ اسْتَحَلَّ فَرْجَهَا بِمِلْكِهِ إِيَّاهَا، وَإِنْ عَتَقَ الْعَبْدُ، أَوْ كَاتَبَ تَبِعَهُ مَالُهُ، وَإِنْ أَفْلَسَ أَخَذَ الْغُرَمَاءُ مَالَهُ، وَلَمْ يُتَّبَعْ سَيِّدُهُ بِشَيْءٍ مِنْ دَيْنِهِ
Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, said: According to us, there is consensus that if the buyer stipulates a condition for taking that property, then that property will belong to him, whether it is cash, owed by someone, goods, known or unknown, even if that property is more than the price for which the slave was sold, because there is no zakat on the property of the slave for the master; it is considered to belong to the slave himself. And if this slave has a slave-girl, then it is permissible for the master to have intercourse with her. And if this slave becomes free or becomes a mukatab (contracted for freedom), then his property belongs to him. If he becomes insolvent, then it goes to the creditors; there is no liability on his master.