1181 - حَدَّثَنَا الْحُمَيْدِيُّ قَالَ: ثنا سُفْيَانُ، قَالَ: ثنا ابْنُ جُرَيْجٍ، عَنْ أَبِي الزُّبَيْرِ، عَنْ أَبِي صَالِحٍ، عَنْ أَبِي هُرَيْرَةَ، قَالَ: قَالَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صَلَّي اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ: «يُوشِكُ أَنْ يَضْرِبَ النَّاسُ آبَاطَ الْمَطِيِّ فِي طَلَبِ الْعِلْمِ فَلَا يَجِدُونَ عَالِمًا أَعْلَمَ مِنْ عَالِمِ الْمَدِينَةِ»
Sayyiduna Abu Hurairah (may Allah be pleased with him) narrates: The Noble Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) said: "A time will soon come when people will melt the livers of camels in pursuit of knowledge, but they will not find any scholar more knowledgeable than the scholar of Madinah."
Explanation & Benefits
Shaykh Muhammad Ibrahim bin Basheer
Benefit:
From this hadith, it is understood that knowledge will continue until the Day of Judgment, and seekers of knowledge will continue to travel from distant places. This hadith also proves that Madinah Munawwarah was, is, and will remain the fountainhead of knowledge.
Source: Musnad al-Humaydi: Commentary by Muhammad Ibrahim bin Bashir, Page: 1179
Shaykh Dr. Abdur Rahman Freywai
Explanation:
Note:
(In the chain of narration, Ibn Jurayj and Abu’l-Zubayr are mudallis,
and the narration is with ‘an‘anah,
There is a corroborating narration (shahid) for this from the hadith of Abu Musa al-Ash‘ari radi Allahu anhu,
but in that, Zuhr ibn Muhammad is excessively erroneous,
and Sa‘id ibn Abi Hind is a mudallis.)
Source: Sunan al-Tirmidhi – Majlis ‘Ilmi Dar al-Da‘wah, New Delhi Edition, Page: 2680
Hafiz Zubair Ali Zai
Hadith Authentication:
Its chain of narration is weak.
◄ In it, both Ibn Jurayj and Abu’z-Zubayr al-Makki are mudallis, and the narration is through «عن», therefore this chain is weak.
◄ In [الانتقاء لابن عبدالبر ص20], there is also a disconnected (i.e., weak) corroborating narration for it.
Benefit:
When this narration is weak, then there is no need to say, “By this is meant so-and-so or so-and-so.”
◄ It is absolutely correct that Imam Malik was a very great and trustworthy Imam, and ‘Abd al-‘Aziz ibn ‘Abdullah ibn ‘Abdullah ibn ‘Umar al-‘Umari was also trustworthy, but first it is necessary for the hadith to be authentic; only after that can the jurisprudence of the hadith be considered.
Source: Adwa al-Masabih fi Tahqiq Mishkat al-Masabih, Page: 246