(حديث مرفوع) حَدَّثَنَا
خَلَفُ بْنُ الْوَلِيدِ ، قَالَ : حَدَّثَنَا
عَبْدُ اللَّهِ بْنُ الْمُبَارَكِ ، قَالَ : حَدَّثَنِي
مُصْعَبُ بْنُ ثَابِتٍ ، أَنَّ
عَبْدَ اللَّهِ بْنَ الزُّبَيْرِ كَانَتْ بَيْنَهُ وَبَيْنَ أَخِيهِ عَمْرِو بْنِ الزُّبَيْرِ خُصُومَةٌ ، فَدَخَلَ عَبْدُ اللَّهِ بْنُ الزُّبَيْرِ عَلَى سَعِيدِ بْنِ الْعَاصِ ، وَعَمْرُو بْنُ الزُّبَيْرِ مَعَهُ عَلَى السَّرِيرِ ، فَقَالَ سَعِيدٌ لِعَبْدِ اللَّهِ بْنِ الزُّبَيْرِ : هَاهُنَا ، فَقَالَ : لَا ، " قَضَاءُ رَسُولِ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ أَوْ سُنَّةُ رَسُولِ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ أَنَّ الْخَصْمَيْنِ يَقْعُدَانِ بَيْنَ يَدَيْ الْحَكَمِ " .
Mus'ab bin Thabit says that there was some dispute between Sayyiduna Abdullah bin Zubair and his brother Amr bin Zubair. During this time, Sayyiduna Abdullah bin Zubair once went to Sa'id bin al-As. Amr bin Zubair was also sitting with him on the couch. Sa'id called him (Abdullah) closer as well, but he refused and said that the decision and Sunnah of the Prophet (peace be upon him) is that both parties should sit before the ruler.