Toggle above to switch between keyword search and direct hadith lookup

Hadith 2249

This hadith is listed as number 5875 in Maktaba Shamila

وحَدَّثَنِي زُهَيْرُ بْنُ حَرْبٍ ، حَدَّثَنَا جَرِيرٌ ، عَنْ الْأَعْمَشِ ، عَنْ أَبِي صَالِحٍ ، عَنْ أَبِي هُرَيْرَةَ ، قَالَ : قَالَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ : " لَا يَقُولَنَّ أَحَدُكُمْ : عَبْدِي ، فَكُلُّكُمْ عَبِيدُ اللَّهِ ، وَلَكِنْ لِيَقُلْ فَتَايَ ، وَلَا يَقُلِ الْعَبْدُ : رَبِّي ، وَلَكِنْ لِيَقُلْ : سَيِّدِي " .
Abu Hurairah (RA) reported Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) as saying: None of you should say: My bondman, for all of you are the bondmen of Allah, but say: My young man, and the servant should not say: My Lord, but should say: My chief.
Hadith Reference صحيح مسلم / كتاب الألفاظ من الأدب وغيرها / 2249
Hadith Grading محدثین: أحاديث صحيح مسلم كلها صحيحة
Hadith Takhrij «أحاديث صحيح مسلم كلها صحيحة»
Related hadith on this topic
Explanation & Benefits
Maulana Dawood Raz
Hadith Commentary:
The use of the word "Rabb" (Lord) has been prohibited.
Similarly, the use of "abd" (male servant) or "amah" (female servant) has been discouraged so that there is no suspicion of shirk (associating partners with Allah), although saying so is disliked (makruh), not forbidden (haram), as is mentioned in the Qur'an: ﴿اذْكُرْنِي عِندَ رَبِّكَ﴾ (Yusuf 12:42) .
Some have said that it is prohibited to call out in this manner when invoking.
In short, when the figurative meaning is intended, at most this act will be considered disliked (makruh), and this is the reason why the scholars have regarded it as disliked to keep names such as "Abd al-Nabi" (servant of the Prophet) or "Abd al-Husayn" (servant of Husayn), and have described keeping such names as shirk in the sense that they contain the implication or suspicion of shirk.
If the literal meaning is intended, then without doubt it is shirk.
If the figurative meaning is intended, then it will not be shirk, but there is no doubt regarding its being disliked (makruh); therefore, it is better not to keep such names.
Because wherever there is a suspicion of shirk, it is always better to avoid it.
Especially the word "abd" (servant) is such that its attribution is only appropriate towards the word Allah, or al-Rahman, or al-Rahim, and other beautiful names (asma’ al-husna) of Allah.
It is incumbent upon the followers of tawhid (monotheism) and sunnah that they never attribute their servitude (ubudiyyah) to other than Allah.
This is precisely what "iyyaka na’budu" (You alone we worship) demands.
And Allah is the One who grants success.
Source: Sahih Bukhari: Commentary by Maulana Dawood Raz, Page: 2552
Shaykh Abdul Sattar al-Hammad
Hadith Commentary:
(1)
The use of this word is prohibited because true Lordship (rububiyyah) is only befitting to Allah; therefore, this word should not be used for any of the creation. However, in the Noble Qur’an, this word has been used for other than Allah with an addition (idafah), as in: ﴿اذْكُرْنِي عِندَ رَبِّكَ﴾ (Yusuf 12:42) , from which it is understood that the prohibition in the hadith is not one of absolute unlawfulness (tahrimi). And Allah knows best.

(2)
Imam Nawawi rahimahullah has written that if the words “my slave” (abdi) and “my slave-girl” (amati) are used with bad manners and arrogance, then their use is disliked (makruh), and if only praise is intended, then there is no harm in saying these words. (Fath al-Bari: 5/223) In any case, the master should avoid pride and arrogance when calling his male or female slave, and likewise, the slave should also avoid using such words for his master that express reverence similar to that due to Allah.
Source: Hidayat al-Qari: Commentary on Sahih Bukhari, Urdu, Page: 2552