Hadith 1512

This hadith is listed as number 3806 in Maktaba Shamila

وحَدَّثَنِي أَبُو الطَّاهِرِ ، وَحَرْمَلَةُ بْنُ يَحْيَي ، وَاللَّفْظُ لِحَرْمَلَةَ ، قَالَا : أَخْبَرَنَا ابْنُ وَهْبٍ ، أَخْبَرَنِي يُونُسُ ، عَنْ ابْنِ شِهَابٍ ، أَخْبَرَنِي عَامِرُ بْنُ سَعْدِ بْنِ أَبِي وَقَّاصٍ ، أن أبا سعيد الخدري ، قَالَ : " نَهَانَا رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ عَنْ بَيْعَتَيْنِ ، وَلِبْسَتَيْنِ ، نَهَى عَنْ : الْمُلَامَسَةِ ، وَالْمُنَابَذَةِ فِي الْبَيْعِ " ، وَالْمُلَامَسَةُ : لَمْسُ الرَّجُلِ ثَوْبَ الْآخَرِ بِيَدِهِ بِاللَّيْلِ ، أَوْ بِالنَّهَارِ وَلَا يَقْلِبُهُ إِلَّا بِذَلِكَ ، وَالْمُنَابَذَةُ أَنْ يَنْبِذَ الرَّجُلُ إِلَى الرَّجُلِ بِثَوْبِهِ ، وَيَنْبِذَ الْآخَرُ إِلَيْهِ ثَوْبَهُ وَيَكُونُ ذَلِكَ بَيْعَهُمَا مِنْ غَيْرِ نَظَرٍ وَلَا تَرَاضٍ .
Abu Sa'id al-Khudri (RA) reported: Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) forbade us (from), two types of business transactions and two ways of dressing. He forbade Mulamasa and Munabadha in transactions. Mulamasa means the touching of another's garment with his hand, whether at night or by day, without turning it over except this much. Munabadha means that a man throws his garment to another and the other throws his garment, and thus confirming their contract without the inspection of mutual agreement.
Hadith Reference صحيح مسلم / كتاب البيوع / 1512
Hadith Grading محدثین: أحاديث صحيح مسلم كلها صحيحة
Hadith Takhrij «أحاديث صحيح مسلم كلها صحيحة»
Explanation & Benefits
Shaykh Maulana Abdul Aziz Alvi
Hadith Commentary: Benefits and Issues:
From this hadith, it is understood that selling something which is not present in front of one is not permissible.
There are three opinions of the scholars regarding this type of sale:
(1)
The sale of an absent item is not permissible.
This is the opinion of Imam Shafi'i.
(2)
The sale of an absent item is permissible, and after seeing it, the buyer has the option to keep it or leave it.
This is the opinion of the Hanafi scholars, and this view has also been attributed to Imam Malik and Imam Shafi'i.
(3)
When the correct and accurate condition of the absent item—that is, its quality and state—has been described, then the sale is permissible, and if the item does not match the described attribute and state, then the buyer has the option to keep it or leave it.
This is the opinion of Imam Ahmad and Ishaq.
One opinion of Imam Malik and Imam Shafi'i is also this, and this opinion appears to be correct because there is no risk of uncertainty (gharar) or gambling (qimar) in it.
Source: Tuhfat al-Muslim: Commentary on Sahih Muslim, Page: 3806
Shaykh Abdul Sattar al-Hammad
Hadith Commentary:
Bay‘ mulamasah is when a person says to another that when you touch my garment and I touch your garment, the sale will become binding.
In the era of ignorance (Jahiliyyah), this type of sale was commonly practiced.
Since there is deception and ignorance involved in it, the Shari‘ah has prohibited it.
Source: Hidayat al-Qari: Commentary on Sahih Bukhari, Urdu, Page: 2144
Hafiz Muhammad Ameen
Commentary:
In the blessed era of the Messenger of Allah (sallallahu alayhi wa sallam), the people of ignorance (ahl al-jahiliyyah) used to conduct deceptive transactions. The Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa sallam) prohibited all of them. This “mulamasah” and “munabadhah” were also types of such ignorant transactions in which there was clear deception. For example: the seller would say to the buyer that whichever cloth your hand touches, it is sold to you for such-and-such price—regardless of which cloth he touched, even if it was completely torn from the inside. The sale would be finalized merely by touching it. There was no permission to open and inspect it, and later it could not be returned either. This was called “mulamasah.” Similarly, the seller would throw something (a cloth or something else) towards the buyer, and by this act alone, the transaction would be finalized. There was no permission to examine or inspect that item. Later, that item could also not be returned, no matter how defective it was. This was called “munabadhah.” It is obvious that how could the Shari‘ah permit such ambiguous transactions and deception? Therefore, they were strictly prohibited. Another explanation of “munabadhah” has also been given: the buyer would throw a pebble, and whichever item the pebble landed on, its sale would be finalized without any investigation as to what kind of item it was.
Source: Sunan Nasa'i: Translation and Benefits by Shaykh Hafiz Muhammad Amin Hafizullah, Page: 4514
Maulana Ataullah Sajid
Benefits and Issues:


When purchasing something, the buyer has the right to thoroughly inspect and check the item beforehand, so that he may know whether the item is good or bad, and whether it has any defects, and if so, to what extent. Based on this, he can decide whether it is appropriate to purchase it at a certain price.


Any sale in which this right of the buyer is taken away is invalid and unlawful.


Lotteries and such prize schemes in which it is uncertain what one will receive are all un-Islamic.
Source: Commentary on Sunan Ibn Mājah by Mawlānā ‘Atā’ullāh Sājid, Page: 2170