Shaykh Maulana Abdul Aziz Alvi
Hadith Commentary: Benefits and Issues: The Messenger of Allah (sallallahu alayhi wa sallam) apparently conceded and accepted every condition in the treaty for the sake of attaining collective and religious benefits resulting from the reconciliation.
Because writing “Muhammad, son of Abdullah” did not necessitate a denial of your (sallallahu alayhi wa sallam) prophethood, and by writing “Bismik Allahumma” in place of “Bismillah al-Rahman al-Rahim,” the divinity of Allah, which is the real objective, was still affirmed.
Thus, there was no legal or religious harm in accepting their demand, and as for handing over those among them who became Muslim,
apparently, this was to subject them to oppression and cruelty,
but the wisdom behind this was explained by the Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa sallam) himself: that Allah would surely create ease and a way out for them, and this prophecy of the Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa sallam) was fulfilled. As a result of this treaty, a large number of disbelievers embraced Islam,
because they got the opportunity to mix with the Muslims,
became acquainted with Islamic teachings,
became aware of the character and conduct of the Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa sallam) and the Muslims,
had the chance to hear about the circumstances and miracles of the Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa sallam), and as a result, the way for the conquest of Makkah was paved, and on the day of the conquest of Makkah, all the polytheists of Makkah became Muslim.
As for the issue that when you (sallallahu alayhi wa sallam) told Ali (radi Allahu anhu) to erase the words “Messenger of Allah (sallallahu alayhi wa sallam),” he, keeping your honor and reverence in view, said that it was not possible for him to erase those words,
just as when you asked Abu Bakr (radi Allahu anhu),
“When I had ordered you to continue leading the prayer, then why did you step back?” Abu Bakr (radi Allahu anhu) replied,
“It is not possible for the son of Abu Quhafah to lead the prayer in your presence.”
Therefore, you (sallallahu alayhi wa sallam) did not again command Ali (radi Allahu anhu) to erase it,
otherwise, under the principle of “the command is above etiquette,” they could not have refused your obligatory command.
The same situation occurred in the incident of the parchment (waqi‘at al-qirtas),
when Umar (radi Allahu anhu) and other Companions,
considered it contrary to your honor and reverence to trouble you with dictation in your illness, and you did not insist on it again,
otherwise, it would not have been possible for them to oppose your command.
Source: Tuhfat al-Muslim: Commentary on Sahih Muslim, Page: 4632