Hadith 1721

This hadith is listed as number 4497 in Maktaba Shamila

حَدَّثَنَا مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ رَافِعٍ ، حَدَّثَنَا عَبْدُ الرَّزَّاقِ ، حَدَّثَنَا مَعْمَرٌ ، عَنْ هَمَّامِ بْنِ مُنَبِّهٍ ، قَالَ : هَذَا مَا حَدَّثَنَا أَبُو هُرَيْرَةَ ، عَنْ رَسُولِ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ ، فَذَكَرَ أَحَادِيثَ مِنْهَا ، وَقَالَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ : " اشْتَرَى رَجُلٌ مِنْ رَجُلٍ عَقَارًا لَهُ ، فَوَجَدَ الرَّجُلُ الَّذِي اشْتَرَى الْعَقَارَ فِي عَقَارِهِ جَرَّةً فِيهَا ذَهَبٌ ، فَقَالَ لَهُ الَّذِي اشْتَرَى الْعَقَارَ : خُذْ ذَهَبَكَ مِنِّي إِنَّمَا اشْتَرَيْتُ مِنْكَ الْأَرْضَ وَلَمْ أَبْتَعْ مِنْكَ الذَّهَبَ ، فَقَالَ الَّذِي شَرَى الْأَرْضَ : إِنَّمَا بِعْتُكَ الْأَرْضَ وَمَا فِيهَا ، قَالَ : فَتَحَاكَمَا إِلَى رَجُلٍ ، فَقَالَ الَّذِي تَحَاكَمَا إِلَيْهِ : أَلَكُمَا وَلَدٌ ، فَقَالَ أَحَدُهُمَا : لِي غُلَامٌ ، وَقَالَ الْآخَرُ : لِي جَارِيَةٌ ، قَالَ : أَنْكِحُوا الْغُلَامَ الْجَارِيَةَ ، وَأَنْفِقُوا عَلَى أَنْفُسِكُمَا مِنْهُ وَتَصَدَّقَا " .
Hammim bin Munabbih said: Abu Hurairah (RA) reported (so many) ahadith of Allah's Messenger (ﷺ), and one of them is this: A person bought from another person a piece of land, and the person who had bought that land found in it an earthen ware which contained gold. The person who had bought the land said (to the seller of the land): Take your gold from me, for I bought only the land from you and not the gold. The man who had sold the land said: I sold the land to you and whatever was in it. They referred the matter to a person. One who was made as a Judge said to them: Have you any issue? One of them said: I have a boy, and the other said: I have a young daughter. He (the Judge) said: Marry this young boy with the girl, and spend something on yourselves and also give (some) charity out of it.
Hadith Reference صحيح مسلم / كتاب الأقضية / 1721
Hadith Grading محدثین: أحاديث صحيح مسلم كلها صحيحة
Hadith Takhrij «أحاديث صحيح مسلم كلها صحيحة»
Related hadith on this topic
Explanation & Benefits
Shaykh Maulana Abdul Aziz Alvi
Hadith Commentary: Benefits and Issues: Hafiz Ibn Hajar rahimahullah is of the opinion that the person to whom the decision was submitted was Prophet Dawud (alayhis salam), as Wahb ibn Munabbih has stated. The reason for the disagreement is that the buyer thought he had only purchased the land, and in such a case, the buried treasure (in the land) remains the property of the original owner. The seller, on the other hand, thought that since he had sold the land, everything within it was also included, and in this case, the owner would be the buyer. Thus, a mutual disagreement arose. The person whom they accepted as the arbitrator for the decision, upon observing their piety and God-consciousness (wara‘ and taqwa), deemed it appropriate that both should be given the opportunity to benefit from it. Therefore, he advised that it be spent on the marriage of their children, so that both could benefit from it and also give charity from it.

From this, the Imams of Hijaz—Imam Malik, Shafi‘i, and Ahmad—have established the view that if both parties, instead of taking the case to a governmental court, accept another person as an arbitrator, then his decision will be enforceable, and the governmental judge (qadi) will not have the authority to overturn it. However, according to Imam Abu Hanifah, the confirmation (tauthiq) of the qadi is necessary. (Takmila, vol. 2, p. 603)

But Imam Ibn Qudamah has written that if two people accept someone as a proper arbitrator and he is qualified for it, then his decision will be enforceable. This is also the position of Imam Abu Hanifah, and one opinion of Imam Shafi‘i is that if they are satisfied, it will be enforceable, otherwise not. (Al-Mughni, vol. 14, p. 92)
Source: Tuhfat al-Muslim: Commentary on Sahih Muslim, Page: 4497
Maulana Dawood Raz
Hadith Commentary:

Qastallani rahimahullah said that the madhhab of al-Shafi'i is: If someone sells land and then a treasure is found in it, it will belong to the seller, just as if someone sells a house and there are some belongings in it, those will go to the seller. If the buyer stipulates (otherwise), then that is a different matter.
Source: Sahih Bukhari: Commentary by Maulana Dawood Raz, Page: 3472
Shaykh Abdul Sattar al-Hammad
Hadith Commentary:

From this hadith, it is understood that those people were very cautious and pious. However, in our turbulent times, the situation is the opposite. People commit dishonesty even in trivial matters and take pride in usurping others’ wealth.


In our Shariah, the details regarding such wealth are as follows: if, based on indications, it is known that it is a buried treasure from the pre-Islamic era (Jahiliyyah), then it is rikaz, and one-fifth of it must be given to the public treasury (bayt al-mal). If the wealth is from the Islamic era, then it falls under the ruling of lost property (luqatah), and if it cannot be determined, then all of the wealth should be deposited in the bayt al-mal, to be spent on the collective needs of the Muslims.


Some scholars hold the view that whoever becomes the owner of land also becomes the owner of everything beneath it, and if, at the time of acquiring the land, he was unaware of anything within it, this does not nullify his ownership. Some scholars say that if someone sells land and then a treasure is found in it, it will belong to the seller, just as in the case of selling a house, the goods and belongings remain the property of the seller—unless the buyer stipulates otherwise.
And Allah knows best.
Source: Hidayat al-Qari: Commentary on Sahih Bukhari, Urdu, Page: 3472
Maulana Ataullah Sajid
Benefits and Issues:


The incidents of previous communities can be narrated as lessons and admonitions, provided that they are established from the Noble Qur’an or authentic ahadith. It is not permissible to embellish sermons and speeches with weak, fabricated, or spurious narrations.


From the legal matters of past communities, only those rulings may be acted upon which are not contrary to our Shari’ah.


Honesty and goodwill towards one another in buying and selling are causes of blessing.


In matters of dispute, it is very commendable to adopt such a course that both parties are pleased with.


A buried treasure is the lawful property of the person who finds it, provided it cannot be ascertained who buried it.


A buried treasure should not be spent entirely on oneself. In our Shari’ah, the limit for this is set at one-fifth, i.e., twenty percent is to be paid as zakah, and the remainder may be used for personal benefit.
Source: Commentary on Sunan Ibn Mājah by Mawlānā ‘Atā’ullāh Sājid, Page: 2511