Toggle above to switch between keyword search and direct hadith lookup
معجم صغير للطبراني
Mu'jam al-Saghir
كتاب الأذانBook of the Call to Prayer
The chapter on ablution not being nullified by eating food cooked over fire
Hadith 158
اُردوEn
وَبِإِسْنَادِهِ وَبِإِسْنَادِهِ عَنْ جَابِرٍ ، قَالَ : " كَانَ آخِرُ الأَمْرَيْنِ مِنْ رَسُولِ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَآلِهِ وَسَلَّمَ ، تَرْكَ الْوُضُوءِ مِمَّا مَسَّتِ النَّارُ "، لَمْ يَرْوِ هَذَيْنِ الْحَدِيثَيْنِ عَنْ مُحَمَّدِ بْنِ الْمُنْكَدِرِ ، إِلا شُعَيْبٌ
Sayyiduna Jabir (may Allah be pleased with him) says: The latter of the two matters is not performing ablution after eating something cooked with fire.
Related hadith on this topic
Explanation & Benefits
Shaykh Dr. Abdur Rahman Freywai
1:
Except for camel meat,
as is coming in the next hadith,
camel meat has a particular kind of odor and greasiness,
because of which it has been declared as something that breaks ablution (wudu),
to interpret the ablution (wudu) mentioned in this context as merely washing the hands and face is to unnecessarily divert the legal terms from their actual meaning.
Except for camel meat,
as is coming in the next hadith,
camel meat has a particular kind of odor and greasiness,
because of which it has been declared as something that breaks ablution (wudu),
to interpret the ablution (wudu) mentioned in this context as merely washing the hands and face is to unnecessarily divert the legal terms from their actual meaning.
Source: Sunan al-Tirmidhi – Majlis ‘Ilmi Dar al-Da‘wah, New Delhi Edition, Page: 80
Hafiz Muhammad Ameen
185. Commentary: By "two actions" is meant performing ablution (wudu) after eating something cooked over fire, and not performing it. In other words, the command to perform ablution in this context has been abrogated. The narration of Ibn Abbas radi Allahu anhuma also points towards this, because Ibn Abbas radi Allahu anhuma came to Madinah after the conquest of Makkah.
Source: Sunan Nasa'i: Translation and Benefits by Shaykh Hafiz Muhammad Amin Hafizullah, Page: 185
Shaykh Umar Farooq Saeedi
Benefits and Issues:
➊
Allamah Khattabi writes:
If the host has not given a prior invitation, then suddenly joining his meal is considered disliked,
unless it is clear from signs and indications that the owner of the food is offering generously.
In that case, one may join.
➋
Both of the aforementioned narrations (the one about washing the hands and the one about not washing them) are unreliable due to their weakness,
therefore, washing the hands at the time of eating is not obligatory.
However, if the hands are not clean, then washing them becomes necessary.
➊
Allamah Khattabi writes:
If the host has not given a prior invitation, then suddenly joining his meal is considered disliked,
unless it is clear from signs and indications that the owner of the food is offering generously.
In that case, one may join.
➋
Both of the aforementioned narrations (the one about washing the hands and the one about not washing them) are unreliable due to their weakness,
therefore, washing the hands at the time of eating is not obligatory.
However, if the hands are not clean, then washing them becomes necessary.
Source: Sunan Abu Dawood – Commentary by Shaykh Umar Farooq Saeedi, Page: 3762
Shaykh Muhammad Ibrahim bin Basheer
Benefit:
From this hadith, it is understood that ablution (wudu) is not nullified by something cooked over fire. One should invite one another, and in an invitation, as many dishes as desired—such as bread, milk, etc.—can be prepared.
From this hadith, it is understood that ablution (wudu) is not nullified by something cooked over fire. One should invite one another, and in an invitation, as many dishes as desired—such as bread, milk, etc.—can be prepared.
Source: Musnad al-Humaydi: Commentary by Muhammad Ibrahim bin Bashir, Page: 1301
