Toggle above to switch between keyword search and direct hadith lookup

Hadith 129

حَدَّثَنَا الْقَاسِمُ بْنُ عَفَافِ بْنِ سُلَيْمٍ الْفَوْزِيُّ الْحِمْصِيُّ ، حَدَّثَنِي عَمِّي أَحْمَدُ بْنُ مُسْلِمٍ ، حَدَّثَنَا عِيسَى بْنُ يُونُسَ ، عَنْ زَكَرِيَّا بْنِ أَبِي زَائِدَةَ ، عَنِ الشَّعْبِيِّ ، عَنْ شَقِيقِ بْنِ سَلَمَةَ ، عَنْ حُذَيْفَةَ ، قَالَ : " كُنْتُ أَمْشِي مَعَ النَّبِيِّ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَآلِهِ وَسَلَّمَ ، فَانْتَهَى إِلَى سُبَاطَةِ قَوْمٍ ، فَبَالَ قَائِمًا ، فَدَعَانِي ، فَقَالَ : لِمَ تَنَحَّيْتَ عَنِّي ، فَجِئْتُ حَتَّى كُنْتُ عِنْدَ عَقِبِهِ ، ثُمَّ أُتِيَ بِمَاءٍ ، فَتَوَضَّأَ ، وَمَسَحَ عَلَى الْخُفَّيْنِ "، لَمْ يَرْوِهِ عَنِ الشَّعْبِيِّ ، إِلا زَكَرِيَّا ، وَلا عَنْهُ إِلا عِيسَى ، تَفَرَّدَ بِهِ أَحْمَدُ بْنُ سُلَيْمٍ
Sayyiduna Hudhayfah (may Allah be pleased with him) says: I was walking with the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) when he went to a heap of filth belonging to some people, stood and urinated, and called me. He said: "Why did you go far from me?" I came and stood behind the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him). Then water was brought to the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him), so he performed ablution and wiped over his leather socks.
Hadith Reference معجم صغير للطبراني / كتاب الطهارة / 129
Hadith Grading محدثین: صحیح
Hadith Takhrij «أخرجه البخاري فى «صحيحه» برقم: 224، 225، 226، 2471، ومسلم فى «صحيحه» برقم: 273، وابن خزيمة فى «صحيحه» برقم: 52، 61، 63، وابن حبان فى «صحيحه» برقم: 1424، 1425، 1427، 1428، 1429، والنسائي فى «المجتبیٰ» برقم: 18، 26، 27، 28 ، والنسائي فى «الكبریٰ» برقم: 18، 23، 24، وأبو داود فى «سننه» برقم: 23، والترمذي فى «جامعه» برقم: 13، 13 م 1، 13 م 2، والدارمي فى «مسنده» برقم: 695، وابن ماجه فى «سننه» برقم: 305، 306، 544، والبيهقي فى«سننه الكبير» برقم: 491، 492، 493، 1298، وأحمد فى «مسنده» برقم: 18437، 23713، والحميدي فى «مسنده» برقم: 447، والطبراني فى «الأوسط» برقم: 1120، 4961، والطبراني فى «الصغير» برقم: 752، 1130»
Explanation & Benefits
Shaykh Dr. Abdur Rahman Freywai
1:
That is, both Hammad and ‘Asim have also narrated from Abu Wa’il, but Abu Wa’il has narrated from “Mughira ibn Shu’bah” radi Allahu anhu as well as from Hudhayfah.
This often happens that a narrator has narrated a hadith from two different narrators, so it is possible that Abu Wa’il heard it from both Companions.

2:
Because the narration of A‘mash is also found in the two Sahihs (Sahih al-Bukhari and Sahih Muslim), whereas the narration of ‘Asim is only in Ibn Majah, although that too is authentic.
(The matter is only about being “more authentic.”)
Source: Sunan al-Tirmidhi – Majlis ‘Ilmi Dar al-Da‘wah, New Delhi Edition, Page: 13
Shaykh Umar Farooq Saeedi
Benefits and Issues:
➊ It is understood that in cases of necessity, urinating while standing is permissible, provided there is no fear of splashing. Accordingly, in light of this hadith, it is narrated from Umar, Ali, Ibn Umar, and Zayd bin Thabit (radi Allahu anhum) that urinating while standing is permissible. However, the Sunnah is that a person should urinate while sitting, because it is narrated from Sayyidah Aishah (radi Allahu anha): "Whoever tells you that the Noble Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa sallam) used to urinate while standing, do not confirm his statement, for the Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa sallam) always used to urinate while sitting." [جامع الترمذي، الطهارة، باب ما جاء فى النهي عن البول قائما، حديث : 12، وسنن النسائي، الطهارة، حديث : 29] Imam Tirmidhi (rahimahullah) states that, regarding this issue, this narration is the most authentic. Furthermore, urinating while sitting provides greater concealment and a person is more protected from urine splashes. Nowadays, modern types of people, who have gone to extremes in imitating the West, urinate while standing in hotels and parks and feel pride in it, whereas imitating others in every matter is completely contrary to the hadith of the Messenger (sallallahu alayhi wa sallam). May Allah grant us the ability to act upon the Sunnah of the Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa sallam) and protect us from imitating the English and non-Muslims.

➋ It is also understood that in certain situations, it is permissible to urinate near people.
Source: Sunan Abu Dawood – Commentary by Shaykh Umar Farooq Saeedi, Page: 23
Shaykh Maulana Abdul Aziz Alvi
Hadith Commentary:
Vocabulary of the Hadith:

‘Ala raghmi anf:
Raghima, righam:
(soil,
dust)
is derived from this,
whose literal meaning is “may his nose be soiled with dust,”
meaning he is afflicted with humiliation and disgrace.
However, this is an Arabic idiom, and it is not intended as a curse;
the only purpose is to express that, contrary to his desire, this matter will certainly occur.

Benefits and Issues:
(1)
La ilaha illallah
is an allusion to tawhid (monotheism), and tawhid, as we have already explained, is the title of the entire religion.
That is, to have faith in the religion of Islam and to adhere to it.
It is evident that whoever adheres to the complete religion,
and does not oppose any of its commands, will go straight to Paradise.
If, despite professing tawhid, he has also committed sins, then if he is deserving of pardon due to his other righteous deeds, Allah, exalted is He, will forgive his sins and admit him to Paradise without any punishment.
And if he is not deserving of pardon, then after receiving punishment for his sins, he will be able to enter Paradise, and we have already explained the reason for this above.
(1/40/150/92) (2)
Abu Dharr (radi Allahu anhu) repeated his question several times,
because he considered adultery and theft to be extremely vile sins.
For this reason, he was astonished that those who commit such indecent and filthy sins could also enter Paradise.

(3)
This hadith proves that one who commits major sins (kabirah) will not remain in the Fire forever, as is the belief of the Khawarij and the Mu'tazilah.
However, to infer from this that merely professing la ilaha illallah is sufficient for entry into Paradise,
and that there is no need for righteous deeds, nor is there any harm in evil deeds, as is the belief of the Murji’ah, is not correct.
For the explanation and clarification of the meanings of the texts of the Qur’an and Sunnah, it is necessary that all the texts on this subject be taken into consideration;
otherwise, contradiction will arise among the texts, and their correct meaning will not be understood.
Therefore, we see that the Khawarij and Mu'tazilah, by taking one type of text (those related to warning and intimidation),
declared the perpetrator of major sins to be eternally in Hellfire,
and the Murji’ah, by taking another type of text (those related to encouragement, motivation, and glad tidings),
considered sins to be insignificant and said that merely saying la ilaha illallah is sufficient for entry into Paradise. In this way, both groups deviated from the path of truth and correctness.
Ahl al-Sunnah combined both types of texts,
which eliminated the contradiction and led to the path of truth and correctness.
Source: Tuhfat al-Muslim: Commentary on Sahih Muslim, Page: 273
Hafiz Muhammad Ameen
18. Commentary:

➊ This narration is brief, which may lead to some misunderstandings; therefore, clarification has been attempted in the translation through parentheses. The correct account of the incident is that when the Messenger of Allah (sallallahu alayhi wa sallam) expressed the intention to urinate on a garbage heap, Hudhayfah (radi Allahu anhu), as usual, began to move away from him. However, since the Prophet only needed to urinate, in which there was no likelihood of sound or odor (especially in a standing position), he said to him: "O Hudhayfah! Provide me with a screen." So he stood close behind the Prophet, facing the other direction. (The phrase "near the heels" refers to general proximity, not literally standing heel to heel.) In this way, there was no possibility of looking towards the Prophet, and complete privacy was ensured.

➋ The general habit of the Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa sallam) was to urinate while sitting, but in the mentioned incident, he urinated while standing. Various rational and textual explanations have been given for this, for example: to avoid the filth of the heap, because if he sat on the heap, his clothes or body could become soiled; or so that the stream of urine would fall farther away. In a sitting position, the urine would fall nearby and return towards the feet, and splashes could also occur; or due to difficulty in sitting because of pain in the knee, as is mentioned in a weak narration of al-Bayhaqi. [السنن الکبریٰ، للبیھقی : 101/1] Or for the treatment of back pain, as some physicians believed. In any case, in light of these explanations, the general opinion is that there must have been one of these reasons for the Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa sallam) to urinate standing in this instance. However, the research is that none of these mentioned reasons are authentically established regarding the Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa sallam), so in contrast, there is another opinion which Imam Nawawi (rahimahullah) and others have adopted, and that is that the Prophet urinated standing only to demonstrate permissibility, while his general habit was to urinate sitting. See: [صحیح مسلم، اطھارۃ، حدیث : 274، مع شرح النووي] Hafiz Ibn Hajar (rahimahullah) says regarding this, «وإلا ظھر أنه فعل ذلک لبیان الجواز……» "The clearer statement is that this action of the Prophet was only to demonstrate permissibility..." [فتح الباري : 430/1، طبع دارالسلام] Furthermore, Hafiz Ibn Hajar (rahimahullah) did not consider the transmitted explanations in this regard as authoritative. In any case, if a person, due to necessity or even occasionally without necessity, keeping in view the permissibility, urinates standing in order to act upon the Sunnah, then insha Allah it will be permissible. And Allah knows best.

➌ The purpose of the chapter is that if there is no fear of sound or odor, then only a screen is sufficient for urination; there is no need to go far away.
Source: Sunan Nasa'i: Translation and Benefits by Shaykh Hafiz Muhammad Amin Hafizullah, Page: 18