Hadith 952

حَدَّثَنَا مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ بَشَّارٍ ، حَدَّثَنَا مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ جَعْفَرٍ ، حَدَّثَنَا شُعْبَةُ ، عَنْ حُمَيْدِ بْنِ هِلَالٍ ، عَنْ عَبْدِ اللَّهِ بْنِ الصَّامِتِ ، عَنْ أَبِي ذَرٍّ ، عَنِ النَّبِيِّ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ قَالَ : " يَقْطَعُ الصَّلَاةَ إِذَا لَمْ يَكُنْ بَيْنَ يَدَيِ الرَّجُلِ مِثْلُ مُؤَخِّرَةِ الرَّحْلِ : الْمَرْأَةُ ، وَالْحِمَارُ ، وَالْكَلْبُ الْأَسْوَدُ " ، قَالَ : قُلْتُ : مَا بَالُ الْأَسْوَدِ مِنَ الْأَحْمَرِ ؟ فقَالَ : سَأَلْتُ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ كَمَا سَأَلْتَنِي فَقَالَ : " الْكَلْبُ الْأَسْوَدُ شَيْطَانٌ " .
´It was narrated from ‘Abdullah bin Samit from Abu Dharr, that the Prophet (ﷺ) said:` “The prayer is severed by a woman, a donkey, and a black dog, if there is not something like the handle of a saddle in front of a man.” I (‘Abdullah) said: “What is wrong with a black dog and not a red one?” He (Abu Dharr) said: ‘I asked the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) the same question, and he said: “The black dog is a Shaitan (satan).”
Hadith Reference سنن ابن ماجه / كتاب إقامة الصلاة والسنة / 952
Hadith Grading الألبانی: صحيح  |  زبیر علی زئی: صحيح مسلم
Hadith Takhrij « صحیح مسلم/الصلاة 50 ( 510 ) ، سنن ابی داود/الصلاة 110 ( 702 ) ، سنن الترمذی/الصلاة 137 ( 338 ) ، سنن النسائی/القبلة 7 ( 751 ) ، ( تحفة الأشراف : 11939 ) ، وقد أخرجہ : مسند احمد ( 5/49 1 ، 151 ، 155 ، 160 ، 161 ) ، سنن الدارمی/الصلاة 128 ( 1454 ) ( صحیح ) »
Explanation & Benefits
Maulana Ataullah Sajid
Benefits and Issues:

The meaning of the hadith is that Satan brings the black dog in front of the person praying, or Satan himself comes in the form of a dog, so that the attention of the one praying is drawn towards it. In any case, some animals have an affinity with Satan, and there is a greater element of mischief in them.


The passing of these (things) actually breaks the prayer. There is a difference of opinion regarding this. One group of scholars holds that the prayer is indeed broken, as is apparent from the literal wording of the hadith. Other scholars say that what is meant by breaking the prayer is a reduction in humility and submissiveness (khushu‘ and khudu‘). A third opinion is that this hadith is abrogated, and its abrogator is this hadith: (لَايَقْطَعُ الصَّلاَةَ شَيْئٌُ)
(Sunan Abi Dawud, Kitab al-Salat, Chapter: Whoever said nothing breaks..., Hadith: 719)
“Nothing breaks the prayer.” However, the first position is more correct, because it is supported by another authentic hadith in which it is stated:
(تعاد الصلاة من ممر الحمار والمرأة والكلب الأسود)
(Al-Silsilah al-Sahihah: 959/7, Hadith: 3323)
“The prayer is to be repeated if a donkey, a woman, or a black dog passes in front (of the one praying).” And those who have used (لَايَقْطَعُ الصَّلاَةَ شَيْئٌُ) as evidence, according to them, these three things will be excluded from that generality, those things whose passing breaks the prayer, and they are: a woman, a donkey, and a black dog. From the generality of this hadith, these three things will be exempted, meaning that if they pass in front, the prayer will be broken and its repetition will be necessary. However, apart from these, the passing of anything else does not break the prayer. And Allah knows best.
Source: Commentary on Sunan Ibn Mājah by Mawlānā ‘Atā’ullāh Sājid, Page: 952