قَالَ أَبُو عَبْد اللَّهِ بْن مَاجَةْ : الصَّحِيحُ هُوَ الْأَوَّلُ ، وَالثَّانِي ، وَهْمٌ ، قَالَ أَبُو الْحَسَنِ بْنُ سَلَمَةَ : حَدَّثَنَا أَبُو حَاتِمٍ ، وَأَبُو عُثْمَانَ الْبُخَارِيُّ ، قَالَا : حَدَّثَنَا الْمُعَلَّى بْنُ أَسَدٍ ، نَحْوَهُ .
A hadith with the same meaning has also been narrated through this chain.
Related hadith on this topic
Explanation & Benefits
Maulana Ataullah Sajid
Commentary:
(1)
Imam Ibn Majah rahimahullah said:
The first narration is authentic, and the second is an error.
This could mean that the first narration is authentic and in the second, the narrator made a mistake.
And it could also mean what was mentioned in the previous chapter: that husband and wife may perform ritual bath (ghusl) from the water left over by each other—that is correct.
And the issue in the second chapter, that is, its prohibition, is not the preferred view.
(2)
Some scholars have written regarding this prohibition that it is either from before the concession was granted, or it is based on precaution.
And the more correct view is what was mentioned in the previous chapter: that a woman and a man may perform ablution (wudu) from the water used and left over by each other.
Source: Commentary on Sunan Ibn Mājah by Mawlānā ‘Atā’ullāh Sājid, Page: 374