Hadith 3192

حَدَّثَنَا سُوَيْدُ بْنُ سَعِيدٍ ، حَدَّثَنَا عَلِيُّ بْنُ مُسْهِرٍ ، عَنْ أَبِي إِسْحَاق الشَّيْبَانِيِّ ، قَالَ : سَأَلْتُ عَبْدَ اللَّهِ بْنَ أَبِي أَوْفَى عَنْ لُحُومِ الْحُمُرِ الْأَهْلِيَّةِ ، فَقَالَ : " أَصَابَتْنَا مَجَاعَةٌ يَوْمَ خَيْبَرَ ، وَنَحْنُ مَعَ النَّبِيِّ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ وَقَدْ أَصَابَ الْقَوْمُ حُمُرًا خَارِجًا مِنْ الْمَدِينَةِ فَنَحَرْنَاهَا ، وَإِنَّ قُدُورَنَا لَتَغْلِي ، إِذْ نَادَى مُنَادِي النَّبِيِّ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ : أَنِ اكْفَئُوا الْقُدُورَ ، وَلَا تَطْعَمُوا مِنْ لُحُومِ الْحُمُرِ شَيْئًا ، فَأَكْفَأْنَاهَا ، فَقُلْتُ لِعَبْدِ اللَّهِ بْنِ أَبِي أَوْفَى : حَرَّمَهَا تَحْرِيمًا ، قَالَ : تَحَدَّثْنَا أَنَّمَا حَرَّمَهَا رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ الْبَتَّةَ مِنْ أَجْلِ ، أَنَّهَا تَأْكُلُ الْعَذِرَةَ " .
´It was narrated that Abu Ishaq Shaibani said:` “I asked ‘Abdullah bin Abu Awfa about the flesh of domesticated donkeys and he said: ‘We were starving on the Day of Khaibar, when we were with the Prophet (ﷺ). The people had gotten some donkeys as spoils of war on the way out from Al-Madinah, so we slaughtered them and our cooking pots were boiling when the caller of the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) cried out, telling us to overturn out pots and not to eat anything of the flesh of donkeys. So we overturned them.’ I said to ‘Abdullah bin Abu Awfa: ‘Was it made unlawful?’ He said: ‘We think that the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) forbade it altogether because it eats excrement.’”
Hadith Reference سنن ابن ماجه / كتاب الذبائح / 3192
Hadith Grading الألبانی: صحيح  |  زبیر علی زئی: متفق عليه
Hadith Takhrij «صحیح البخاری/المغازي 38 ( 4220 ) ، الصید 28 ( 1937 ) ، صحیح مسلم/الصید 5 ( 437 ) ، سنن النسائی/الصید 31 ( 4344 ) ، ( تحفة الأشراف : 5164 ) ، وقد أخرجہ : مسند احمد ( 4/355 ، 356 ، 357 ، 381 ) ( صحیح ) »
Explanation & Benefits
Maulana Ataullah Sajid
Benefits and Issues:

➊ The meat of donkeys is forbidden (haram).

➋ One of the reasons for its prohibition at Khaybar could also be the one mentioned in this hadith; however, the next hadith indicates that this prohibition is not temporary, but absolute.

➌ If forbidden (haram) meat is cooked by mistake, then upon realizing it, it should be discarded.
And Allah knows best.
Source: Commentary on Sunan Ibn Mājah by Mawlānā ‘Atā’ullāh Sājid, Page: 3192
Shaykh Abdul Sattar al-Hammad
Hadith Commentary:

This hadith proves that the mujahideen are permitted to consume, as needed, from the spoils of war (mal-e-ghanīmah), but they are prohibited from eating the meat of donkeys due to its prohibition, not because prior permission for consumption had not been obtained.


The narrator asked Sa‘id ibn Jubayr rahimahullah because he was a close student of Ibn ‘Abbas radi Allahu anhu, and from Ibn ‘Abbas radi Allahu anhu, the permissibility of donkey meat has been narrated. However, Sa‘id ibn Jubayr rahimahullah had thoroughly investigated the prohibition of it from other Companions radi Allahu anhum ajma‘in, and thus he issued a fatwa of its prohibition with certainty. Now, there is no difference of opinion regarding its prohibition; rather, all the scholars are unanimous upon its impermissibility.


Those items which are related to food, or those things which customarily provide the benefit of food, as well as animals’ grass and fodder, etc.—all such items may be taken without the permission of the leader (imam) before distribution, provided the intention is not hoarding or turning it into property of value.

And Allah knows best.
Source: Hidayat al-Qari: Commentary on Sahih Bukhari, Urdu, Page: 3155
Shaykh Maulana Abdul Aziz Alvi
Hadith Commentary: Benefits and Issues: The Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa sallam) absolutely and permanently forbade the consumption of the meat of domestic donkeys. However, what was the background to this prohibition? Regarding this, the opinions of the noble Companions (radi Allahu anhum) differ and are based on their respective ijtihad (independent reasoning).
Source: Tuhfat al-Muslim: Commentary on Sahih Muslim, Page: 5010
Hafiz Muhammad Ameen
(1) Domesticated donkeys are forbidden. It is also understood that if the meat of any animal or bird is forbidden to eat, then even if that animal or bird is slaughtered while pronouncing Allah’s name over it, it still remains forbidden. This is because the noble Companions (radi Allahu anhum) had already begun to cook the meat of donkeys, and those donkeys had been slaughtered in the name of Allah.

(2) If any impure (najis) thing comes into contact with a pure thing, its impurity is removed by washing it just once. However, if the Shariah requires washing more than once, then it is necessary to fulfill the demand of the purified Shariah.

(3) The original ruling regarding things is permissibility (i.e., they are lawful and allowed). This is why the noble Companions (radi Allahu anhum) began to slaughter donkeys and cook their meat without hesitation, even though the Messenger of Allah (sallallahu alayhi wa sallam) was present among them. Yet, they neither discussed this matter with him nor sought his advice, because it was firmly established in their minds that things are, by default, lawful, except when there is evidence for prohibition.

(4) It is the responsibility of the leader, the one in charge, and the person responsible to be aware of the conditions of those under his authority and those appointed by him, and to resolve their issues and difficulties. Furthermore, if he observes any un-Islamic matter among them, he should rectify it himself or have it rectified through one of his representatives, so that people do not begin to consider silence over an un-Islamic matter as approval, and thus an unlawful act is not deemed lawful merely due to negligence.

(5) “We overturned (the pots),” meaning we threw the meat outside and wasted it. This refutes those who think that donkeys are not inherently forbidden, but rather, since people slaughtered the donkeys without your (the Prophet’s) permission and distribution, and the required fifth (khums) was not given from them, you ordered the pots to be overturned as a punishment. However, if that were the case, the meat would not have been wasted; rather, it would have been confiscated for the state. It is forbidden to waste something lawful.
Source: Sunan Nasa'i: Translation and Benefits by Shaykh Hafiz Muhammad Amin Hafizullah, Page: 4344