Hadith 306M

قَالَ شُعْبَةُ : قَالَ عَاصِمٌ يَوْمَئِذٍ : وَهَذَا الْأَعْمَشُ يَرْوِيهِ ، عَنْ أَبِي وَائِلٍ ، عَنْ حُذَيْفَةَ وَمَا حَفِظَهُ ، فَسَأَلْتُ عَنْهُ مَنْصُورًا ؟ فَحَدَّثَنِيهِ ، عَنْ أَبِي وَائِلٍ ، عَنْ حُذَيْفَةَ : " أَنَّ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ أَتَى سُبَاطَةَ قَوْمٍ فَبَالَ قَائِمًا " .
'Shu’bah said that' ‘Asim has added the word «يومئذ» in his narration, and has said: The Prophet (peace be upon him) came to a garbage dump of a people, and standing there, he urinated that day. And A’mash narrates this hadith through the way of «عن أبي وائل عن حذيفة», he does not mention «يومئذ», so I asked Mansur about this, and he narrated to me through the way of «عن أبي وائل عن حذيفة» that the Messenger of Allah (peace be upon him) came to a garbage dump of a people, and he urinated standing up. 1؎.
Hadith Reference سنن ابن ماجه / كتاب الطهارة وسننها / 306M
Hadith Takhrij «انظر حدیث رقم : 305 ( تحفة الأشراف : 11502 ، ومصباح الزجاجة : 123 ) »
Related hadith on this topic
Explanation & Benefits
Maulana Ataullah Sajid
Commentary:
The difference in the chain of narration has been clarified by Imam Ibn Majah rahimahullah himself, which makes it clear that this difference does not affect the authenticity of the hadith.
Since both Hudhayfah radi Allahu anhu and Mughirah radi Allahu anhu are Companions, whichever of the two narrated from the Messenger of Allah sallallahu alayhi wa sallam, the hadith will be authentic, not weak.
Therefore, in terms of its chain, the hadith is authentic.
Source: Commentary on Sunan Ibn Mājah by Mawlānā ‘Atā’ullāh Sājid, Page: 306