Hadith 2830

حَدَّثَنَا أَبُو بَكْرِ بْنُ أَبِي شَيْبَةَ ، وَعَلِيُّ بْنُ مُحَمَّدٍ ، قَالَا : حَدَّثَنَا وَكِيعٌ ، عَنْ سُفْيَانَ ، عَنْ سِمَاكِ بْنِ حَرْبٍ ، عَنْ قَبِيصَةَ بْنِ هُلْبٍ ، عَنْ أَبِيهِ ، قَالَ : سَأَلْتُ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ عَنْ طَعَامِ النَّصَارَى ، فَقَالَ : " لَا يَخْتَلِجَنَّ فِي صَدْرِكَ طَعَامٌ ، ضَارَعْتَ فِيهِ نَصْرَانِيَّةً " .
´It was narrated from Qabisah bin Hulb that his father said:` “I asked the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) about the food of the Christians and he said: ‘Do not have any doubt about food, (thereby) following the way of the Christians in that.’”
Hadith Reference سنن ابن ماجه / كتاب الجهاد / 2830
Hadith Grading الألبانی: حسن  |  زبیر علی زئی: حسن
Hadith Takhrij «سنن ابی داود/الأطعمة 24 ( 3784 ) ، سنن الترمذی/السیر 16 ( 1565 ) ، ( تحفة الأشراف : 11734 ) ، وقد مسند احمد ( 5/226 ) ( حسن ) » ( سند میں قبیصہ بن ہلب مجہول العین ہیں ، ان سے صرف سماک نے روایت کی ہے ، لیکن حدیث کے شواہد کی بناء پر یہ حسن ہے ، ملاحظہ ہو : جلباب المرأة المسلة : 182 )
Related hadith on this topic
Explanation & Benefits
Maulana Ataullah Sajid
Benefits and Issues:
➊ Among Jews and Christians, the legal ruling is that the animal should be slaughtered while taking the name of Allah, but nowadays Christians do not act upon this. If any Jew or Christian slaughters an animal while taking the name of Allah, then that slaughtered animal is lawful (halal).

➋ Any food in which neither meat nor anything derived from meat (such as fat or gelatin, etc.) has been used, if it is prepared by a non-Muslim, it is still permissible. Similarly, if the meat of an animal slaughtered by a Muslim is cooked by a non-Muslim, then it is permissible for a Muslim to eat it.
Source: Commentary on Sunan Ibn Mājah by Mawlānā ‘Atā’ullāh Sājid, Page: 2830
Shaykh Umar Farooq Saeedi
Benefits and Issues:
Benefit: It is not permissible in the Shari‘ah to entertain baseless doubts and suspicions regarding things that are lawful (halal) and pure.
This was the practice of Christian monks,
who, by falling into unnecessary doubts and suspicions, would declare things unlawful (haram) for themselves.
If one feels any doubt regarding something, one should refer to trustworthy scholars in order to reach the correct conclusion,
as to whether that thing is halal or haram.
However, if something is naturally unappealing, then there is no harm in avoiding it.
Source: Sunan Abu Dawood – Commentary by Shaykh Umar Farooq Saeedi, Page: 3784