سنن ابن ماجه
Ibn Majah
كتاب الدياتThe Chapters on Blood Money
بَابُ : دِيَةِ شِبْهِ الْعَمْدِ مُغَلَّظَةًChapter: The Blood Money For What Appears To Be Intentional Due To Its Harshness.
Hadith 2629
اُردوEn
حَدَّثَنَا مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ بَشَّارٍ ، حَدَّثَنَا مُعَاذُ بْنُ هَانِئٍ ، حَدَّثَنَا مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ مُسْلِمٍ ، عَنْ عَمْرِو بْنِ دِينَارٍ ، عَنْ عِكْرِمَةَ ، عَنِ ابْنِ عَبَّاسٍ ، عَنِ النَّبِيِّ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ : " أَنَّهُ جَعَلَ الدِّيَةَ اثْنَيْ عَشَرَ أَلْفًا " .
´It was narrated from Ibn 'Abbas that :` the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) set the blood money at twelve thousand (Dirham).
Related hadith on this topic
Explanation & Benefits
Hafiz Muhammad Ameen
While the wording of the hadith narrated by Muhammad bin al-Muthanna is synonymous with it.
Source: Sunan Nasa'i: Translation and Benefits by Shaykh Hafiz Muhammad Amin Hafizullah, Page: 4807
Hafiz Muhammad Ameen
(1) The authenticity of both of the aforementioned narrations as being marfu‘ (attributed directly to the Prophet sallallahu alayhi wa sallam) is questionable. The preferred opinion is that this narration is mursal. However, regarding the twelve thousand dirhams, it is authentically reported that Umar radi Allahu anhu, after calculating the value of the camels, fixed the amount at twelve thousand dirhams. (Sunan Abi Dawud, Hadith: 4542) For further details, see: (al-Irwa’: 7/304, Dhakheerat al-‘Uqba Sharh Sunan al-Nasa’i: 36, 186)
(2) The original blood money (diyah) is camels, the details of which have already been mentioned previously. If the diyah is to be given in gold, silver, or coins, then the value of camels with the specified characteristics must be given, which varies according to region and time.
(2) The original blood money (diyah) is camels, the details of which have already been mentioned previously. If the diyah is to be given in gold, silver, or coins, then the value of camels with the specified characteristics must be given, which varies according to region and time.
Source: Sunan Nasa'i: Translation and Benefits by Shaykh Hafiz Muhammad Amin Hafizullah, Page: 4808
Shaykh Dr. Abdur Rahman Freywai
Explanation:
Note:
(The correct view is that this narration is mursal, as explicitly stated by Imam Abu Dawud and the author. Sufyan ibn ‘Uyaynah, who is more reliable than Muhammad ibn Muslim al-Ta’ifi, also narrated it from ‘Amr ibn Dinar, but he did not mention Ibn ‘Abbas (radi Allahu anhuma). See:
al-Irwa’ no. 2245)
Note:
(The correct view is that this narration is mursal, as explicitly stated by Imam Abu Dawud and the author. Sufyan ibn ‘Uyaynah, who is more reliable than Muhammad ibn Muslim al-Ta’ifi, also narrated it from ‘Amr ibn Dinar, but he did not mention Ibn ‘Abbas (radi Allahu anhuma). See:
al-Irwa’ no. 2245)
Source: Sunan al-Tirmidhi – Majlis ‘Ilmi Dar al-Da‘wah, New Delhi Edition, Page: 1388
