Hadith 1645

حَدَّثَنَا مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ عَبْدِ اللَّهِ بْنِ نُمَيْرٍ ، حَدَّثَنَا أَبُو خَالِدٍ الْأَحْمَرُ ، عَنْ عَمْرِو بْنِ قَيْسٍ ، عَنْ أَبِي إِسْحَاق ، عَنْ صِلَةَ بْنِ زُفَرَ ، قَالَ : كُنَّا عِنْدَ عَمَّارٍ فِي الْيَوْمِ الَّذِي يُشَكُّ فِيهِ ، فَأُتِيَ بِشَاةٍ فَتَنَحَّى بَعْضُ الْقَوْمِ ، فَقَالَ عَمَّارٌ : " مَنْ صَامَ هَذَا الْيَوْمَ فَقَدْ عَصَى أَبَا الْقَاسِمِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ " .
´It was narrated that Silah bin Zufar said:` “We were with ‘Ammar on the day concerning which there was some doubt. A (roasted) sheep was brought and some of the people moved away. ‘Ammar said: ‘Whoever is fasting on this day has disobeyed Abu Qasim (ﷺ).’”
Hadith Reference سنن ابن ماجه / كتاب الصيام / 1645
Hadith Grading الألبانی: صحيح  |  زبیر علی زئی: ضعيف, إسناده ضعيف, سنن أبي داود (2334) ترمذي (686) نسائي (2190), انوار الصحيفه، صفحه نمبر 439
Hadith Takhrij « صحیح البخاری/الصوم 11 ( 1906 ) ، ( تعلیقا ) سنن ابی داود/الصوم 10 ( 2334 ) ، سنن الترمذی/الصوم 3 ( 686 ) ، سنن النسائی/الصیام 20 ( 2190 ) ، ( تحفة الأشراف : 10354 ) وقد أخرجہ : سنن الدارمی/الصوم 1 ( 1724 ) ( صحیح ) »
Explanation & Benefits
Maulana Ataullah Sajid
Benefits and Issues:


The "day of doubt" refers to the day after the twenty-ninth of Sha'ban,
when the sighting of the crescent moon has not been confirmed.
In reality, this day is the thirtieth day of Sha'ban.


Some people fast on the thirtieth of Sha'ban
thinking that perhaps Ramadan has begun and they are unaware of it.
If Ramadan has indeed started, then this fast will count as a Ramadan fast;
otherwise, it will be considered a voluntary (nafl) fast.
Fasting on such a day out of doubt is prohibited in the Shari'ah.


Allah Ta'ala has determined the quantity and timings of obligatory acts of worship.
It is not correct to abolish the distinction between voluntary (nafl) and obligatory (fard) acts of worship.


If a righteous deed is performed contrary to the Sunnah,
then it no longer remains a righteous deed.


According to most researchers, this narration is authentic.
The reason why some of the Companions (radi Allahu anhum ajma'in) did not break their fast could be
that they were fasting as per their usual practice, which is permissible.
Source: Commentary on Sunan Ibn Mājah by Mawlānā ‘Atā’ullāh Sājid, Page: 1645