Toggle above to switch between keyword search and direct hadith lookup

Hadith 2492

حَدَّثَنَا بِشْرُ بْنُ مُحَمَّدٍ ، أَخْبَرَنَا عبْدُ اللَّهِ أَخْبَرَنَا سَعِيدُ بْنُ أَبِي عَرُوبَةَ ، عَنْ قَتَادَةَ ، عَنْ النَّضْرِ بْنِ أَنَسٍ ، عَنْ بَشِيرِ بْنِ نَهِيكٍ ، عَنْ أَبِي هُرَيْرَةَ رَضِيَ اللَّهُ عَنْهُ ، عَنِ النَّبِيِّ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ ، قَالَ : " مَنْ أَعْتَقَ شَقِيصًا مِنْ مَمْلُوكِهِ فَعَلَيْهِ خَلَاصُهُ فِي مَالِهِ ، فَإِنْ لَمْ يَكُنْ لَهُ مَالٌ قُوِّمَ الْمَمْلُوكُ قِيمَةَ عَدْلٍ ، ثُمَّ اسْتُسْعِيَ غَيْرَ مَشْقُوقٍ عَلَيْهِ " .
Narrated Abu Huraira: The Prophet said, "Whoever manumits his share of a jointly possessed slave, it is imperative for him to get that slave manumitted completely by paying the remaining price, and if he does not have sufficient money to manumit him, then the price of the slave should be estimated justly, and he is to be allowed to work and earn the amount that will manumit him (without overburdening him)".
Hadith Reference صحيح البخاري / كتاب الشركة / 2492
Hadith Grading محدثین: أحاديث صحيح البخاريّ كلّها صحيحة
Explanation & Benefits
Maulana Dawood Raz
Hadith Commentary: That is, do not impose upon him a burden he cannot bear; when he pays the price for the remaining shares, he will become free.

Ibn Battal rahimahullah said: When dividing among partners, drawing lots (qur‘ah) to resolve disputes is Sunnah, and all jurists (fuqaha) are in agreement on this. Only some jurists from Kufa have denied this and have said that drawing lots is like azlam (divining arrows), which is prohibited in the Qur’an.

Imam Abu Hanifah rahimahullah has also deemed it permissible.

In another authentic hadith, it is mentioned that the Prophet sallallahu alayhi wa sallam, when setting out on a journey, would draw lots among his wives; whichever name was drawn, he would take her along.

Nowadays, drawing lots has become so common that even for the journey of Hajj, the names of pilgrims are selected by drawing lots.
Source: Sahih Bukhari: Commentary by Maulana Dawood Raz, Page: 2492
Shaykh Abdul Sattar al-Hammad
Hadith Commentary:
(1)
Imam Bukhari rahimahullah’s objective here is not to discuss the rulings and issues related to the emancipation of a slave, but rather to clarify at this point that if something is jointly owned by two or more people, and one of them, due to some necessity, wishes to separate, then one should not take undue advantage of his necessity. Instead, the value of that item should be determined justly and fairly, and his share should be separated accordingly. This is as these ahadith encourage the fair valuation of a jointly owned slave.

(2)
The meaning of these ahadith is that if a person emancipates his share in a jointly owned slave, then it is necessary that he, from his own wealth, ensures the complete emancipation of the slave. If he does not possess sufficient wealth, then the slave himself should strive to assist in paying the remaining share, but in this matter, no harshness should be shown towards the slave.
Source: Hidayat al-Qari: Commentary on Sahih Bukhari, Urdu, Page: 2492
Shaykh Abdul Sattar al-Hammad
Hadith Commentary:
From these ahadith, it is understood that partnership in a slave is permissible, because emancipating one's share of a slave is based on valid ownership; if one is not the owner, one cannot emancipate.
To emancipate one's share means that there will be other partners in the slave as well.
Other issues related to emancipation (ʿitq) will be discussed later.
Source: Hidayat al-Qari: Commentary on Sahih Bukhari, Urdu, Page: 2504
Shaykh Abdul Sattar al-Hammad
Hadith Commentary:
The purpose of this chapter is that a slave should not be subjected to unnecessary compulsion.
If he is unable to perform labor or work, then the portion that has been freed will remain free, and in the remaining portion, slavery will persist as before.
In reality, Imam Bukhari rahimahullah wishes to reconcile two different narrations in this chapter.
The apparently conflicting narrations are as follows:
➊ If the one who emancipates (the slave) is not wealthy, then the slave will remain free to the extent that he has been emancipated.
➋ If the emancipator is not of means, then the slave should be made to work, but he should not be subjected to hardship.
The reconciliation is that when the slave is not capable of labor or work, and the emancipator is also destitute, then the slave will retain only the amount of freedom that he has received. And when the emancipator is not of means, but the slave is capable of labor and work, then he should be made to work, and the remaining partners should be paid the price of their shares accordingly.
Since slavery is not related to our practical lives, we suffice with this much.
And Allah knows best.
Source: Hidayat al-Qari: Commentary on Sahih Bukhari, Urdu, Page: 2527
Shaykh Maulana Abdul Aziz Alvi
Hadith Commentary: Benefits and Issues: The row of women will be separate; they will not join the row of men or children.
Source: Tuhfat al-Muslim: Commentary on Sahih Muslim, Page: 1502
Shaykh Umar Farooq Saeedi
Benefits and Issues:
In this hadith, there is encouragement that the one who has freed his share should also free the remainder, so that he may attain complete virtue.
Source: Sunan Abu Dawood – Commentary by Shaykh Umar Farooq Saeedi, Page: 3938
Maulana Ataullah Sajid
Benefits and Issues:

A slave can be owned by more than one person, for example:
A person had a slave, and when he passed away, his two sons inherited him; both of them are equal partners in his ownership.
Or, if several people pooled their money and bought him, then he will be their joint property.


If one owner of a jointly owned slave frees his share, the remaining share does not automatically become free.


In this case, the one who frees his share should pay his partners their share of the slave’s legitimate price, purchase the remaining share, and then free it as well, so that the slave’s freedom is complete.


The second scenario is that this half-free slave should be given the opportunity to earn and pay half of his price to the owner who did not free his share.


It is forbidden to subject this slave to undue hardship for prompt payment; rather, just as a debtor is given respite, he too should be granted appropriate time.
Source: Commentary on Sunan Ibn Mājah by Mawlānā ‘Atā’ullāh Sājid, Page: 2527