Toggle above to switch between keyword search and direct hadith lookup

Hadith 6768

(وَعَنْهُ مِنْ طَرِيقٍ ثَانٍ) قَالَ كُنْتُ عِنْدَ بُسْرِ بْنِ أَرْطَاةَ فَأُتِيَ بِمَصْدَرٍ قَدْ سَرَقَ بُخْتِيَّةً فَقَالَ لَوْلَا أَنِّي سَمِعْتُ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَآلِهِ وَسَلَّمَ نَهَانَا عَنِ الْقَطْعِ فِي الْغَزْوِ لَقَطَعْتُكَ فَجَلَدَ ثُمَّ خَلَّى سَبِيلَهُ
(Second chain) He says: I was with Sayyiduna Busar bin Artaat (may Allah be pleased with him), a thief was brought to him who had stolen a Bactrian camel. Sayyiduna Busar (may Allah be pleased with him) said: If I had not heard the Noble Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) forbidding the cutting of the hand during a military expedition, I would have cut off your hand.
Hadith Reference الفتح الربانی / أبواب حد السرقة / 6768
Hadith Grading محدثین: صحیح
Hadith Takhrij «انظر الحديث بالطريق الاول ترقیم بيت الأفكار الدولية: 17777»
Brief Explanation
Benefits: … The wording of the narration in Sunan al-Nasa’i (4982) is that the Messenger of Allah sallallahu alayhi wa sallam said: “Hands are not to be cut off during travel.” … “In travel, the thief’s hand should not be cut off.” However, what is meant by travel here is the journey of battle, as is evident from the hadith of this chapter. In the journey of battle, the main objective is the defeat of the enemy, so attention should be focused on that. It is also possible that the reason for not cutting the hand at such a time is that the person might become enraged and flee into enemy territory and, joining them, become an apostate. But this ruling does not mean that the prescribed punishment (hadd) is completely dropped; rather, when the return from travel occurs, the hadd will be implemented, because the prescribed limits of the Shari’ah cannot be abrogated.